Suppr超能文献

两种用于快速检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)抗原的荧光免疫测定法的评估——检测感染性冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的新工具

Evaluation of two fluorescence immunoassays for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-new tool to detect infective COVID-19 patients.

作者信息

Porte Lorena, Legarraga Paulette, Iruretagoyena Mirentxu, Vollrath Valeska, Pizarro Gabriel, Munita Jose, Araos Rafael, Weitzel Thomas

机构信息

Laboratorio Clínico, Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.

Servicio de Infectología, Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2021 Jan 21;9:e10801. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10801. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Real-Time Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) is currently the only recommended diagnostic method for SARS-CoV-2. However, rapid immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2 antigen could significantly reduce the COVID-19 burden currently weighing on laboratories around the world.

METHODS

We evaluated the performance of two rapid fluorescence immunoassays (FIAs), SOFIA SARS Antigen FIA (Quidel Corporation, San Diego, CA, USA) and STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA (SD Biosensor Inc., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea), which use an automated reader. The study used 64 RT-PCR characterized clinical samples (32 positive; 32 negative), which consisted of nasopharyngeal swabs in universal transport medium.

RESULTS

Of the 32 positive specimens, all from patients within 5 days of symptom onset, the Quidel and SD Biosensor assays detected 30 (93.8%) and 29 (90.6%) samples, respectively. Among the 27 samples with high viral loads (Ct ≤ 25), the two tests had a sensitivity of 100%. Specificity was 96.9% for both kits.

CONCLUSION

The high performance of the evaluated FIAs indicates a potential use as rapid and PCR-independent tools for COVID-19 diagnosis in early stages of infection. The excellent sensitivity to detect cases with viral loads above ~10 copies/mL (Ct values ≤ 25), the estimated threshold of contagiousness, suggests that the assays might serve to rapidly identify infective individuals.

摘要

背景

实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)是目前推荐的唯一用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的诊断方法。然而,针对SARS-CoV-2抗原的快速免疫测定法可显著减轻目前全球实验室所承受的2019冠状病毒病负担。

方法

我们评估了两种使用自动读数仪的快速荧光免疫测定法(FIA)的性能,即索非亚SARS抗原FIA(美国加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥的Quidel公司)和标准F COVID-19抗原FIA(韩国京畿道的SD Biosensor公司)。该研究使用了64份经RT-PCR鉴定的临床样本(32份阳性;32份阴性),这些样本由置于通用运输培养基中的鼻咽拭子组成。

结果

在32份阳性标本中,所有标本均来自症状出现5天内的患者,Quidel和SD Biosensor检测法分别检测出30份(93.8%)和29份(90.6%)样本。在27份病毒载量高(Ct≤25)的样本中,两种检测方法的灵敏度均为100%。两种试剂盒的特异性均为96.9%。

结论

所评估的FIA性能良好,表明其有潜力作为快速且独立于PCR的工具用于感染早期的2019冠状病毒病诊断。对于检测病毒载量高于约10拷贝/毫升(Ct值≤25)的病例具有出色的灵敏度,该病毒载量是估计的传染性阈值,这表明这些检测方法可能有助于快速识别感染个体。

相似文献

2
On-field evaluation of a ultra-rapid fluorescence immunoassay as a frontline test for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic.
J Virol Methods. 2021 Sep;295:114201. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114201. Epub 2021 May 28.
3
Diagnostic Performance of Six Rapid Antigen Tests for SARS-CoV-2.
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Apr 27;10(2):e0235121. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02351-21. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
5
Evaluation of the rapid antigen detection test STANDARD F COVID-19 Ag FIA for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: experience from an Emergency Department.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Jun;103(2):115683. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115683. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
7
Evaluation of antigen-based rapid detection test for the diagnosis of SARS CoV-2 in low-income countries.
J Virol Methods. 2022 Feb;300:114409. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114409. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
9
Evaluating the field performance of multiple SARS-Cov-2 antigen rapid tests using nasopharyngeal swab samples.
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 14;17(2):e0262399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262399. eCollection 2022.
10

引用本文的文献

1
State-of-art high-performance Nano-systems for mutated coronavirus infection management: From Lab to Clinic.
OpenNano. 2022 Nov-Dec;8:100078. doi: 10.1016/j.onano.2022.100078. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
4
COVID-19 self-testing: Countries accelerating policies ahead of WHO guidelines during pandemics, a global consultation.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Mar 18;4(3):e0002369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002369. eCollection 2024.
5
Rapid assays of SARS-CoV-2 virus and noble biosensors by nanomaterials.
Nano Converg. 2024 Jan 8;11(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40580-023-00408-z.
8
Clinical Evaluation of Two Rapid Antigen Tests for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Detection.
Ann Lab Med. 2023 Jan 1;43(1):120-123. doi: 10.3343/alm.2023.43.1.120. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
9
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
10
Performance of Antigen Detection Tests for SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 4;12(6):1388. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061388.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of four rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection tests using universal transport medium.
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2021 Jan-Feb;39:101942. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101942. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
2
Viral Cultures for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infectivity Assessment: A Systematic Review.
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):e3884-e3899. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1764.
3
Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 screening.
Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 1;7(1). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd5393. Print 2021 Jan.
5
Performance of a novel diagnostic assay for rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection in nasopharynx samples.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Mar;27(3):487-488. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.030. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
6
Review of analytical performance of COVID-19 detection methods.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2021 Jan;413(1):35-48. doi: 10.1007/s00216-020-02889-x. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
7
Viral load of SARS-CoV-2 across patients and compared to other respiratory viruses.
Microbes Infect. 2020 Nov-Dec;22(10):617-621. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
8
Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 26;8(8):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.
9
Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Screening Strategies to Permit the Safe Reopening of College Campuses in the United States.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2016818. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16818.
10
Development and Potential Usefulness of the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip Diagnostic Assay in a Pandemic Context.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 May 8;7:225. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00225. eCollection 2020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验