Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Friends of Cancer Research, Washington, DC.
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 May 1;27(9):2408-2415. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3854. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
Restrictive eligibility criteria induce differences between clinical trial and "real-world" treatment populations. Restrictions based on prior therapies are common; minimizing them when appropriate may increase patient participation in clinical trials.
A multi-stakeholder working group developed a conceptual framework to guide evaluation of prevailing practices with respect to using prior treatment as selection criteria for clinical trials. The working group made recommendations to minimize restrictions based on prior therapies within the boundaries of scientific validity, patient centeredness, distributive justice, and beneficence.
(i) Patients are eligible for clinical trials regardless of the number or type of prior therapies and without requiring a specific therapy prior to enrollment unless a scientific or clinically based rationale is provided as justification. (ii) Prior therapy (either limits on number and type of prior therapies or requirements for specific therapies before enrollment) could be used to determine eligibility in the following cases: a) the agents being studied target a specific mechanism or pathway that could potentially interact with a prior therapy; b) the study design requires that all patients begin protocol-specified treatment at the same point in the disease trajectory; and c) in randomized clinical studies, if the therapy in the control arm is not appropriate for the patient due to previous therapies received. (iii) Trial designers should consider conducting evaluation separately from the primary endpoint analysis for participants who have received prior therapies.
Clinical trial sponsors and regulators should thoughtfully reexamine the use of prior therapy exposure as selection criteria to maximize clinical trial participation..
限制资格标准会导致临床试验和“真实世界”治疗人群之间存在差异。基于既往治疗的限制很常见;在适当的情况下尽量减少这些限制可能会增加患者参与临床试验的机会。
一个由多利益相关者组成的工作组制定了一个概念框架,以指导评估在临床试验中使用既往治疗作为选择标准的现行做法。工作组提出了建议,以便在科学有效性、以患者为中心、分配公正和行善的范围内,尽量减少基于既往治疗的限制。
(i)无论既往治疗的数量和类型如何,患者都有资格参加临床试验,并且在入组前不需要特定的治疗,除非有科学或临床依据作为理由。(ii)既往治疗(无论是限制既往治疗的数量和类型,还是在入组前需要特定的治疗)可用于以下情况下确定资格:a)正在研究的药物针对特定的机制或途径,可能与既往治疗相互作用;b)研究设计要求所有患者在疾病轨迹的同一点开始进行协议规定的治疗;c)在随机临床试验中,如果由于之前接受的治疗,对照组中的治疗不适合患者。(iii)试验设计者应考虑在主要终点分析之外,为接受过既往治疗的参与者单独进行评估。
临床试验赞助商和监管机构应认真重新考虑将既往治疗暴露作为选择标准的使用,以最大限度地提高临床试验参与度。