Suppr超能文献

在全球大流行期间开展基于互联网的随机临床试验所吸取的经验教训。

Lessons Learned From Conducting Internet-Based Randomized Clinical Trials During a Global Pandemic.

作者信息

Pullen Matthew F, Pastick Katelyn A, Williams Darlisha A, Nascene Alanna A, Bangdiwala Ananta S, Okafor Elizabeth C, Hullsiek Katherine Huppler, Skipper Caleb P, Lofgren Sarah M, Engen Nicole, Abassi Mahsa, McDonald Emily G, Lee Todd C, Rajasingham Radha, Boulware David R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 28;8(2):ofaa602. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa602. eCollection 2021 Feb.

Abstract

As the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic evolved, it was apparent that well designed and rapidly conducted randomized clinical trials were urgently needed. However, traditional clinical trial design presented several challenges. Notably, disease prevalence initially varied by time and region, and the pockets of outbreaks evolved geographically over time. Coupled with an occupational hazard from in-person study visits, timely recruitment would prove difficult in a traditional in-person clinical trial. Thus, our team opted to launch nationwide internet-based clinical trials using patient-reported outcome measures. In total, 2795 participants were recruited using traditional and social media, with screening and enrollment performed via an online data capture system. Follow-up surveys and survey reminders were similarly managed through this online system with manual participant outreach in the event of missing data. In this report, we present a narrative of our experience running internet-based clinical trials and provide recommendations for the design of future clinical trials during a world pandemic.

摘要

随着严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2大流行的演变,很明显迫切需要精心设计并迅速开展的随机临床试验。然而,传统的临床试验设计面临着几个挑战。值得注意的是,疾病流行率最初随时间和地区而变化,疫情爆发区域也随时间在地理上发生演变。再加上亲自进行研究访问存在职业风险,在传统的亲自参与的临床试验中,及时招募患者将很困难。因此,我们的团队选择使用患者报告的结局指标开展全国性的基于互联网的临床试验。总共通过传统媒体和社交媒体招募了2795名参与者,通过在线数据采集系统进行筛选和入组。随访调查和调查提醒同样通过这个在线系统进行管理,在出现数据缺失的情况下会进行人工参与者外展。在本报告中,我们讲述了我们开展基于互联网的临床试验的经验,并为世界大流行期间未来临床试验的设计提供建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fc0/7850107/c566bdb798b2/ofaa602_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验