Fenje N, Steward D J
Department of Anaesthesia, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital.
Can J Anaesth. 1988 Mar;35(2):198-201. doi: 10.1007/BF03010665.
A method of assessing the adhesive bond of tapes used to secure endotracheal (ET) tubes is described. Five kinds of tape and six different ET tubes including two silicone rubber, wire-reinforced tubes were tested. There are significant differences in the adhesive strength of different tapes, and in the adhesive bond formed by different ET tube materials. On the Portex clear ET tube, silk tape adhered best (p less than 0.001), followed by waterproof, cloth, dermiclear, and micropore tapes. Adhesive bonding by silk tape was significantly greater (p less than 0.001) for the three clear ET tubes (Portex clear, NCC clear, and Portex ivory) than for the Portex blue and the silicone rubber, wire-reinforced ET tubes. All tapes showed very poor or negligible adhesion to the Sheridan and Portex reinforced ET tubes. Adhesion to these tubes was greatly improved by wrapping them tightly with an "op site" dressing prior to applying tape.
本文描述了一种评估用于固定气管内（ET）导管的胶带粘结力的方法。测试了五种胶带和六种不同的ET导管，包括两种硅橡胶加钢丝增强导管。不同胶带的粘结强度以及不同ET导管材料形成的粘结力存在显著差异。在Portex透明ET导管上，丝绸胶带粘结效果最佳（p<0.001），其次是防水胶带、布胶带、皮肤清洁胶带和微孔胶带。对于三种透明ET导管（Portex透明、NCC透明和Portex象牙色），丝绸胶带的粘结力显著大于（p<0.001）Portex蓝色导管以及硅橡胶加钢丝增强ET导管。所有胶带对Sheridan和Portex增强ET导管的粘结力都非常差或可忽略不计。在粘贴胶带之前，先用“op site”敷料紧密包裹这些导管，可大大提高胶带对它们的粘结力。
