Suppr超能文献

心脏康复是否会影响急性心肌梗死后的复发、再入院、血管重建和死亡率等临床预后?:系统评价与荟萃分析

Do Cardiac Rehabilitation Affect Clinical Prognoses Such as Recurrence, Readmission, Revascularization, and Mortality After AMI?: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Kim Chul, Choi Insun, Cho Songhee, Kim Ae Ryoung, Kim Wonseok, Jee Sungju

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Rehabil Med. 2021 Feb;45(1):57-70. doi: 10.5535/arm.20080. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze the effects of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on post-discharge prognoses of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted through four international medical and two Korean databases. Primary outcomes for the effectiveness of CR included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, recurrence, revascularization, major adverse cardiovascular event, major adverse cardiocerebrovascular event, and readmission. We summarized and analyzed results of studies about CR for AMI, including not only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) but also non-RCTs. We calculated the effect size separately by the study type.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles were finally selected. Of these, two articles were RCTs, while 12 were non-RCTs. In RCTs, the overall mortality rate was lower in the group that participated in CR than that in the conventional care group by 28% (relative risk=0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-1.57). Among non-RCTs, CR participation significantly decreased the overall risk of mortality. Moreover, the rates of recurrence and major adverse cardiovascular events were lower in the group that participated in CR compared to those in the non-CR group.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis shows that CR reduces the risk of re-hospitalization and all-cause mortality after AMI, compared to no participation in CR. This outcome was seen in RCTs as well as in non-RCTs. More studies are necessary for concrete conclusions about the beneficial effects of CR after AMI in various settings.

摘要

目的

我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以分析心脏康复(CR)对急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者出院后预后的影响。

方法

通过四个国际医学数据库和两个韩国数据库进行文献检索。CR有效性的主要结局包括全因死亡率、心血管死亡率、复发、血运重建、主要不良心血管事件、主要不良心脑血管事件和再入院。我们总结并分析了有关AMI的CR研究结果,不仅包括随机对照试验(RCT),还包括非RCT。我们根据研究类型分别计算效应量。

结果

最终选择了14篇文章。其中,2篇为RCT,12篇为非RCT。在RCT中,参与CR的组总死亡率比传统护理组低28%(相对风险=0.72;95%置信区间,0.34 - 1.57)。在非RCT中,参与CR显著降低了总体死亡风险。此外,与非CR组相比,参与CR的组复发率和主要不良心血管事件发生率更低。

结论

荟萃分析表明,与未参与CR相比,CR可降低AMI后再住院风险和全因死亡率。这一结果在RCT和非RCT中均可见。需要更多研究以得出关于CR在各种情况下对AMI有益效果的具体结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a52/7960955/ef89f2a23b48/arm-20080f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验