Río Cindy Johana Palacio-Del, Monti-Ballano Sofía, Lucha-López María Orosia, Hidalgo-García César, Tricás-Moreno José Miguel
Unidad de Investigación en Fisioterapia, Spin off Centro Clínico OMT-E Fisioterapia SLP, Universidad de Zaragoza, Domingo Miral s/n, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 4;13(13):1612. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131612.
This study aims to identify the effectiveness of exercise in chronic tension-type headache and chronic migraine. The PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes, Study design) strategy was followed, where P-patients with chronic tension-type headache or chronic migraine; I-exercise; C-conventional treatment; O-pain reduction; and S-RCTs (randomized controlled trials) and quasi-experimental trials. Studies with a high risk of bias according to the RoB 2 (Risk of Bias) scale and with a score < 6 according to the PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) scale were excluded. The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement was followed. The databases Pubmed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched in November 2024. The PEDro and RoB2 scales were used to assess the risk of bias and internal validity of the studies. The results were synthesized qualitatively. Ten studies with a total sample of 848 subjects were analyzed, comparing therapeutic interventions with an exercise versus conventional treatment. In most of the studies, the exercise group significantly outperformed the control group in pain reduction. The findings suggest that exercise improves central pain modulation and reinforces the potential of body strategies such as postural integration. The main limitations found were the limited evidence on exercise's role in chronic tension-type headache or migraine and the risk of bias due to the difficulty of blinding patients, therapists, and evaluators. The studies analyzed have shown that exercise could be an effective strategy to support the management of chronic tension-type headache and migraine.
本研究旨在确定运动对慢性紧张型头痛和慢性偏头痛的有效性。遵循了PICOS(人群、干预措施、对照、结局、研究设计)策略,其中P为慢性紧张型头痛或慢性偏头痛患者;I为运动;C为传统治疗;O为疼痛减轻;S为随机对照试验(RCT)和准实验性试验。根据RoB 2(偏倚风险)量表存在高偏倚风险且根据PEDro(物理治疗证据数据库)量表得分<6的研究被排除。遵循了PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)声明。于2024年11月检索了PubMed、科学网和Scopus数据库。使用PEDro和RoB2量表评估研究的偏倚风险和内部效度。对结果进行了定性综合分析。分析了10项研究,总样本量为848名受试者,比较了运动治疗干预与传统治疗。在大多数研究中,运动组在减轻疼痛方面明显优于对照组。研究结果表明,运动可改善中枢性疼痛调节,并增强诸如姿势整合等身体策略的潜力。发现的主要局限性在于,关于运动在慢性紧张型头痛或偏头痛中的作用的证据有限,以及由于难以对患者、治疗师和评估者进行盲法处理而存在偏倚风险。所分析的研究表明,运动可能是支持慢性紧张型头痛和偏头痛管理的有效策略。