Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, University Hospital, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 10;22(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04035-9.
Annually in the UK, 40,000-90,000 people are involved in a traumatic incident. Severity of injury and how well people recover from their injuries varies, with physiotherapy playing a key role in the rehabilitation process. Recovery is evaluated using multiple outcome measures for perceived levels of pain severity and quality of life. It is unclear however, what constitutes a successful recovery from injury throughout the course of recovery from the patient perspective, and whether this aligns with physiotherapists' perspectives.
A qualitative study using two approaches: Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis following the Kreuger framework for focus groups. A purposive sample of 20 patients who have experienced musculoskeletal trauma within the past 4 weeks and 12 physiotherapists who manage this patient population will be recruited from a single trauma centre in the UK. Semi-structured interviews with patients at 4 weeks, 6 and 12 months following injury, and 2 focus groups with physiotherapists will be undertaken at one time point. Views and perceptions on the definition of recovery and what constitutes a successful recovery will be explored using both methods, with a focus on the lived experience and patient journey following musculoskeletal trauma, and how this changes through the process of recovery. Data from both the semi-structured interviews and focus groups will be analysed separately and then integrated and synthesised into key themes ensuring similarities and differences are identified. Strategies to ensure trustworthiness e.g., reflexivity will be employed.
Recovery following musculoskeletal trauma is complex and understanding of the concept of successful recovery and how this changes over time following an injury is largely unknown. It is imperative to understand the patient perspective and whether these perceptions align with current views of physiotherapists. A greater understanding of recovery following musculoskeletal trauma has potential to change clinical care, optimise patient centred care and improve efficiency and clinical decision making during rehabilitation. This in turn can contribute to improved clinical effectiveness, patient outcome and patient satisfaction with potential service and economic cost savings. This study has ethical approval (IRAS 287781/REC 20/PR/0712).
在英国,每年有 4 万人至 9 万人遭遇创伤性事件。受伤的严重程度以及人们从受伤中恢复的情况因人而异,而物理治疗在康复过程中起着关键作用。康复情况通过多种结果测量来评估,包括感知疼痛严重程度和生活质量。然而,从患者的角度来看,什么构成了受伤后的成功康复,以及这是否与物理治疗师的观点一致,目前还不清楚。
本研究采用两种方法进行定性研究:使用半结构化访谈的解释现象学分析(IPA)和基于 Kreuger 框架的焦点小组主题分析。将从英国一家创伤中心招募 20 名在过去 4 周内经历过肌肉骨骼创伤的患者和 12 名管理此类患者人群的物理治疗师作为研究对象。将在受伤后 4 周、6 周和 12 周对患者进行半结构化访谈,并在同一时间点进行 2 次物理治疗师焦点小组讨论。将使用这两种方法探讨对康复定义和成功康复的看法,重点关注肌肉骨骼创伤后的生活体验和患者康复历程,以及这一过程如何变化。将对来自半结构化访谈和焦点小组的资料分别进行分析,然后进行整合和综合,形成关键主题,以确定相似之处和差异。将采用确保可信度的策略,例如反思。
肌肉骨骼创伤后的康复过程较为复杂,对于成功康复的概念以及受伤后随着时间的推移这种概念如何变化,人们知之甚少。了解患者的观点以及这些观点是否与当前物理治疗师的观点一致至关重要。对肌肉骨骼创伤后康复的深入了解有可能改变临床护理,优化以患者为中心的护理,并在康复过程中提高效率和临床决策。这反过来又有助于提高临床效果、患者结局和患者对服务的满意度,并可能带来经济效益。本研究已获得伦理批准(IRAS 287781/REC 20/PR/0712)。