• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较在日本和美国获批的新药的安全性相关标签变更的决策和时机。

A comparison of decision and timing of safety related labeling changes for new drugs approved both in Japan and the United States.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine (Pharmaceutical Medicine), Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kitasato University, Minato-ku, Japan.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 May;30(5):561-572. doi: 10.1002/pds.5203. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1002/pds.5203
PMID:33559352
Abstract

PURPOSE

It is important to make the most up-to-date drug safety information available to the public in a timely manner so that health care professionals and patients can consider the information. The aim of the present study was to investigate the consistency and simultaneity of safety related updates in product labeling in Japan and the United States.

METHODS

New safety label changes that were made for new drugs approved concurrently both in Japan and the United States in the recent 5 years were identified and reviewed for concordance and time lag analysis. Factors associated with the time lag were also investigated.

RESULTS

Despite similar medical practices, population health and regulation in the countries, a low level of concordance (40/115, 34.8%) in the decision of labeling change was found in 31 new active substances. Only 3/40 (7.5%) of the concordant changes were made simultaneously. Labeling change orders issued by regulators and domestic postmarketing adverse event reports were associated with a significant difference in the timing of labeling change between the countries.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a low level of concordance between regulators in the decision of labeling changes and the timeliness of the changes. The low concordance and time lag highlighted the need for further international collaboration between regulators and industry and greater transparency in the decision-making process for the label change.

摘要

目的

及时向公众提供最新的药物安全信息非常重要,以便医疗保健专业人员和患者能够考虑这些信息。本研究旨在调查日本和美国药品标签中与安全性相关的更新的一致性和同步性。

方法

确定并审查了最近 5 年内日本和美国同时批准的新药的新安全标签变更,以进行一致性和时滞分析。还调查了与时滞相关的因素。

结果

尽管两国的医疗实践、人口健康和监管情况相似,但在 31 种新活性物质的标签变更决策中发现一致性水平较低(40/115,34.8%)。只有 3/40(7.5%)的一致变更同时进行。监管机构发布的标签变更令和国内上市后不良事件报告与两国标签变更时间的显著差异有关。

结论

我们发现监管机构在标签变更决策中的一致性水平和变更的及时性都较低。低一致性和时滞突出表明监管机构和行业之间需要进一步的国际合作,以及在标签变更决策过程中提高透明度。

相似文献

1
A comparison of decision and timing of safety related labeling changes for new drugs approved both in Japan and the United States.比较在日本和美国获批的新药的安全性相关标签变更的决策和时机。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 May;30(5):561-572. doi: 10.1002/pds.5203. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
2
A Comparison of Safety Information in Drug Labeling at the Initial Approval of New Drugs Approved Both in Japan and the United States.新药在美日获批时的药品标签初始批准安全性信息比较
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Sep;56(5):839-847. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00431-y. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
3
Decision and timing of safety-related labeling changes for new drugs in Japan: Comparison with the United States and the European Union.日本新药安全性相关标签变更的决策与时机:与美国和欧盟的比较。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 Dec;32(12):1331-1340. doi: 10.1002/pds.5664. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
4
Review of FDA Amendments Act Section 921 Experience in Posting Data-mining Results from the FAERS Database.美国食品和药物管理局修正案第 921 节对 FAERS 数据库数据挖掘结果公布经验的审查。
Clin Ther. 2021 Feb;43(2):380-395. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.12.011. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
5
Postmarket safety communications on drugs approved in Japan: A 25-year analysis.日本批准药物的上市后安全性通讯:25 年分析。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Apr;17(4):e13803. doi: 10.1111/cts.13803.
6
Assessment of the impact of scheduled postmarketing safety summary analyses on regulatory actions.评估定期上市后安全性总结分析对监管行动的影响。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Jul;100(1):102-8. doi: 10.1002/cpt.346. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
7
Analysis of safety-related regulatory actions by Japan's pharmaceutical regulatory agency.日本药品监管机构与安全相关监管行动分析。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Nov;26(11):1314-1320. doi: 10.1002/pds.4252. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
8
Effectiveness of drug postmarketing all-case surveillance as a safety measure in Japan.药品上市后全病例监测作为日本一项安全措施的有效性。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2021 Dec 16;12:20420986211065215. doi: 10.1177/20420986211065215. eCollection 2021.
9
Sources of Evidence Triggering and Supporting Safety-Related Labeling Changes: A 10-Year Longitudinal Assessment of 22 New Molecular Entities Approved in 2008 by the US Food and Drug Administration.引发并支持与安全性相关标签变更的证据来源:对美国食品药品监督管理局2008年批准的22种新分子实体进行的10年纵向评估
Drug Saf. 2022 Feb;45(2):169-180. doi: 10.1007/s40264-021-01142-3. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
10
An Interactive User Interface for Drug Labeling to Improve Readability and Decision-Making.用于药品标签的交互式用户界面,以提高可读性和决策能力。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015 Nov 5;2015:278-86. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Drugs associated with a risk of supraventricular tachycardia: analysis using the OpenVigil database.与室上性心动过速风险相关的药物:使用 OpenVigil 数据库进行分析。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Mar;52(3):3000605241238993. doi: 10.1177/03000605241238077.
2
A Comparison of Safety Information in Drug Labeling at the Initial Approval of New Drugs Approved Both in Japan and the United States.新药在美日获批时的药品标签初始批准安全性信息比较
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Sep;56(5):839-847. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00431-y. Epub 2022 Jul 25.