Seppälä Piia, Mäkikangas Anne, Hakanen Jari J, Tolvanen Asko, Feldt Taru
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Arinatie 3, FI-00370, Helsinki, Finland.
Tampere University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Psychology, Kalevantie 4, FI-33014, Tampere, Finland.
J Pers Oriented Res. 2020 Sep 10;6(1):16-27. doi: 10.17505/jpor.2020.22043. eCollection 2020.
Work engagement is expected to result from job resources such as autonomy. However, previous results have yielded that the autonomy-work engagement relationship is not always particularly strong. Whereas previous longitudinal studies have examined this relationship as an average at a specific point in time, this study examined whether this relationship is different within individuals from one time to another over the years. Furthermore, experiences of work engagement are expected to affect how employees benefit from autonomy, but no studies have so far investigated whether the initial level of work engagement affects the autonomy-work engagement relationship. This study aimed to first identify the different kinds of longitudinal relationship patterns between autonomy and work engagement, and then to investigate whether the identified relationship patterns differ in terms of the initial mean level of work engagement. The four-wave study was conducted among Finnish managers ( = 329) over a period of six years. Multilevel regression mixture analysis identified five relationship patterns. Four of the patterns showed a positive predictive relationship between autonomy and work engagement. However, the relationship was statistically significant in only one of these patterns. Furthermore, when the initial mean level of work engagement was high, autonomy related more strongly to work engagement. However, an atypical pattern was identified that showed a negative association between autonomy and work engagement. In this pattern, the mean level of work engagement was low. Consequently, autonomy may not always enhance work engagement; sometimes this relationship may even be negative.
工作投入被认为源于诸如自主性等工作资源。然而,先前的研究结果表明,自主性与工作投入之间的关系并不总是特别紧密。以往的纵向研究是在特定时间点将这种关系作为平均值来考察的,而本研究考察的是多年来个体内部这种关系在不同时间之间是否存在差异。此外,工作投入的体验预计会影响员工如何从自主性中受益,但迄今为止尚无研究调查工作投入的初始水平是否会影响自主性与工作投入之间的关系。本研究旨在首先确定自主性与工作投入之间不同类型的纵向关系模式,然后调查所确定的关系模式在工作投入的初始平均水平方面是否存在差异。这项四波研究在六年时间里对芬兰的329名经理进行。多层次回归混合分析确定了五种关系模式。其中四种模式显示自主性与工作投入之间存在正向预测关系。然而,只有其中一种模式的这种关系具有统计学意义。此外,当工作投入的初始平均水平较高时,自主性与工作投入的关联更强。然而,还发现了一种非典型模式,显示自主性与工作投入之间存在负相关。在这种模式中,工作投入的平均水平较低。因此,自主性不一定总能提高工作投入;有时这种关系甚至可能是负面的。