Bevelacqua J J, Welsh J, Mortazavi S A R, Keshavarz M, Mortazavi S M J
PhD, Bevelacqua Resources, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
MD, PhD, Loyola University Chicago, Edward Hines Jr., VA Hospital, Stritch School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Maywood, IL 60153 USA.
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2021 Feb 1;11(1):103-108. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2005-1115. eCollection 2021 Feb.
There is a growing interest in examining alterations in telomere length as a reliable biomarker of general health, as well as a marker for predicting later morbidity and mortality. Substantial evidence shows that telomere length is associated with aging; telomere shortening acts as a "counting mechanism" that drives replicative senescence by limiting the mitotic potential of normal (but not malignant) cells. In this Correspondence, we attempt to answer the question of why recently published papers about telomere length alterations increase our uncertainty rather than reduce it. This discussion includes three major research areas regarding telomere length: environmental stressors, aging, and life span. Our review suggests that activation of telomerase activity due to stressors in space might be a double-edged sword with both favorable and unfavorable consequences. The selection of an effect's consequence must clearly elucidate the experimental conditions as well as associated stressors. In this Correspondence, we attempt to answer the question of why recently published papers about telomere length alterations increase our uncertainty rather than reduce it. The selection of an effect's consequence must clearly elucidate the experimental conditions as well as associated stressors. Both positive and negative consequences must be clearly addressed in order to bolster the conclusions, as well as identify future research directions.
将端粒长度的改变作为总体健康的可靠生物标志物以及预测后期发病和死亡的标志物来进行研究,正受到越来越多的关注。大量证据表明端粒长度与衰老相关;端粒缩短充当一种“计数机制”,通过限制正常(而非恶性)细胞的有丝分裂潜能来驱动复制性衰老。在这篇通信文章中,我们试图回答为何最近发表的关于端粒长度改变的论文增加了我们的不确定性而非减少了它这一问题。该讨论涵盖了关于端粒长度的三个主要研究领域:环境应激源、衰老和寿命。我们的综述表明,太空应激源导致的端粒酶活性激活可能是一把双刃剑,具有有利和不利的后果。对一种效应后果的选择必须清楚地阐明实验条件以及相关应激源。在这篇通信文章中,我们试图回答为何最近发表的关于端粒长度改变的论文增加了我们的不确定性而非减少了它这一问题。对一种效应后果的选择必须清楚地阐明实验条件以及相关应激源。为了加强结论并确定未来的研究方向,必须清楚地探讨正反两方面的后果。