• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

明智选择重症监护:接下来的五项。

Choosing Wisely For Critical Care: The Next Five.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.

Society of Critical Care Medicine, Mount Prospect, IL.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 1;49(3):472-481. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004876.

DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000004876
PMID:33555779
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To formulate new "Choosing Wisely" for Critical Care recommendations that identify best practices to avoid waste and promote value while providing critical care.

DATA SOURCES

Semistructured narrative literature review and quantitative survey assessments.

STUDY SELECTION

English language publications that examined critical care practices in relation to reducing cost or waste.

DATA EXTRACTION

Practices assessed to add no value to critical care were grouped by category. Taskforce assessment, modified Delphi consensus building, and quantitative survey analysis identified eight novel recommendations to avoid wasteful critical care practices. These were submitted to the Society of Critical Care Medicine membership for evaluation and ranking.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Results from the quantitative Society of Critical Care Medicine membership survey identified the top scoring five of eight recommendations. These five highest ranked recommendations established Society of Critical Care Medicine's Next Five "Choosing" Wisely for Critical Care practices.

CONCLUSIONS

Five new recommendations to reduce waste and enhance value in the practice of critical care address invasive devices, proactive liberation from mechanical ventilation, antibiotic stewardship, early mobilization, and providing goal-concordant care. These recommendations supplement the initial critical care recommendations from the "Choosing Wisely" campaign.

摘要

目的

制定新的《明智选择》重症监护建议,以确定最佳实践,避免浪费,同时提供重症监护。

资料来源

半结构化叙述性文献回顾和定量调查评估。

研究选择

英文出版物,研究与降低成本或浪费有关的重症监护实践。

资料提取

评估为重症监护增加价值的实践分为几类。专家组评估、改良 Delphi 共识建设和定量调查分析确定了八项避免浪费重症监护实践的新建议。这些建议提交给重症监护医学学会会员进行评估和排名。

资料综合

重症监护医学学会会员定量调查的结果确定了八项建议中的前五项。这五个最高排名的建议确立了重症监护医学学会的下一个五项“明智选择”的重症监护实践。

结论

五项新的减少重症监护实践中的浪费和提高价值的建议涉及侵入性器械、积极从机械通气中解放、抗生素管理、早期动员和提供目标一致的护理。这些建议补充了《明智选择》活动的最初重症监护建议。

相似文献

1
Choosing Wisely For Critical Care: The Next Five.明智选择重症监护:接下来的五项。
Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 1;49(3):472-481. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004876.
2
Choosing Wisely in Critical Care: Results of a National Survey From the Critical Care Societies Collaborative.明智选择在重症监护:来自重症监护学会协作组的全国性调查结果。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):331-336. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003496.
3
A Broader View of Quality: Choosing Wisely Recommendations From Other Specialties With High Relevance to Emergency Care.更广义的质量观:选择明智——与急诊护理高度相关的其他专业的推荐意见。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Sep;72(3):246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.06.041.
4
Choosing wisely® in critical care: maximizing value in the intensive care unit.重症监护中的明智选择®:在重症监护病房实现价值最大化。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Nov;42(11):2437-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000696.
5
An official American Thoracic Society/American Association of Critical-Care Nurses/American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine policy statement: the Choosing Wisely® Top 5 list in Critical Care Medicine.美国胸科学会/美国危重病护理护士协会/美国胸科医师学会/危重病医学会官方政策声明:危重病医学中的明智选择® 前 5 名列表。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Oct 1;190(7):818-26. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201407-1317ST.
6
Choosing Wisely in Critical Care: A National Survey of Critical Care Nurses.在重症监护中做出明智选择:一项针对重症监护护士的全国性调查。
Am J Crit Care. 2019 Nov;28(6):434-440. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2019241.
7
The Canadian Dermatology Association's Top Five Choosing Wisely Canada Recommendations.加拿大皮肤病学会的“明智选择”加拿大 5 项推荐。
J Cutan Med Surg. 2020 Sep/Oct;24(5):461-467. doi: 10.1177/1203475420928904. Epub 2020 May 20.
8
Choosing wisely in adult hospital medicine: five opportunities for improved healthcare value.成人医院医学中的明智选择:提高医疗保健价值的五个机会。
J Hosp Med. 2013 Sep;8(9):486-92. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2063. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
9
Choosing Wisely Canada-Top Five List in Hepatology: Official Position Statement of the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver (CASL) and Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC).明智选择加拿大肝病学前五名单:加拿大肝脏研究协会 (CASL) 和明智选择加拿大 (CWC) 的官方立场声明。
Ann Hepatol. 2019 Jan-Feb;18(1):165-171. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.7908.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring Goal-Concordant Care Using Electronic Clinical Notes.使用电子临床记录测量目标一致的护理
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2518967. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.18967.
2
Toward value-based care using cost mining: cost aggregation and visualization across the entire colorectal cancer patient pathway.利用成本挖掘实现基于价值的医疗:整个结直肠癌患者诊疗路径中的成本汇总与可视化
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Dec 27;24(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02446-5.
3
Leveraging the electronic health record to identify delivery of goal-concordant care.
利用电子健康记录来确定目标一致的护理服务的提供情况。
medRxiv. 2024 Sep 24:2024.09.24.24314226. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.24.24314226.
4
Tracheal intubation in critically ill adults with a physiologically difficult airway. An international Delphi study.成人危急气道生理困难患者的气管插管。一项国际性德尔菲研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Oct;50(10):1563-1579. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07578-2. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
5
Impact of Rounding Checklists on the Outcomes of Patients Admitted to ICUs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.集束化核对表对 ICU 患者结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Aug 20;6(8):e1140. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001140. eCollection 2024 Aug 1.
6
Factors Associated With Quality-of-Dying-and-Death Classes Among Critically Ill Patients.与危重症患者临终和死亡质量相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2420388. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.20388.
7
Unmasking the hidden aftermath: postintensive care unit sequelae, discharge preparedness, and long-term follow-up.揭开隐藏的后遗症:重症监护病房后遗症、出院准备和长期随访。
Crit Care Sci. 2024 Jun 14;36:e20240265en. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20240265-en. eCollection 2024.
8
Stretching oneself too thin and facing ethical challenges: Healthcare professionals' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.过度劳累和面临伦理挑战:COVID-19 大流行期间医护人员的经历。
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Dec;31(8):1630-1645. doi: 10.1177/09697330241230683. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
9
Gamification in Critical Care Education and Practice.重症监护教育与实践中的游戏化
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Jan 19;6(1):e1034. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001034. eCollection 2024 Jan.
10
The use of checklists in the intensive care unit: a scoping review.在重症监护病房中使用检查表:范围综述。
Crit Care. 2023 Nov 30;27(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04758-2.