Suppr超能文献

对于髋关节骨样骨瘤,哪种微创治疗方法最佳?系统评价和比例荟萃分析。

Which is the optimal minimally invasive treatment for osteoid osteoma of the hip? A systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.

机构信息

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom.

Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Orthop Sci. 2022 Mar;27(2):456-462. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.12.026. Epub 2021 Feb 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Osteoid osteomata comprise approximately 10% of benign bone tumours, with 20% of them being located in the proximal femur and 1-3% in the pelvis. In this meta-analysis, we sought to investigate positive and negative outcomes relating to minimally invasive surgery (MIS), which has superseded open resection and conservative measures over the last decades.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, CENTRAL and grey literature for completed studies published until 10 August 2020. Articles with a minimum of ten patients diagnosed with osteoid osteomata of the proximal femur and/or acetabulum were included. Primary outcomes were success rates, complications and recurrences following treatment. Delays in diagnosis were also recorded. We conducted random effects meta-analysis of success rates for MIS modalities using MedCalc statistical software. Quality was assessed with a modified Delphi checklist.

RESULTS

Sixteen case-series were identified. Success rates for computed-tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA), CT-guided percutaneous resection drilling and arthroscopic resection were 98.2% (95% CI 95.8-99.5), p = 0.47; 91.5% (95% CI 81.1-97.9), p = 0.06; and 98% (95% CI 89.3-99.7), p = 0.95, respectively. Both RFA and percutaneous drilling resection were associated with two iatrogenic femoral fractures. Arthroscopic removal was not associated with any complications. Definitive diagnosis was established at least six months after symptom onset in up to 43% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA could be the most effective treatment options for patients suffering from osteoid osteomata of the hip. Arthroscopy could be potentially as effective as RFA as long as further large-scale studies confirm its efficacy and safety. Reported complications stemming from these modalities were sparse in nature. In order to avoid inordinate diagnostic delays, a high index of suspicion and low threshold for CT scan investigation is required.

摘要

背景

骨样骨瘤约占良性骨肿瘤的 10%,其中 20%位于股骨近端,1-3%位于骨盆。在这项荟萃分析中,我们旨在研究与微创外科(MIS)相关的阳性和阴性结果,过去几十年中,MIS 已经取代了开放性切除和保守治疗。

方法

我们在 PubMed、CENTRAL 和灰色文献中搜索了截至 2020 年 8 月 10 日发表的已完成研究。纳入了至少有 10 例股骨近端和/或髋臼骨样骨瘤患者的文章。主要结果是治疗后的成功率、并发症和复发率。还记录了诊断延迟。我们使用 MedCalc 统计软件对 MIS 方式的成功率进行了随机效应荟萃分析。使用改良 Delphi 清单评估质量。

结果

确定了 16 项病例系列研究。CT 引导下射频消融(RFA)、CT 引导下经皮切除术和关节镜切除术的成功率分别为 98.2%(95%CI 95.8-99.5),p=0.47;91.5%(95%CI 81.1-97.9),p=0.06;和 98%(95%CI 89.3-99.7),p=0.95。RFA 和经皮切除术均与 2 例医源性股骨骨折有关。关节镜切除与任何并发症均无关。在多达 43%的患者中,明确诊断至少在症状出现后 6 个月确立。

结论

RFA 可能是髋部骨样骨瘤患者最有效的治疗选择。只要进一步的大规模研究证实其疗效和安全性,关节镜检查也可能与 RFA 一样有效。这些方法引起的报告并发症很少见。为了避免不必要的诊断延迟,需要高度怀疑并降低 CT 扫描检查的门槛。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验