Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Eye and Ear University Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Department of Audiology and Neurotology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jun 1;21(3):229-244. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000735.
Olfactory dysfunction (OD) can be a single and early prominent symptom of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-COV-2 infection unlike middle east respiratory syndrome (MERS) and SARS. OD data are very informative but many are not peer-reviewed, often inconclusive and may reveal variable and sometimes contradictory results. This is often due to incongruent data of subjective and objective OD testing. Mechanistic pathways of OD and taste dysfunction (TD) are slowly unveiling, not infrequently extrapolated from historical models of SARS and MERS and are still partly unclear.
We reviewed the literature on OD and TD during the COVID-19 pandemic analyzing current data on pathogenesis and clinical correlates including prevalence, recovery rates, risk factors, and predictive power. Also, we evaluated various methods of subjective and objective olfactory testing and discussed challenges in management of patients with OD and rhinitis during the pandemic.
Subjective evaluation of smell disturbances during COVID-19 pandemic likely underestimates true prevalence, severity, and recovery rates of OD when compared to objective testing. OD is predictive of COVID-19 infection, more so when associated with TD. Recognizing inherent limitations of both subjective and objective OD and TD testing enables us better to manage chemosensory dysfunction in COVID-19 patients. Besides, current mechanistic data suggest neurotropism of COVID-19 for olfactory neuro-epithelium and a potential role of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels. Future studies are needed to explore further the neurogenic inflammation in COVID-19.
与中东呼吸综合征(MERS)和严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)不同,嗅觉功能障碍(OD)可能是严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型(SARS-CoV-2)感染的单一且早期突出症状。OD 数据非常有价值,但许多数据未经同行评审,往往没有定论,并且可能显示出不同且有时相互矛盾的结果。这通常是由于 OD 和味觉功能障碍(TD)的主观和客观测试数据不一致所致。OD 和 TD 的发病机制途径正在慢慢揭示,这些机制途径经常从 SARS 和 MERS 的历史模型推断而来,并且仍然部分不清楚。
我们回顾了 COVID-19 大流行期间的 OD 和 TD 文献,分析了当前关于发病机制和临床相关性的研究数据,包括患病率、恢复率、危险因素和预测能力。此外,我们评估了各种主观和客观嗅觉测试方法,并讨论了大流行期间 OD 和鼻炎患者的管理挑战。
与客观测试相比,COVID-19 大流行期间对嗅觉障碍的主观评估可能低估了 OD 的真实患病率、严重程度和恢复率。OD 可预测 COVID-19 感染,当与 TD 相关联时更是如此。认识到主观和客观 OD 和 TD 测试的固有局限性,可以使我们更好地管理 COVID-19 患者的嗅觉功能障碍。此外,目前的机制数据表明 COVID-19 对嗅觉神经上皮具有神经嗜性,以及瞬时受体电位(TRP)通道的潜在作用。需要进一步的研究来探索 COVID-19 中的神经炎症。