Suppr超能文献

临床研究纳入标准的现代化:ASCO-癌症研究之友先行治疗工作组的建议。

Modernizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Recommendations of the ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Prior Therapies Work Group.

机构信息

Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee.

Friends of Cancer Research, Washington, DC.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2021 May 1;27(9):2408-2415. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3854. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Restrictive eligibility criteria induce differences between clinical trial and "real-world" treatment populations. Restrictions based on prior therapies are common; minimizing them when appropriate may increase patient participation in clinical trials.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A multi-stakeholder working group developed a conceptual framework to guide evaluation of prevailing practices with respect to using prior treatment as selection criteria for clinical trials. The working group made recommendations to minimize restrictions based on prior therapies within the boundaries of scientific validity, patient centeredness, distributive justice, and beneficence.

RECOMMENDATIONS

(i) Patients are eligible for clinical trials regardless of the number or type of prior therapies and without requiring a specific therapy prior to enrollment unless a scientific or clinically based rationale is provided as justification. (ii) Prior therapy (either limits on number and type of prior therapies or requirements for specific therapies before enrollment) could be used to determine eligibility in the following cases: a) the agents being studied target a specific mechanism or pathway that could potentially interact with a prior therapy; b) the study design requires that all patients begin protocol-specified treatment at the same point in the disease trajectory; and c) in randomized clinical studies, if the therapy in the control arm is not appropriate for the patient due to previous therapies received. (iii) Trial designers should consider conducting evaluation separately from the primary endpoint analysis for participants who have received prior therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trial sponsors and regulators should thoughtfully reexamine the use of prior therapy exposure as selection criteria to maximize clinical trial participation..

摘要

目的

限制资格标准会导致临床试验和“真实世界”治疗人群之间存在差异。基于既往治疗的限制很常见;在适当的情况下尽量减少这些限制可能会增加患者参与临床试验的机会。

实验设计

一个由多利益相关者组成的工作组制定了一个概念框架,以指导评估在临床试验中使用既往治疗作为选择标准的现行做法。工作组提出了建议,以便在科学有效性、以患者为中心、分配公正和行善的范围内,尽量减少基于既往治疗的限制。

建议

(i)无论既往治疗的数量和类型如何,患者都有资格参加临床试验,并且在入组前不需要特定的治疗,除非有科学或临床依据作为理由。(ii)既往治疗(无论是限制既往治疗的数量和类型,还是在入组前需要特定的治疗)可用于以下情况下确定资格:a)正在研究的药物针对特定的机制或途径,可能与既往治疗相互作用;b)研究设计要求所有患者在疾病轨迹的同一点开始进行协议规定的治疗;c)在随机临床试验中,如果由于之前接受的治疗,对照组中的治疗不适合患者。(iii)试验设计者应考虑在主要终点分析之外,为接受过既往治疗的参与者单独进行评估。

结论

临床试验赞助商和监管机构应认真重新考虑将既往治疗暴露作为选择标准的使用,以最大限度地提高临床试验参与度。

相似文献

1
Modernizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Recommendations of the ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Prior Therapies Work Group.
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 May 1;27(9):2408-2415. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3854. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
3
Modernizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Recommendations of the ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Performance Status Work Group.
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 May 1;27(9):2424-2429. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3868. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
10
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

6
Advancements and challenges in developing in vivo CAR T cell therapies for cancer treatment.
EBioMedicine. 2024 Aug;106:105266. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105266. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
8
Addressing disparities in cancer clinical trials: a roadmap to more equitable accrual.
Front Health Serv. 2024 Mar 8;4:1254294. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1254294. eCollection 2024.
9

本文引用的文献

1
Redrawing the Lines: The Next Generation of Treatment in Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:e8-e21. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_237419. Epub 2019 May 17.
2
Choosing wisely first line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): what to add and what to leave out.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2019 May;75:39-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
4
Seamless Designs: Current Practice and Considerations for Early-Phase Drug Development in Oncology.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Feb 1;111(2):118-128. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy196.
5
Lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a global phase 2 study.
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):1654-1667. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30649-1. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
6
Brigatinib versus Crizotinib in ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):2027-2039. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810171. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
7
Ethical Considerations in Adaptive Design Clinical Trials.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017 Mar;51(2):190-199. doi: 10.1177/2168479016667766. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
8
Making the first move in EGFR-driven or ALK-driven NSCLC: first-generation or next-generation TKI?
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov;15(11):694-708. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0081-4.
9
Brigatinib in Patients With Alectinib-Refractory ALK-Positive NSCLC.
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Oct;13(10):1530-1538. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
10
BRAF in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Pickaxing another brick in the wall.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2018 May;66:82-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.04.006. Epub 2018 Apr 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验