Suppr超能文献

考虑行预防性输卵管切除术或输卵管卵巢切除术降低风险的绝经前携带者的手术决策:一项定性研究。

Surgical decision making in premenopausal carriers considering risk-reducing early salpingectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts CRUK Centre, Queen Mary University of London-Charterhouse Square Campus, London, UK.

Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

J Med Genet. 2022 Feb;59(2):122-132. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107501. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acceptance of the role of the fallopian tube in 'ovarian' carcinogenesis and the detrimental sequelae of surgical menopause in premenopausal women following risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) has resulted in risk-reducing early-salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy (RRESDO) being proposed as an attractive alternative risk-reducing strategy in women who decline/delay oophorectomy. We present the results of a qualitative study evaluating the decision-making process among carriers considering prophylactic surgeries (RRSO/RRESDO) as part of the multicentre PROTECTOR trial (ISRCTN:25173360).

METHODS

In-depth semistructured 1:1 interviews conducted using a predeveloped topic-guide (development informed by literature review and expert consultation) until informational saturation reached. Wording and sequencing of questions were left open with probes used to elicit additional information. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, transcripts analysed using an inductive theoretical framework and data managed using NVIVO-v12.

RESULTS

Informational saturation was reached following 24 interviews. Seven interconnected themes integral to surgical decision making were identified: fertility/menopause/cancer risk reduction/surgical choices/surgical complications/sequence of ovarian-and-breast prophylactic surgeries/support/satisfaction. Women for whom maximising ovarian cancer risk reduction was relatively more important than early menopause/quality-of-life preferred RRSO, whereas those more concerned about detrimental impact of menopause chose RRESDO. Women managed in specialist familial cancer clinic settings compared with non-specialist settings felt they received better quality care, improved hormone replacement therapy access and were more satisfied.

CONCLUSION

Multiple contextual factors (medical, physical, psychological, social) influence timing of risk-reducing surgeries. RRESDO offers women delaying/declining premenopausal oophorectomy, particularly those concerned about menopausal effects, a degree of ovarian cancer risk reduction while avoiding early menopause. Care of high-risk women should be centralised to centres with specialist familial gynaecological cancer risk management services to provide a better-quality, streamlined, holistic multidisciplinary approach.

摘要

背景

接受输卵管在“卵巢”发生癌中的作用,以及预防性输卵管卵巢切除术(RRSO)后绝经前妇女手术性绝经的不利后果,导致提出了一种有吸引力的替代风险降低策略,即降低风险的早期输卵管切除术加延迟卵巢切除术(RRESDO),适用于拒绝/延迟卵巢切除术的妇女。我们介绍了一项定性研究的结果,该研究评估了作为多中心 PROTECTOR 试验(ISRCTN:25173360)一部分考虑预防性手术(RRSO/RRESDO)的携带者的决策过程。

方法

使用预先开发的主题指南(通过文献综述和专家咨询来获取信息)进行深入的半结构化 1:1 访谈,直到达到信息饱和。问题的措辞和顺序保持开放,使用探针来引出更多信息。所有访谈均进行录音,逐字记录,使用归纳理论框架进行转录分析,并使用 NVIVO-v12 管理数据。

结果

在进行了 24 次访谈后达到了信息饱和。确定了与手术决策相关的七个相互关联的主题:生育/绝经/癌症风险降低/手术选择/手术并发症/卵巢和乳房预防性手术的顺序/支持/满意度。对于那些认为最大限度降低卵巢癌风险比早期绝经/生活质量更重要的女性,她们更喜欢 RRSO;而那些更担心绝经影响的女性则选择 RRESDO。与非专科设置相比,在专科家族性癌症诊所就诊的女性感到她们获得了更好的护理、改善了激素替代疗法的获取途径,并更加满意。

结论

多种环境因素(医学、身体、心理、社会)影响风险降低手术的时间。RRESDO 为那些推迟/拒绝绝经前卵巢切除术的女性,特别是那些担心绝经影响的女性,提供了一定程度的卵巢癌风险降低,同时避免了早期绝经。高危女性的护理应集中在具有专科家族性妇科癌症风险管理服务的中心,以提供高质量、简化、全面的多学科方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1fd/8788252/bbb967f11537/jmedgenet-2020-107501f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验