• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用数字健康技术的去中心化临床试验中的参与者体验:ACTIV-6研究。

Participant experiences in a decentralized clinical trial using digital health technologies: The ACTIV-6 study.

作者信息

Reale Carrie, Faiman Janelle, Beebe Russ, Marlin Jessica S, Collins Sean, Boulware David R, Dunsmore Sarah E, Thicklin Florence, Stewart Thomas G, Hernandez Adrian F, Rothman Russell L, Lindsell Christopher J, Anders Shilo

机构信息

Center for Research and Innovation in Systems Safety (CRISS), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Apr 16;9(1):e121. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.69. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2025.69
PMID:40599176
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12209966/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inadequate recruitment and retention impede clinical trial goals. Emerging decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) leveraging digital health technologies (DHTs) for remote recruitment and data collection aim to address barriers to participation in traditional trials. The ACTIV-6 trial is a DCT using DHTs, but participants' experiences of such trials remain largely unknown. This study explored participants' perspectives of the ACTIV-6 DCT that tested outpatient COVID-19 therapeutics.

METHODS

Participants in the ACTIV-6 study were recruited via email to share their day-to-day trial experiences during 1-hour virtual focus groups. Two human factors researchers guided group discussions through a semi-structured script that probed expectations and perceptions of study activities. Qualitative data analysis was conducted using a grounded theory approach with open coding to identify key themes.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight ACTIV-6 study participants aged 30+ years completed a virtual focus group including 1-4 participants each. Analysis yielded three major themes: perceptions of the DCT experience, study activity engagement, and trust. Participants perceived the use of remote DCT procedures supported by DHTs as an acceptable and efficient method of organizing and tracking study activities, communicating with study personnel, and managing study medications at home. Use of social media was effective in supporting geographically dispersed participant recruitment but also raised issues with trust and study legitimacy.

CONCLUSIONS

While participants in this qualitative study viewed the DCT-with-DHT approach as reasonably efficient and engaging, they also identified challenges to address. Understanding facilitators and barriers to DCT participation and DHT interaction can help improve future research design.

摘要

背景

招募不足和留存率低阻碍了临床试验目标的实现。新兴的去中心化临床试验(DCT)利用数字健康技术(DHT)进行远程招募和数据收集,旨在解决参与传统试验的障碍。ACTIV-6试验是一项使用DHT的DCT,但此类试验中参与者的体验仍 largely unknown。本研究探讨了参与测试门诊COVID-19治疗方法的ACTIV-6 DCT的参与者的观点。

方法

通过电子邮件招募ACTIV-6研究的参与者,让他们在1小时的虚拟焦点小组中分享日常试验经历。两名人为因素研究人员通过一个半结构化脚本指导小组讨论,该脚本探讨了对研究活动的期望和看法。使用扎根理论方法进行定性数据分析,通过开放编码确定关键主题。

结果

28名年龄在30岁及以上的ACTIV-6研究参与者完成了一个虚拟焦点小组,每个小组有1-4名参与者。分析得出三个主要主题:对DCT体验的看法、研究活动参与度和信任。参与者认为,由DHT支持的远程DCT程序的使用是组织和跟踪研究活动、与研究人员沟通以及在家管理研究药物的可接受且有效的方法。社交媒体的使用有效地支持了地理上分散的参与者招募,但也引发了信任和研究合法性方面的问题。

结论

虽然这项定性研究中的参与者认为DCT与DHT相结合的方法相当有效且有吸引力,但他们也指出了需要解决的挑战。了解DCT参与和DHT交互的促进因素和障碍有助于改进未来的研究设计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a287/12209966/9b91a3c907ed/S205986612500069X_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a287/12209966/fe97d445517c/S205986612500069X_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a287/12209966/9b91a3c907ed/S205986612500069X_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a287/12209966/fe97d445517c/S205986612500069X_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a287/12209966/9b91a3c907ed/S205986612500069X_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Participant experiences in a decentralized clinical trial using digital health technologies: The ACTIV-6 study.使用数字健康技术的去中心化临床试验中的参与者体验:ACTIV-6研究。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Apr 16;9(1):e121. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.69. eCollection 2025.
2
Mitigating fraud in a fully decentralized clinical trial of a digital health intervention.减轻数字健康干预全分散式临床试验中的欺诈行为。
Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaf047.
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Exploring the Barriers to and Facilitators of Using Virtual Reality Relaxation for Patients With Psychiatric Problems: Qualitative Focus Group Study.探索精神疾病患者使用虚拟现实放松疗法的障碍与促进因素:定性焦点小组研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 11;27:e65308. doi: 10.2196/65308.
5
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Adaptation of Clinical Research Staff to Decentralized Clinical Trials and Impacts on the Patient-Centered Experience: Qualitative Interview Study.临床研究人员对去中心化临床试验的适应及其对以患者为中心体验的影响:定性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 16;27:e62947. doi: 10.2196/62947.
8
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
9
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Decentralized Clinical Trials as a New Paradigm of Trial Delivery to Improve Equity of Access.去中心化临床试验作为一种新的试验交付范式,以改善获取公平性。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Apr 1;10(4):526-530. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6565.
2
The ACTIV-6 Stakeholder Advisory Committee: a model for virtual engagement in decentralized clinical trials.ACTIV-6 利益相关者咨询委员会:去中心化临床试验中虚拟参与的一个范例。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Nov 20;7(1):e264. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.671. eCollection 2023.
3
Strategies used for the COVID-OUT decentralized trial of outpatient treatment of SARS-CoV-2.
用于新冠门诊治疗去中心化试验(COVID-OUT)的策略。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Nov 7;7(1):e242. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.668. eCollection 2023.
4
Methods and perceptions of success for patient recruitment in decentralized clinical studies.分散式临床研究中患者招募的方法与成功认知
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Oct 6;7(1):e232. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.643. eCollection 2023.
5
ACTIV-6: Operationalizing a decentralized, outpatient randomized platform trial to evaluate efficacy of repurposed medicines for COVID-19.ACTIV-6:开展一项去中心化的门诊随机平台试验,以评估新冠病毒病(COVID-19)药物再利用的疗效。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Oct 31;7(1):e221. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.644. eCollection 2023.
6
Decentralized clinical trials in the trial innovation network: Value, strategies, and lessons learned.试验创新网络中的去中心化临床试验:价值、策略及经验教训
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jul 25;7(1):e170. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.597. eCollection 2023.
7
Digital health technology in clinical trials.临床试验中的数字健康技术。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 May 18;6(1):88. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00841-8.
8
The effectiveness of digital health technologies for patients with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review.数字健康技术对糖尿病患者的有效性:一项系统综述。
Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2022 Oct 24;3:936752. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2022.936752. eCollection 2022.
9
Lopinavir/ritonavir for treatment of non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial.洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗非住院 COVID-19 患者的随机临床试验。
Int J Infect Dis. 2023 Mar;128:223-229. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.12.028. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
10
Deployment of an End-to-End Remote, Digitalized Clinical Study Protocol in COVID-19: Process Evaluation.在新冠肺炎疫情中部署端到端远程数字化临床研究方案:过程评估
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 29;6(7):e37832. doi: 10.2196/37832.