Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, National Center for Global Health and Medicine (NCGM), Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Plastic Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
J Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr;123(5):1232-1237. doi: 10.1002/jso.26421. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
The internal mammary artery/vein (IMA/V) are commonly used recipients for free flap breast reconstruction, but requires costal cartilage resection and limits future use of the IMA. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of the thoracoacromial artery/vein (TAA/V) as recipients for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction compared with using the IMA/V.
Medical charts of patients who underwent free DIEP flap breast reconstruction using the TAA/V or the IMA/V as recipient vessels were reviewed. Patient and vessel characteristics, time for vessel preparation and anastomosis, and postoperative pain were compared between TAA/V and IMA/V groups.
Thirty-four patients were included; 12 in TAA/V group, and 22 in IMA/V group. There was no flap failure in both groups. There were statistically significant differences between TAA/V and IMA/V groups in vessel preparation time (10.9 ± 3.7 min vs. 24.1 ± 6.0 min, p < .001), anastomosis time (31.2 ± 12.1 min vs. 42.1 ± 11.2 min, p = .017), and total dose of acetaminophen (4566.7 ± 1015.6 mg vs. 5436.4 ± 1323.3 mg, p = .041).
The TAA/V could be safely used as recipient vessels for DIEP flap breast reconstruction with shorter time and less postoperative pain.
内乳动脉/静脉(IMA/V)通常被用作游离皮瓣乳房重建的受体,但需要切除肋软骨,并限制了 IMA 的未来使用。本研究旨在评估胸廓肩峰动脉/静脉(TAA/V)作为深下腹壁穿支皮瓣(DIEP)乳房重建受体的可行性,与使用 IMA/V 相比。
回顾了使用 TAA/V 或 IMA/V 作为受体血管行游离 DIEP 皮瓣乳房重建的患者的病历。比较 TAA/V 组和 IMA/V 组患者和血管特征、血管准备和吻合时间以及术后疼痛。
共纳入 34 例患者,其中 TAA/V 组 12 例,IMA/V 组 22 例。两组均无皮瓣失败。TAA/V 组和 IMA/V 组在血管准备时间(10.9 ± 3.7 分钟比 24.1 ± 6.0 分钟,p < 0.001)、吻合时间(31.2 ± 12.1 分钟比 42.1 ± 11.2 分钟,p = 0.017)和对乙酰氨基酚总剂量(4566.7 ± 1015.6 毫克比 5436.4 ± 1323.3 毫克,p = 0.041)方面存在统计学差异。
TAA/V 可安全用于 DIEP 皮瓣乳房重建,手术时间更短,术后疼痛更轻。