• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婴儿在没有身体优势的情况下对社会等级的表现。

Infants' representation of social hierarchies in absence of physical dominance.

机构信息

Center for Brain and Cognition (CBC), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 10;16(2):e0245450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245450. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0245450
PMID:33566835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7875356/
Abstract

Social hierarchies are ubiquitous in all human relations since birth, but little is known about how they emerge during infancy. Previous studies have shown that infants can represent hierarchical relationships when they arise from the physical superiority of one agent over the other, but humans have the capacity to allocate social status in others through cues that not necessary entail agents' physical formidability. Here we investigate infants' capacity to recognize the social status of different agents when there are no observable cues of physical dominance. Our results evidence that a first presentation of the agents' social power when obtaining resources is enough to allow infants predict the outputs of their future. Nevertheless, this capacity arises later (at 18 month-olds but not at 15 month-olds) than showed in previous studies, probably due the increased complexity of the inferences needed to make the predictions.

摘要

社会等级在人类出生后就无处不在,但对于它们是如何在婴儿期出现的,人们知之甚少。之前的研究表明,当一个代理人在身体上优于另一个代理人时,婴儿可以表示出等级关系,但人类有能力通过不需要代理人身体威慑力的线索来赋予他人社会地位。在这里,我们研究了当没有可观察到的身体优势线索时,婴儿识别不同代理人社会地位的能力。我们的研究结果表明,当代理人在获得资源时第一次表现出社会权力,就足以让婴儿预测他们未来的结果。然而,这种能力出现得较晚(18 个月大,但 15 个月大时不会),这可能是由于做出预测所需的推理复杂性增加所致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6291/7875356/b0c47ee6160a/pone.0245450.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6291/7875356/960372199aa4/pone.0245450.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6291/7875356/b0c47ee6160a/pone.0245450.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6291/7875356/960372199aa4/pone.0245450.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6291/7875356/b0c47ee6160a/pone.0245450.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Infants' representation of social hierarchies in absence of physical dominance.婴儿在没有身体优势的情况下对社会等级的表现。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 10;16(2):e0245450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245450. eCollection 2021.
2
The developmental origins of social hierarchy: how infants and young children mentally represent and respond to power and status.社会等级的发展起源:婴儿和幼儿如何在心理上表示和回应权力和地位。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Jun;33:201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.044. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
3
Human infants' learning of social structures: the case of dominance hierarchy.人类婴儿对社会结构的学习:以优势等级制度为例。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;25(1):250-5. doi: 10.1177/0956797613500509. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
4
Representation of stable social dominance relations by human infants.人类婴儿对稳定社会支配关系的表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 1;109(18):6862-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113194109. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
5
Transitive inference of social dominance by human infants.人类婴儿对社会支配关系的传递性推理。
Dev Sci. 2017 Mar;20(2). doi: 10.1111/desc.12367. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
6
Human and animal dominance hierarchies show a pyramidal structure guiding adult and infant social inferences.人类和动物的统治等级结构表现出一种金字塔结构,指导着成人和婴儿的社会推断。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Aug;7(8):1294-1306. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01634-5. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
7
Big and mighty: preverbal infants mentally represent social dominance.大而有力:前语言婴儿在心理上代表社会支配地位。
Science. 2011 Jan 28;331(6016):477-80. doi: 10.1126/science.1199198.
8
The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.婴儿期朴素心理学的发展起源。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03702-1.
9
Space and rank: infants expect agents in higher position to be socially dominant.空间和地位:婴儿期望处于更高位置的主体具有社会支配地位。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Oct 9;286(1912):20191674. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1674.
10
Infants use relative numerical group size to infer social dominance.婴儿利用相对数字组大小来推断社会等级。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 1;113(9):2376-81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1514879113. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
How do preschoolers and adults ascribe authority?学龄前儿童和成年人是如何赋予权威的?
iScience. 2025 Aug 7;28(9):113279. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113279. eCollection 2025 Sep 19.
2
Toddlers' sensitivity to dominance traits from faces.幼儿对面部优势特征的敏感性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 15;13(1):22292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49385-7.
3
Human and animal dominance hierarchies show a pyramidal structure guiding adult and infant social inferences.人类和动物的统治等级结构表现出一种金字塔结构,指导着成人和婴儿的社会推断。

本文引用的文献

1
Infants distinguish between leaders and bullies.婴儿能区分领导者和霸凌者。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 18;115(38):E8835-E8843. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1801677115. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
2
'To the victor go the spoils': Infants expect resources to align with dominance structures.“胜者为王,败者为寇”:婴儿期望资源分配与优势结构相一致。
Cognition. 2017 Jul;164:8-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
3
The boss is always right: Preschoolers endorse the testimony of a dominant over that of a subordinate.
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Aug;7(8):1294-1306. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01634-5. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
4
Children's social evaluation toward prestige-based and dominance-based powerholders.儿童对基于威望和基于支配的权力持有者的社会评价。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 May 15;15(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06072-6.
5
Dominance in humans.人类的统治地位。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Feb 28;377(1845):20200451. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0451. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
老板总是正确的:学龄前儿童更认可占主导地位者的证词而非从属者的证词。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Dec;152:307-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
4
Infants use relative numerical group size to infer social dominance.婴儿利用相对数字组大小来推断社会等级。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 1;113(9):2376-81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1514879113. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
5
Statistical treatment of looking-time data.注视时间数据的统计处理。
Dev Psychol. 2016 Apr;52(4):521-36. doi: 10.1037/dev0000083. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
6
The role of physical formidability in human social status allocation.身体强壮程度在人类社会地位分配中的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Mar;110(3):385-406. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000042. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
7
Transitive inference of social dominance by human infants.人类婴儿对社会支配关系的传递性推理。
Dev Sci. 2017 Mar;20(2). doi: 10.1111/desc.12367. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
8
Leadership in Mammalian Societies: Emergence, Distribution, Power, and Payoff.哺乳动物社会中的领导力:出现、分布、权力和回报。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 Jan;31(1):54-66. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.013. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
9
The influence of power and reason on young Maya children's endorsement of testimony.权力和理性对玛雅幼儿认可证词的影响。
Dev Sci. 2016 Nov;19(6):957-966. doi: 10.1111/desc.12336. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
10
Understanding social hierarchies: The neural and psychological foundations of status perception.理解社会等级制度:地位认知的神经和心理基础。
Soc Neurosci. 2015;10(5):527-50. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1013223. Epub 2015 Feb 20.