• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
General practitioners' views and experiences in caring for patients after sepsis: a qualitative interview study.全科医生在脓毒症患者护理方面的观点和经验:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 10;11(2):e040533. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040533.
2
General practitioners' continuation and acceptance of medication changes at sectorial transitions of geriatric patients - a qualitative interview study.全科医生对老年患者在医疗部门过渡时用药变化的延续与接受情况——一项定性访谈研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Oct 12;19(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0855-x.
3
How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs' view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany.如何做出充分的决策?德国柏林全科医生对自行就诊和医生转诊急诊就诊决策的看法的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 2;9(4):e026786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026786.
4
General practitioners' experiences with out-of-hours cardiorespiratory consultations: a qualitative study.全科医生非工作时间心肺咨询的经验:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 12;6(8):e012136. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012136.
5
GPs' views on the use of depression screening and GP-targeted feedback: a qualitative study.全科医生对使用抑郁筛查和以全科医生为目标的反馈的看法:一项定性研究。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):3279-3286. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02703-2. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
6
The specific needs of patients following sepsis: a nested qualitative interview study.脓毒症后患者的特殊需求:一项嵌套式定性访谈研究
BJGP Open. 2017 Jan 9;1(1):bjgpopen17X100725. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen17X100725.
7
French general practitioners' attitude towards breast cancer in older women: A qualitative study.法国全科医生对老年女性乳腺癌的态度:一项定性研究。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2021 Sep;12(7):1076-1084. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 May 25.
8
General practitioners' and nurses' views on medication reviews and potentially inappropriate medicines in elderly patients - a qualitative study of reports by educating pharmacists.全科医生和护士对老年患者药物评估及潜在不适当用药的看法——一项基于药师教育报告的定性研究
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Sep;36(3):329-341. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1487458. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
9
GP experience and understandings of providing follow-up care in prostate cancer survivors in England.英国全科医生在前列腺癌幸存者随访护理方面的经验和认识。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Sep;28(5):1468-1478. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12969. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
10
General practitioners' knowledge of leg ulcer treatment in primary healthcare: an interview study.全科医生在初级医疗保健中对下肢溃疡治疗的知识:一项访谈研究。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2020 Sep 24;21:e34. doi: 10.1017/S1463423620000274.

引用本文的文献

1
Transitional care after hospitalization for sepsis in Germany- results from the population-based AVENIR cohort study.德国脓毒症住院后的过渡性护理——基于人群的AVENIR队列研究结果
Infection. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1007/s15010-025-02589-7.
2
Supporting Post-ICU Recovery: A Narrative Review for General Practitioners.支持重症监护病房后的康复:全科医生的叙述性综述
Diseases. 2025 Jun 11;13(6):183. doi: 10.3390/diseases13060183.
3
Improving Outcomes in Survivors of Sepsis-The Transition from Secondary to Primary Care, and the Role of Primary Care: A Narrative Review.改善脓毒症幸存者的预后——从二级医疗向初级医疗的过渡以及初级医疗的作用:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 9;14(8):2582. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082582.
4
Barriers and facilitators to optimal sepsis care - a systematized review of healthcare professionals' perspectives.优化脓毒症护理的障碍与促进因素——对医疗专业人员观点的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 24;25(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12777-8.
5
Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Sepsis Care Pathways-Qualitative Pilot Expert Interviews.医疗保健专业人员对脓毒症护理路径的看法——定性试点专家访谈
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 18;14(2):619. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020619.
6
Factors to consider when designing post-hospital interventions to support critical illness recovery: Systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.设计院后干预措施以支持危重症康复时需考虑的因素:系统评价与定性证据综合分析
J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 Jan 3;26(1):80-95. doi: 10.1177/17511437241308674. eCollection 2025 Feb.
7
Care pathways of sepsis survivors: sequelae, mortality and use of healthcare services in France, 2015-2018.脓毒症幸存者的护理路径:法国 2015-2018 年的后遗症、死亡率和医疗保健服务利用情况。
Crit Care. 2023 Nov 10;27(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04726-w.
8
Facilitating high quality acute care in resource-constrained environments: Perspectives of patients recovering from sepsis, their caregivers and healthcare workers in Uganda and Malawi.在资源有限的环境中促进高质量急性护理:乌干达和马拉维败血症康复患者、其护理人员及医护人员的观点
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Aug 15;2(8):e0000272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000272. eCollection 2022.
9
Hospital Discharge Summaries Are Insufficient Following ICU Stays: A Qualitative Study.重症监护病房(ICU)住院后医院出院小结内容不足:一项定性研究
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Jun 9;4(6):e0715. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000715. eCollection 2022 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Covid-19: the challenge of patient rehabilitation after intensive care.新冠疫情:重症监护后患者康复面临的挑战。
BMJ. 2020 May 6;369:m1787. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1787.
2
Stimulated by insight: Exploration of critical care nurses' experience of research participation in a recovery programme for intensive care survivors.受启发而产生的思考:探索重症监护护士参与重症监护幸存者康复计划的研究体验。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Apr;29(7-8):1312-1322. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15193. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
3
Post-Intensive Care Unit Care. A Qualitative Analysis of Patient Priorities and Implications for Redesign.重症监护病房后护理。患者优先事项的定性分析及其对重新设计的意义。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Feb;17(2):221-228. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201904-332OC.
4
"Never in my mind to give up!" A qualitative study of long-term intensive care patients' inner strength and willpower-Promoting and challenging aspects.“永不放弃!”一项对长期重症监护患者内在力量和意志力的定性研究——促进和挑战的方面。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Nov;28(21-22):3991-4003. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14980. Epub 2019 Jul 14.
5
Identifying patients' support needs following critical illness: a scoping review of the qualitative literature.确定危重病患者的支持需求:定性文献的范围综述。
Crit Care. 2019 May 24;23(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2441-6.
6
Dutch ICU survivors have more consultations with general practitioners before and after ICU admission compared to a matched control group from the general population.荷兰 ICU 幸存者在入住 ICU 前后与普通人群中的匹配对照组相比,与全科医生的咨询次数更多。
PLoS One. 2019 May 23;14(5):e0217225. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217225. eCollection 2019.
7
A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis on the risks of medical discharge letters for patients' safety.关于医疗出院小结对患者安全风险的系统文献综述与叙述性综合分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3989-1.
8
Qualitative, grounded theory exploration of patients' experience of early mobilisation, rehabilitation and recovery after critical illness.定性、扎根理论探索重症患者在疾病早期的活动、康复和恢复的体验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 24;9(2):e026348. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026348.
9
The specific needs of patients following sepsis: a nested qualitative interview study.脓毒症后患者的特殊需求:一项嵌套式定性访谈研究
BJGP Open. 2017 Jan 9;1(1):bjgpopen17X100725. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen17X100725.
10
Should ICU clinicians follow patients after ICU discharge? Yes.重症监护病房(ICU)的临床医生在患者出院后应该对其进行随访吗?答案是肯定的。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Sep;44(9):1539-1541. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5260-3. Epub 2018 Jul 27.

全科医生在脓毒症患者护理方面的观点和经验:一项定性访谈研究。

General practitioners' views and experiences in caring for patients after sepsis: a qualitative interview study.

机构信息

Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Charite University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Munchen, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 10;11(2):e040533. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040533.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040533
PMID:33568366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7878160/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients surviving critical illnesses, such as sepsis, often suffer from long-term complications. After discharge from hospital, most patients are treated in primary care. Little is known how general practitioners (GPs) perform critical illness aftercare and how it can be improved. Within a randomised controlled trial, an outreach training programme has been developed and applied.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to describe GPs' views and experiences of caring for postsepsis patients and of participating a specific outreach training.

DESIGN

Semistructured qualitative interviews.

SETTING

14 primary care practices in the metropolitan area of Berlin, Germany.

PARTICIPANTS

14 GPs who had participated in a structured sepsis aftercare programme in primary care.

RESULTS

Themes identified in sepsis aftercare were: continuity of care and good relationship with patients, GP's experiences during their patient's critical illness and impact of persisting symptoms. An outreach education as part of the intervention was considered by the GPs to be acceptable, helpful to improve knowledge of the management of postintensive care complications and useful for sepsis aftercare in daily practice.

CONCLUSIONS

GPs provide continuity of care to patients surviving sepsis. Better communication at the intensive care unit-GP interface and training in management of long-term complications of sepsis may be helpful to improve sepsis aftercare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN61744782.

摘要

背景

患有脓毒症等危重病的患者通常会长期遭受并发症的困扰。出院后,大多数患者在基层医疗机构接受治疗。对于全科医生(GP)如何进行危重病康复护理以及如何改进这一情况,目前知之甚少。在一项随机对照试验中,开发并应用了一种延伸培训计划。

目的

本研究旨在描述 GP 照顾败血症患者的观点和经验,以及他们参与特定延伸培训的情况。

设计

半结构化定性访谈。

地点

德国柏林大都市区的 14 家基层医疗诊所。

参与者

14 名曾参与基层医疗结构化脓毒症康复护理计划的 GP。

结果

脓毒症康复护理中确定的主题包括:连续性护理和与患者的良好关系、GP 在患者危重病期间的经验以及持续症状的影响。延伸教育作为干预措施的一部分被 GP 认为是可以接受的,有助于提高对重症监护后并发症管理的认识,并有助于日常实践中的脓毒症康复护理。

结论

GP 为存活的脓毒症患者提供连续性护理。在重症监护病房和 GP 之间更好的沟通,以及对脓毒症长期并发症的管理培训,可能有助于改善脓毒症康复护理。

试验注册号

ISRCTN61744782。