Unit of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
J Endourol. 2021 Nov;35(11):1675-1683. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.1189. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is considered a safe and effective treatment in case of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Despite technical execution has evolved over time, from the standard to the more recent approaches, data comparing these two techniques are missing. The aim of the present study was to describe our HoLEP with technique and compare peri- and postoperative results with the classical approach in a single referral center. We prospectively analyzed all consecutive cases between 2017 and 2019 divided according to the type of approach. Patients were preoperatively studied through instrumental assessment and clinical evaluation, using validated questionnaires and then postoperatively at specific time frames. Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate possible predictor of continuous variables. All the procedures were carried out by one single expert surgeon. Overall, 168 patients were included, of which 81 were treated with classical and 87 with with technique. The two cohorts were comparable related to preoperative features and postoperative complication rate. Mean enucleation time (ET), lasing time, amount of energy delivered, and overall operative time were significantly lower in procedures ( < 0.05). Stepwise multivariable linear regression showed that strategy can significantly predict shorter ET and lower energy delivered. Stress incontinence rate at 1-month follow-up was found to be significantly reduced in the group, compared with the counterpart. Both techniques are effective and safe treatment options for BOO, since peri- and postoperative surgical and functional outcomes were favorable. strategy may significantly decrease ET and the amount of energy delivered leading to a reduced early stress incontinence rate compared with the standard approach.
钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)被认为是治疗膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)的安全有效的方法。尽管技术执行随着时间的推移已经发展,从标准的到最近的技术,但比较这两种技术的数据仍然缺乏。本研究的目的是描述我们使用技术的 HoLEP,并在单转诊中心将其与经典方法的围手术期结果进行比较。我们前瞻性地分析了 2017 年至 2019 年期间根据手术方式分为两组的所有连续病例。患者在术前通过仪器评估和临床评估进行研究,使用经过验证的问卷,然后在特定时间框架进行术后评估。进行线性回归分析以评估连续变量的可能预测因子。所有手术均由一位专家外科医生进行。总体而言,共纳入 168 例患者,其中 81 例采用经典方法治疗,87 例采用技术治疗。两组患者在术前特征和术后并发症发生率方面具有可比性。手术时间、激光时间、能量消耗和总手术时间在技术组中明显较低(<0.05)。逐步多元线性回归显示策略可以显著预测较短的手术时间和较低的能量消耗。与对照组相比,在 1 个月随访时,技术组的压力性尿失禁发生率明显降低。两种技术都是治疗 BOO 的有效和安全方法,因为围手术期手术和功能结果都很好。与标准方法相比,策略可以显著减少手术时间和能量消耗,从而降低早期压力性尿失禁的发生率。