• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解亚马逊地区的水和能量通量:来自观测-模型对比的经验。

Understanding water and energy fluxes in the Amazonia: Lessons from an observation-model intercomparison.

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

School of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Glob Chang Biol. 2021 May;27(9):1802-1819. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15555. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1111/gcb.15555
PMID:33565692
Abstract

Tropical forests are an important part of global water and energy cycles, but the mechanisms that drive seasonality of their land-atmosphere exchanges have proven challenging to capture in models. Here, we (1) report the seasonality of fluxes of latent heat (LE), sensible heat (H), and outgoing short and longwave radiation at four diverse tropical forest sites across Amazonia-along the equator from the Caxiuanã and Tapajós National Forests in the eastern Amazon to a forest near Manaus, and from the equatorial zone to the southern forest in Reserva Jaru; (2) investigate how vegetation and climate influence these fluxes; and (3) evaluate land surface model performance by comparing simulations to observations. We found that previously identified failure of models to capture observed dry-season increases in evapotranspiration (ET) was associated with model overestimations of (1) magnitude and seasonality of Bowen ratios (relative to aseasonal observations in which sensible was only 20%-30% of the latent heat flux) indicating model exaggerated water limitation, (2) canopy emissivity and reflectance (albedo was only 10%-15% of incoming solar radiation, compared to 0.15%-0.22% simulated), and (3) vegetation temperatures (due to underestimation of dry-season ET and associated cooling). These partially compensating model-observation discrepancies (e.g., higher temperatures expected from excess Bowen ratios were partially ameliorated by brighter leaves and more interception/evaporation) significantly biased seasonal model estimates of net radiation (R ), the key driver of water and energy fluxes (LE ~ 0.6 R and H ~ 0.15 R ), though these biases varied among sites and models. A better representation of energy-related parameters associated with dynamic phenology (e.g., leaf optical properties, canopy interception, and skin temperature) could improve simulations and benchmarking of current vegetation-atmosphere exchange and reduce uncertainty of regional and global biogeochemical models.

摘要

热带雨林是全球水热循环的重要组成部分,但驱动其地气交换季节性的机制在模型中难以捕捉。在这里,我们(1)报告了在亚马逊地区四个不同的热带森林站点的潜热(LE)、显热(H)和长、短波外逸辐射通量的季节性变化——从亚马逊东部的卡西亚万纳和塔帕若斯国家森林到马瑙斯附近的森林,再到杰鲁保护区的南部森林,跨越了赤道;(2)调查了植被和气候如何影响这些通量;(3)通过将模拟与观测进行比较,评估陆地表面模型的性能。我们发现,先前模型未能捕捉到观测到的旱季蒸散量(ET)增加的情况,这与模型对(1)比辐射率(Bowen 比)的幅度和季节性的高估有关(与季节性观测相比,Bowen 比中显热仅占潜热通量的 20%-30%,表明模型夸大了水分限制),(2)冠层发射率和反射率(反照率仅为入射太阳辐射的 10%-15%,而模拟值为 0.15%-0.22%),(3)植被温度(由于低估了旱季 ET 以及相关的冷却)。这些部分补偿了模型观测之间的差异(例如,过高的 Bowen 比预计会导致更高的温度,但较亮的叶片和更多的截留/蒸发会部分缓解),显著偏向了季节性模型对净辐射(R)的估计,净辐射是水热通量的关键驱动因素(LE0.6R 和 H0.15R),尽管这些偏差在不同的站点和模型之间有所不同。更好地代表与动态物候学相关的能量相关参数(例如,叶片光学特性、冠层截留和表皮温度)可以改善当前植被-大气交换的模拟和基准测试,并减少区域和全球生物地球化学模型的不确定性。

相似文献

1
Understanding water and energy fluxes in the Amazonia: Lessons from an observation-model intercomparison.理解亚马逊地区的水和能量通量:来自观测-模型对比的经验。
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 May;27(9):1802-1819. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15555. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
2
Do dynamic global vegetation models capture the seasonality of carbon fluxes in the Amazon basin? A data-model intercomparison.动态全球植被模型能否捕捉到亚马逊流域碳通量的季节性?一项数据-模型对比研究。
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Jan;23(1):191-208. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13442. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
3
The exchange of water and energy between a tropical peat forest and the atmosphere: Seasonal trends and comparison against other tropical rainforests.热带泥炭林与大气之间的水热交换:季节变化趋势及与其他热带雨林的比较。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Sep 15;683:166-174. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.217. Epub 2019 May 20.
4
Asymmetric response of Amazon forest water and energy fluxes to wet and dry hydrological extremes reveals onset of a local drought-induced tipping point.亚马逊森林水分和能量通量对干湿水文极端事件的不对称响应揭示了局部干旱引发的临界点的出现。
Glob Chang Biol. 2023 Nov;29(21):6077-6092. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16933. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
5
Seasonal variation of surface radiation and energy balances over two contrasting areas of the seasonally dry tropical forest (Caatinga) in the Brazilian semi-arid.季节性干旱热带森林(巴西半干旱地区的卡廷加)两个对比区域的地表辐射和能量平衡的季节性变化。
Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Jul 16;192(8):524. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-08484-y.
6
Climate-driven uncertainties in modeling terrestrial energy and water fluxes: a site-level to global-scale analysis.气候驱动因素对陆地能量和水通量模型的不确定性:从站点尺度到全球尺度的分析。
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Jun;20(6):1885-900. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12473. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
7
Reforestation and surface cooling in temperate zones: Mechanisms and implications.温带地区的造林和地表冷却:机制与意义。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Jun;26(6):3384-3401. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15069. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
8
Can changes in land use in a semi-arid region of Brazil cause seasonal variation in energy partitioning and evapotranspiration?巴西半干旱地区土地利用的变化会引起能量分配和蒸散的季节性变化吗?
J Environ Manage. 2024 Sep;367:121959. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121959. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
9
Do the energy fluxes and surface conductance of boreal coniferous forests in Europe scale with leaf area?欧洲北方针叶林的能量通量和表面传导是否与叶面积成正比?
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Dec;22(12):4096-4113. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13497. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
10
Grazing effects on surface energy fluxes in a desert steppe on the Mongolian Plateau.放牧对蒙古高原荒漠草原地表能量通量的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2017 Mar;27(2):485-502. doi: 10.1002/eap.1459. Epub 2017 Feb 17.