Suppr超能文献

基于人群的调查中死产结局的捕获和分类:EN-INDEPTH 研究。

Stillbirth outcome capture and classification in population-based surveys: EN-INDEPTH study.

机构信息

Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health (MARCH) Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

Popul Health Metr. 2021 Feb 8;19(Suppl 1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12963-020-00239-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Household surveys remain important sources of stillbirth data, but omission and misclassification are common. Classifying adverse pregnancy outcomes as stillbirths requires accurate reporting of vital status at birth and gestational age or birthweight for every pregnancy. Further categorisation, e.g. by sex, or timing (intrapartum/antepartum) improves data to understand and prevent stillbirth.

METHODS

We undertook a cross-sectional population-based survey of women of reproductive age in five health and demographic surveillance system sites in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau and Uganda (2017-2018). All women answered a full birth history with pregnancy loss questions (FBH+) or a full pregnancy history (FPH). A sub-sample across both groups were asked additional stillbirth questions. Questions were evaluated using descriptive measures. Using an interpretative paradigm and phenomenology methodology, focus group discussions with women exploring barriers to reporting birthweight for stillbirths were conducted. Thematic analysis was guided by an a priori codebook.

RESULTS

Overall 69,176 women reported 98,483 livebirths (FBH+) and 102,873 pregnancies (FPH). Additional questions were asked for 1453 stillbirths, 1528 neonatal deaths and 12,620 surviving children born in the 5 years prior to the survey. Completeness was high (> 99%) for existing FBH+/FPH questions on signs of life at birth and gestational age (months). Discordant responses in signs of life at birth between different questions were common; nearly one-quarter classified as stillbirths on FBH+/FPH were reported born alive on additional questions. Availability of information on gestational age (weeks) (58.1%) and birthweight (13.2%) was low amongst stillbirths, and heaping was common. Most women (93.9%) were able to report the sex of their stillborn baby. Response completeness for stillbirth timing (18.3-95.1%) and estimated proportion intrapartum (15.6-90.0%) varied by question and site. Congenital malformations were reported in 3.1% stillbirths. Perceived value in weighing a stillborn baby varied and barriers to weighing at birth a nd knowing birthweight were common.

CONCLUSIONS

Improving stillbirth data in surveys will require investment in improving the measurement of vital status, gestational age and birthweight by healthcare providers, communication of these with women, and overcoming reporting barriers. Given the large burden and effect on families, improved data must be made available to end preventable stillbirths.

摘要

背景

家庭调查仍然是死产数据的重要来源,但漏报和误报很常见。将不良妊娠结局归类为死产需要准确报告每一次妊娠的出生时生命体征以及胎龄或出生体重。进一步分类,例如按性别或时间(分娩期/分娩前),可以提高数据质量,以了解和预防死产。

方法

我们在孟加拉国、埃塞俄比亚、加纳、几内亚比绍和乌干达的五个卫生和人口监测系统地点进行了一项基于人群的横断面调查,调查对象为育龄妇女(2017-2018 年)。所有妇女都回答了一份完整的生育史和妊娠丢失问题(FBH+)或完整的妊娠史(FPH)。在这两组妇女中,有一部分被问到了其他死产问题。使用描述性措施评估问题。通过解释性范式和现象学方法,对探索报告死产出生体重障碍的妇女进行了焦点小组讨论。主题分析以预先设定的代码本为指导。

结果

共有 69176 名妇女报告了 98483 例活产(FBH+)和 102873 例妊娠(FPH)。对 1453 例死产、1528 例新生儿死亡和 12620 例在调查前 5 年内存活的儿童进行了进一步询问。现有的 FBH+/FPH 关于出生时生命体征和胎龄(月)的问题完整性很高(>99%)。在不同问题之间,关于出生时生命体征的不一致反应很常见;近四分之一在 FBH+/FPH 上被归类为死产的婴儿,在进一步的问题中被报告为活着出生。关于胎龄(周)(58.1%)和出生体重(13.2%)的信息可用性在死产中较低,且存在堆垛现象。大多数妇女(93.9%)能够报告其死产婴儿的性别。关于死产时间(18.3-95.1%)和估计分娩期比例(15.6-90.0%)的应答完整性因问题和地点而异。3.1%的死产报告有先天性畸形。对给死产婴儿称重的价值看法不一,在出生时称重和了解出生体重方面存在障碍。

结论

要改善调查中的死产数据,就需要投资于改善医疗服务提供者对生命体征、胎龄和出生体重的测量,与妇女沟通这些信息,并克服报告障碍。鉴于死产的巨大负担和对家庭的影响,必须提供更好的数据,以杜绝可预防的死产。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b9/7869203/ea3c0b423a63/12963_2020_239_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验