Suppr超能文献

大规模商品农业加剧了亚马逊森林砍伐对气候的影响。

Large-scale commodity agriculture exacerbates the climatic impacts of Amazonian deforestation.

机构信息

Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland;

Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 16;118(7). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023787118.

Abstract

In the Amazon rainforest, land use following deforestation is diverse and dynamic. Mounting evidence indicates that the climatic impacts of forest loss can also vary considerably, depending on specific features of the affected areas. The size of the deforested patches, for instance, was shown to modulate the characteristics of local climatic impacts. Nonetheless, the influence of different types of land use and management strategies on the magnitude of local climatic changes remains uncertain. Here, we evaluated the impacts of large-scale commodity farming and rural settlements on surface temperature, rainfall patterns, and energy fluxes. Our results reveal that changes in land-atmosphere coupling are induced not only by deforestation size but also, by land use type and management patterns inside the deforested areas. We provide evidence that, in comparison with rural settlements, deforestation caused by large-scale commodity agriculture is more likely to reduce convective rainfall and increase land surface temperature. We demonstrate that these differences are mainly caused by a more intensive management of the land, resulting in significantly lower vegetation cover throughout the year, which reduces latent heat flux. Our findings indicate an urgent need for alternative agricultural practices, as well as forest restoration, for maintaining ecosystem processes and mitigating change in the local climates across the Amazon basin.

摘要

在亚马逊雨林,森林砍伐后的土地利用是多样化且动态的。越来越多的证据表明,森林丧失的气候影响也因受影响地区的具体特征而有很大差异。例如,森林砍伐斑块的大小会调节当地气候影响的特征。尽管如此,不同类型的土地利用和管理策略对当地气候变化幅度的影响仍不确定。在这里,我们评估了大规模商品农业和农村定居点对地表温度、降雨模式和能量通量的影响。我们的结果表明,土地-大气耦合的变化不仅是由森林砍伐的大小引起的,还与森林砍伐区域内的土地利用类型和管理模式有关。我们有证据表明,与农村定居点相比,大规模商品农业造成的森林砍伐更有可能减少对流降雨并增加地表温度。我们证明,这些差异主要是由于土地的更密集管理造成的,导致全年植被覆盖显著降低,从而减少了潜热通量。我们的研究结果表明,迫切需要采用替代农业实践以及森林恢复措施,以维持亚马逊盆地整个地区的生态系统过程并减缓当地气候的变化。

相似文献

3
Deforestation scenarios for the Bolivian lowlands.玻利维亚低地的森林砍伐情景。
Environ Res. 2016 Jan;144(Pt B):49-63. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Forest fire size amplifies postfire land surface warming.森林火灾规模会加剧火灾后地表的升温。
Nature. 2024 Sep;633(8031):828-834. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07918-8. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
4
Amazon deforestation causes strong regional warming.亚马逊森林砍伐导致强烈的区域变暖。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Nov 7;120(45):e2309123120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2309123120. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
5
Structural complexity biases vegetation greenness measures.结构复杂性偏倚植被绿色度测量。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2023 Nov;7(11):1790-1798. doi: 10.1038/s41559-023-02187-6. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
6
Droughts and deforestation: Does seasonality matter?干旱和森林砍伐:季节性重要吗?
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276667. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Climatic impacts of bushland to cropland conversion in Eastern Africa.东非林地转为耕地对气候的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 15;717:137255. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137255. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
2
Near doubling of Brazil's intensive row crop area since 2000.巴西 2000 年以来集约型作物种植面积几乎翻了一番。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jan 8;116(2):428-435. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810301115. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
3
Classifying drivers of global forest loss.全球森林损失的驱动因素分类。
Science. 2018 Sep 14;361(6407):1108-1111. doi: 10.1126/science.aau3445.
4
The future of hyperdiverse tropical ecosystems.热带超多样性生态系统的未来。
Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7715):517-526. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0301-1. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
5
The tropical forest carbon cycle and climate change.热带森林碳循环与气候变化。
Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7715):527-534. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0300-2. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验