• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本批准药物的上市后安全性通讯:25 年分析。

Postmarket safety communications on drugs approved in Japan: A 25-year analysis.

机构信息

Clinical and Translational Research Center, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan.

Office of Pharmacovigilance, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Apr;17(4):e13803. doi: 10.1111/cts.13803.

DOI:10.1111/cts.13803
PMID:38651283
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11036129/
Abstract

Drug safety communications (DSCs) are essential tools for communicating important postmarket serious drug safety information to healthcare professionals and patients. Previous studies characterized DSCs issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA); however, knowledge about the activities of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA)/the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) is limited. This study characterized DSCs by the PMDA/MHLW in comparison with previously reported DSCs by the FDA and the EMA. We retrospectively analyzed 37 DSCs of 41 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for 33 drugs in Japan from 1997 to 2022. Most DSCs were related to non-oncology drugs (30/37, 81.1%), and the median (interquartile range) time from approval to DSC issuance was 19 (10-51) months. Notably, the regulatory review reports and the latest labels before DSC issuance did not describe 16/28 (57.1%) and 12/37 (32.4%) of the ADRs related to DSCs, respectively. Most DSCs resulted in label revisions (36/37, 97.3%) and seven drugs were eventually withdrawn. Some DSC characteristics are similar among the PMDA/MHLW, the FDA, and the EMA; however, the number, contents, and range of new safety issues addressed by DSCs differ among the three jurisdictions. Our study emphasized the importance of continuous efforts to gather postmarket drug safety information because substantial ADRs that led to DSCs were recognized after approval and were associated with critical label revisions and withdrawals. Future studies are required to address global challenges for regulatory harmonization of safety-related regulatory actions.

摘要

药品安全通讯(DSC)是向医疗保健专业人员和患者传达重要的上市后严重药物安全信息的重要工具。以前的研究已经对美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)发布的 DSC 进行了描述;然而,对日本药品和医疗器械管理局(PMDA)/厚生劳动省(MHLW)的活动的了解是有限的。本研究通过 PMDA/MHLW 与之前由 FDA 和 EMA 报告的 DSC 进行了比较。我们回顾性分析了 1997 年至 2022 年期间日本的 33 种药物的 41 种不良反应(ADR)共 37 份 DSC。大多数 DSC 与非肿瘤药物有关(30/37,81.1%),从批准到发布 DSC 的中位(四分位距)时间为 19(10-51)个月。值得注意的是,监管审查报告和 DSC 发布前的最新标签没有描述与 DSC 相关的 28 种 ADR 中的 16 种(57.1%)和 37 种 DSC 中的 12 种(32.4%)。大多数 DSC 导致标签修订(36/37,97.3%),最终有 7 种药物被撤市。PMDA/MHLW、FDA 和 EMA 之间存在一些 DSC 特征相似,但三者之间发布的新安全性问题的数量、内容和范围不同。本研究强调了不断努力收集上市后药物安全信息的重要性,因为在批准后发现了大量导致 DSC 的不良反应,这些不良反应与关键的标签修订和撤市有关。需要进一步研究以应对监管协调方面的全球挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b72/11036129/1998933e5d30/CTS-17-e13803-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b72/11036129/1998933e5d30/CTS-17-e13803-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b72/11036129/1998933e5d30/CTS-17-e13803-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Postmarket safety communications on drugs approved in Japan: A 25-year analysis.日本批准药物的上市后安全性通讯:25 年分析。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Apr;17(4):e13803. doi: 10.1111/cts.13803.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Assessment of the official national insurance coverage of regenerative medical products for ophthalmic diseases in Japan following regulatory approval.日本再生医疗产品获批上市后其眼科疾病官方医保覆盖情况评估。
Regen Ther. 2025 Jul 12;30:384-388. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2025.07.003. eCollection 2025 Dec.
4
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
5
Signals of Adverse Reactions to Herbal Medicines: Evidence and Document Analysis Based on a Scoping Review.草药不良反应信号:基于范围综述的证据与文献分析
Drug Saf. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01580-3.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
7
Visualization of FDA Adverse Drug Reaction Reports: Development and Usability Study of the VisDrugs Web Server.美国食品药品监督管理局不良药物反应报告的可视化:VisDrugs网络服务器的开发与可用性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 31;9:e71519. doi: 10.2196/71519.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
10
Summary of the comparative effectiveness review on off-label use of atypical antipsychotics.非典型抗精神病药物超说明书使用的比较有效性评价综述
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Jun;18(5 Suppl B):S1-20. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.S5-B.1.

本文引用的文献

1
Sources of Evidence Triggering and Supporting Safety-Related Labeling Changes: A 10-Year Longitudinal Assessment of 22 New Molecular Entities Approved in 2008 by the US Food and Drug Administration.引发并支持与安全性相关标签变更的证据来源:对美国食品药品监督管理局2008年批准的22种新分子实体进行的10年纵向评估
Drug Saf. 2022 Feb;45(2):169-180. doi: 10.1007/s40264-021-01142-3. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
2
Effectiveness of drug postmarketing all-case surveillance as a safety measure in Japan.药品上市后全病例监测作为日本一项安全措施的有效性。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2021 Dec 16;12:20420986211065215. doi: 10.1177/20420986211065215. eCollection 2021.
3
Evolving Landscape of New Drug Approval in Japan and Lags from International Birth Dates: Retrospective Regulatory Analysis.
日本新药审批格局的演变及其与国际上市日期的差距:回顾性监管分析。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 May;109(5):1265-1273. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2080. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
4
Effectiveness of Risk Minimization Measures to Prevent Pregnancy Exposure to Mycophenolate-Containing Medicines in Europe.欧洲预防孕期接触含霉酚酸药物的风险最小化措施的有效性。
Pharmaceut Med. 2019 Oct;33(5):395-406. doi: 10.1007/s40290-019-00304-0.
5
Varenicline and Nicotine Replacement Use Associated With US Food and Drug Administration Drug Safety Communications.伐仑克林和尼古丁替代疗法与美国食品和药物管理局药物安全通讯相关。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1910626. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10626.
6
Association Between Data Sources and US Food and Drug Administration Drug Safety Communications.数据来源与美国食品药品监督管理局药品安全通讯之间的关联
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Nov 1;179(11):1590-1592. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3066.
7
Evidence Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Drug Safety Communications.支持美国食品药品监督管理局药品安全通讯的证据。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Nov 1;179(11):1592. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3065.
8
Evaluating the impact of regulatory action on denosumab-induced hypocalcaemia in Japan.评估监管行动对日本依降钙素引起的低钙血症的影响。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Oct;44(5):788-795. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13004. Epub 2019 Jul 7.
9
Postmarket Safety Outcomes for New Molecular Entity (NME) Drugs Approved by the Food and Drug Administration Between 2002 and 2014.2002 年至 2014 年期间,美国食品和药物管理局批准的新型分子实体(NME)药物的上市后安全性结果。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Aug;104(2):390-400. doi: 10.1002/cpt.944. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
10
Postmarket Safety Events Among Novel Therapeutics Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Between 2001 and 2010.2001年至2010年间美国食品药品监督管理局批准的新型治疗药物的上市后安全事件
JAMA. 2017 May 9;317(18):1854-1863. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.5150.