School of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
School of Kinesiology (Faculty of Education),Experimental Medicine Program (Faculty of Medicine), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
J Sports Sci. 2021 Jul;39(13):1461-1471. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2021.1877460. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
Family-based physical activity (PA) interventions have proven effective in modifying PA; yet, the underlying mechanisms are currently unclear. In this study, we follow-up upon prior trial data that showed changes to child moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) as a result of a family education+planning intervention compared to an education-only condition. We examined parents' perceived family PA frequency, family PA social cognitions, and family PA habit over 26 weeks between the two conditions. One hundred and two parents (of children aged 6 to 12 yrs), were recruited through advertisements and randomized to either the planning + education condition (n = 52) or an education-only condition (n = 50). Self-reported family PA, and measures of theory of planned behaviour, planning intention, and habit were completed by the contact parent at baseline, six-week, 13-week, and 26-week time-periods. The education+planning intervention increased planning intention ( <.01) and family PA ( =.06) compared to the© education-only group. The effect of condition on the putative mediators did not explain these changes (all 95% CIs crossed 0), and family PA was associated with child MVPA only at 13 weeks ( <.01). Intervention 20 assignment had a small indirect effect on family PA (favouring©the education+planning group) via Habit. Perceived behavioural©control and habit were consistent predictors of family PA ( <.05), but not PA intention or planning intention ( >.05). The planning+education intervention showed improved family PA and planning intention, yet null mediation results suggest that other variables from the family system (e.g., child motivation, other parent's motivation and plans) are likely needed to fully understand the intervention effects. The promotion of perceived behavioural control and habit to assist in family PA is recommended for future research in this population.
基于家庭的身体活动(PA)干预措施已被证明在改变 PA 方面是有效的;然而,其潜在机制目前尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们对先前的试验数据进行了跟进,该数据显示,与仅接受教育的条件相比,家庭教育+计划干预会导致儿童中度到剧烈 PA(MVPA)的变化。我们在两种条件下的 26 周内检查了父母对家庭 PA 频率、家庭 PA 社会认知和家庭 PA 习惯的感知。通过广告招募了 102 名父母(孩子年龄在 6 至 12 岁之间),并将他们随机分配到计划+教育组(n=52)或仅教育组(n=50)。在基线、6 周、13 周和 26 周的时间段内,由联络父母报告家庭 PA 情况,并完成对计划行为理论、计划意图和习惯的测量。与仅接受教育的组相比,教育+计划干预增加了计划意图(<.01)和家庭 PA(<.06)。条件对假定的中介变量没有影响(所有 95%置信区间均与 0 交叉),并且家庭 PA 仅在 13 周时与儿童 MVPA 相关(<.01)。干预 20 的分配通过习惯对家庭 PA 产生了较小的间接影响(有利于教育+计划组)。感知行为控制和习惯是家庭 PA 的一致预测因素(<.05),但 PA 意图和计划意图不是(>.05)。教育+计划干预显示出家庭 PA 和计划意图的改善,但中介结果为零表明,家庭系统中的其他变量(例如,儿童动机、其他父母的动机和计划)可能需要充分理解干预效果。建议在该人群的未来研究中,促进感知行为控制和习惯以帮助进行家庭 PA。