Suppr超能文献

在中国人群中,反流症状指数与喉咽pH监测在喉咽反流诊断中的一致性较差。

Poor consistency between reflux symptom index and laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring in laryngopharyngeal reflux diagnosis in Chinese population.

作者信息

Wang Jun-Yao, Peng Tao, Zhao Li-Li, Feng Gui-Jian, Liu Yu-Lan

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(1):25. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4783.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether the reflux symptom index (RSI) can replace pH monitoring as a diagnostic tool for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in Chinese people. The relationships between reflux parameters and LPR symptoms also require further research.

METHODS

A total of 216 Chinese patients underwent laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring and filled out an RSI questionnaire. Laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring indicated a diagnosis of LPR for patients with 7 or more episodes of reflux or a reflex area index (RAI) of 6.3 or more. The RSI questionnaire indicated a diagnosis of LPR for patients with RSI scores of 14 or higher.

RESULTS

Of the 216 patients, 85 were diagnosed with LPR as assessed by the RSI, and 72 were diagnosed with LPR through laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring. The Cohen's kappa coefficient comparing LPR diagnosis consistency between RSI score and laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring was 0.133 (P=0.007). This indicated the two diagnostic methods were consistent to a low degree; the total consistency rate was only 59.7% (129/216). The sensitivity of the RSI was 48.6% (35/72), and its specificity was 82.5% (94/114). For convenience, we named the nine symptom groups in the RSI sequentially as P1-P9. P1, P2, P3, P5, P6, and P7 were all correlated with at least one reflux parameter (P<0.05), but P4, P8, and P9 were not correlated with any reflux parameters (P>0.05). A total of 72 patients were diagnosed using pH monitoring, the gold standard for LPR diagnosis. The most common symptoms of LPR were found to be P9, P3, P8, P7, and P2 in these patients. The symptoms that most seriously affected patients were P9, P8, P3, P7, and P2.

CONCLUSIONS

The consistency in diagnosis of LPR between the RSI and laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring was poor, meaning the RSI is not a suitable LPR initial screening tool and cannot replace pH monitoring. Additionally, reflux symptoms P4, P8, and P9 were not correlated with any reflux parameters. The most prevalent LPR symptom was P9, followed by P3, P8, P7, and P2. The most severe symptom was also P9, followed by P8, P3, P7, and P2.

摘要

背景

反流症状指数(RSI)是否能够替代pH监测作为中国人喉咽反流(LPR)的诊断工具尚不清楚。反流参数与LPR症状之间的关系也需要进一步研究。

方法

共有216例中国患者接受了喉咽pH监测并填写了RSI问卷。喉咽pH监测显示,反流发作7次或更多次或反流区域指数(RAI)为6.3或更高的患者被诊断为LPR。RSI问卷显示,RSI评分14分或更高的患者被诊断为LPR。

结果

在216例患者中,85例经RSI评估诊断为LPR,72例通过喉咽pH监测诊断为LPR。比较RSI评分与喉咽pH监测之间LPR诊断一致性的Cohen's kappa系数为0.133(P = 0.007)。这表明两种诊断方法的一致性程度较低;总符合率仅为59.7%(129/216)。RSI的敏感性为48.6%(35/72),特异性为82.5%(94/114)。为方便起见,我们将RSI中的九个症状组依次命名为P1 - P9。P1、P2、P3、P5、P6和P7均与至少一个反流参数相关(P < 0.05),但P4、P8和P9与任何反流参数均无相关性(P > 0.05)。共有72例患者采用LPR诊断的金标准pH监测进行诊断。在这些患者中,LPR最常见的症状为P9、P3、P8、P7和P2。对患者影响最严重的症状为P9、P8、P3、P7和P2。

结论

RSI与喉咽pH监测在LPR诊断方面的一致性较差,这意味着RSI不是合适的LPR初始筛查工具,不能替代pH监测。此外,反流症状P4、P8和P9与任何反流参数均无相关性。最常见的LPR症状是P9,其次是P3、P8、P7和P2。最严重的症状也是P9,其次是P8、P3、P7和P2。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2da7/7859794/034c8d113de8/atm-09-01-25-f1.jpg

相似文献

2
Comparison of Reflux Symptom Score versus Reflux Symptom Index in screening laryngopharyngeal reflux.
Laryngoscope. 2023 Sep;133(9):2104-2109. doi: 10.1002/lary.30489. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
4
Assessment and Diagnostic Accuracy Evaluation of the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) Scale: Psychometric Properties using Optimal Scaling Techniques.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020 Oct;129(10):1020-1029. doi: 10.1177/0003489420930034. Epub 2020 May 29.
5
The Utility of the Reflux Symptom Index for Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in an Allergy Patient Population.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jan-Feb;6(1):132-138.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.04.039. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
7
[Application of reflux symptom index in diagnosis of allergic patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux].
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Nov;32(22):1711-1713. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.22.007.
9
Nissen Fundoplication for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux After Patient Selection Using Dual pH, Full Column Impedance Testing: A Pilot Study.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016 Sep;125(9):722-8. doi: 10.1177/0003489416649974. Epub 2016 May 23.
10
There is a Good Consistency Between Reflux Symptom Score-12 and Reflux Symptom Index in Chinese Population.
J Voice. 2025 May;39(3):855.e1-855.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.11.021. Epub 2022 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
[Use of flexible transnasal esophagogastroscopy in patients with unclear globus sensation].
HNO. 2024 Aug;72(8):571-577. doi: 10.1007/s00106-024-01462-7. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
2
Patient journey in gastroesophageal reflux disease: real-world perspectives from Italian gastroenterologists, primary care physicians, and ENT specialists.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 22;17:17562848241239590. doi: 10.1177/17562848241239590. eCollection 2024.
3
Role of Reflux Symptom Index and Reflux Finding Score in Diagnosing Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Prospective Study.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun;75(2):777-783. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03482-1. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
4
[The application progress on diagnostic scales of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease].
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Apr;37(4):313-317. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.04.016.

本文引用的文献

1
[The influence of age on the score of reflux symptom index scale and reflux finding score scale in the diagnosis of pharyngeal and laryngeal reflux].
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb;34(2):170-172. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2020.02.017.
3
[Correlation analysis between Dx-pH monitoring and proton pump inhibitor test in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease].
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jan 7;55(1):34-39. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2020.01.007.
5
Treatment Pattern and Economic Burden of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Patients in Korea.
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Apr 30;26(2):281-288. doi: 10.5056/jnm19050.
6
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Reflux Symptom Index.
J Voice. 2020 Nov;34(6):965.e23-965.e28. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.05.015. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
7
Utility of 24-hour pharyngeal pH monitoring and clinical feature in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.
Acta Otolaryngol. 2019 Mar;139(3):299-303. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1571280.
8
Esophageal Impedance-pH Monitoring and Pharyngeal pH Monitoring in the Diagnosis of Extraesophageal Reflux in Children.
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 Mar 3;2019:6271910. doi: 10.1155/2019/6271910. eCollection 2019.
9
Acidic Pharyngeal Reflux Does Not Correlate with Symptoms and Laryngeal Injury Attributed to Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 May;64(5):1270-1280. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5372-1. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
10
Gastroesophageal and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Associated With Laryngeal Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jun;17(7):1253-1264.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.10.028. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验