Chodavadia Parth A, Jacobs Corbin D, Wang Frances, Salama Joseph K, Kelsey Chris R, Clarke Jeffrey M, Ready Neal E, Torok Jordan A
School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Jan;10(1):261-273. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-537.
Combining radiotherapy (RT) and immunotherapy (IT) may enhance outcomes for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). However, data on the immunomodulatory effects of extracranial RT remains limited. This retrospective database analysis examined real-world practice patterns, predictors of survival, and comparative effectiveness of extracranial radioimmunotherapy (RT + IT) versus early-incorporation immunotherapy (eIT) in patients with mNSCLC.
Patients diagnosed with mNSCLC between 2004-2016 treated with eIT or RT + IT were identified in the National Cancer Database. Practice patterns were assessed using Cochrane-Armitrage trend test. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier method were used to analyze overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching was performed to account for baseline imbalances. Biologically effective doses (BED) were stratified based on the median (39 Gy). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was defined as above median BED in ≤5 fractions.
eIT utilization increased from 0.3% in 2010 to 13.2% in 2016 (P<0.0001). Rates of RT + eIT increased from 38.8% in 2010 to 49.1% in 2016 among those who received eIT (P<0.0001). Compared to eIT alone, RT + eIT demonstrated worse median OS (11.2 13.2 months) while SBRT + eIT demonstrated improved median OS (25 13.2 months) (P<0.0001). There were no significant differences in OS based on sequencing of eIT relative to RT (log-rank P=0.4415) or irradiated site (log-rank P=0.1606). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with improved OS included chemotherapy (HR 0.86, P=0.0058), treatment at academic facilities (HR 0.83, P<0.0001), and SBRT (HR 0.60, P=0.0009); after propensity-score multivariate analysis, SBRT alone showed improved OS (HR 0.28, P<0.0001).
Utilization of RT + eIT in mNSCLC is increasing. SBRT + eIT was associated with improved OS on propensity-score matched analysis. There were no significant differences in OS based on RT + eIT sequencing or site irradiated. Whether these observations reflect patient selection or possible immunomodulatory benefits of RT is unclear and warrants further study.
放疗(RT)与免疫疗法(IT)联合应用可能改善转移性非小细胞肺癌(mNSCLC)的治疗效果。然而,关于颅外放疗免疫调节作用的数据仍然有限。这项回顾性数据库分析研究了mNSCLC患者的实际临床实践模式、生存预测因素以及颅外放射免疫疗法(RT + IT)与早期联合免疫疗法(eIT)的疗效对比。
在国家癌症数据库中识别出2004年至2016年间诊断为mNSCLC并接受eIT或RT + IT治疗的患者。使用Cochrane-Armitrage趋势检验评估临床实践模式。采用Cox比例风险模型和Kaplan-Meier方法分析总生存期(OS)。进行倾向评分匹配以消除基线不平衡的影响。根据中位数(39 Gy)对生物等效剂量(BED)进行分层。立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)定义为BED高于中位数且分割次数≤5次。
eIT的使用比例从2010年的0.3%增至2016年的13.2%(P<0.0001)。在接受eIT的患者中,RT + eIT的使用比例从2010年的38.8%增至2016年的49.1%(P<0.0001)。与单纯eIT相比,RT + eIT的中位OS较差(11.2对13.2个月),而SBRT + eIT的中位OS有所改善(25对13.2个月)(P<0.0001)。基于eIT相对于RT的顺序或照射部位,OS无显著差异(对数秩检验P = 0.4415和P = 0.1606)。多因素分析显示,与OS改善相关的因素包括化疗(HR 0.86,P = 0.0058)、在学术机构接受治疗(HR 0.83,P<0.0001)和SBRT(HR 0.60,P = 0.0009);倾向评分多因素分析后,单纯SBRT显示OS改善(HR 0.28,P<0.0001)。
mNSCLC患者中RT + eIT的使用正在增加。倾向评分匹配分析显示SBRT + eIT与OS改善相关。基于RT + eIT顺序或照射部位,OS无显著差异。这些观察结果是反映患者选择还是RT可能的免疫调节益处尚不清楚,值得进一步研究。