• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Machine learning-based outcome prediction and novel hypotheses generation for substance use disorder treatment.基于机器学习的物质使用障碍治疗结局预测和新假说生成。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jun 12;28(6):1216-1224. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa350.
2
Stroke prognostication for discharge planning with machine learning: A derivation study.基于机器学习的出院计划中风预后预测:一项推导研究。
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Sep;79:100-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.07.046. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
3
Use of a machine learning framework to predict substance use disorder treatment success.使用机器学习框架预测物质使用障碍治疗的成功率。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 10;12(4):e0175383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175383. eCollection 2017.
4
Mortality risk prediction in burn injury: Comparison of logistic regression with machine learning approaches.烧伤死亡率风险预测:逻辑回归与机器学习方法的比较
Burns. 2015 Aug;41(5):925-34. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2015.03.016. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
5
Applying Deep Neural Networks and Ensemble Machine Learning Methods to Forecast Airborne Pollen.应用深度神经网络和集成机器学习方法预测气传花粉。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 4;16(11):1992. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111992.
6
Effects of dataset size and interactions on the prediction performance of logistic regression and deep learning models.数据集大小和交互作用对逻辑回归和深度学习模型预测性能的影响。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Jan;213:106504. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106504. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
7
Predictive Abilities of Machine Learning Techniques May Be Limited by Dataset Characteristics: Insights From the UNOS Database.机器学习技术的预测能力可能受到数据集特征的限制:来自 UNOS 数据库的见解。
J Card Fail. 2019 Jun;25(6):479-483. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.01.018. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
8
Using machine learning to predict opioid misuse among U.S. adolescents.利用机器学习预测美国青少年阿片类药物滥用。
Prev Med. 2020 Jan;130:105886. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105886. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
9
A data-driven approach to predicting diabetes and cardiovascular disease with machine learning.基于机器学习的数据驱动方法预测糖尿病和心血管疾病。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Nov 6;19(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0918-5.
10
Predicting Substance Use Treatment Failure with Transfer Learning.基于迁移学习的物质使用治疗失败预测。
Subst Use Misuse. 2022;57(13):1982-1987. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2125272. Epub 2022 Sep 21.

引用本文的文献

1
A machine learning approach for diagnostic and prognostic predictions, key risk factors and interactions.一种用于诊断和预后预测、关键风险因素及相互作用的机器学习方法。
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2025 Mar;25(1):1-28. doi: 10.1007/s10742-024-00324-7. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
2
Determinants of outpatient substance use disorder treatment length-of-stay and completion: the case of a treatment program in the southeast U.S.门诊物质使用障碍治疗时间和完成情况的决定因素:美国东南部某治疗项目的案例
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 26;13(1):13961. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41350-8.
3
Use of machine learning to examine disparities in completion of substance use disorder treatment.使用机器学习检查物质使用障碍治疗完成情况的差异。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 23;17(9):e0275054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275054. eCollection 2022.
4
Impact of Cluster B Personality Disorders in Drugs Therapeutic Community Treatment Outcomes: A Study Based on Real World Data.B 类人格障碍对药物治疗社区治疗结果的影响:一项基于真实世界数据的研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 10;10(12):2572. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122572.

本文引用的文献

1
On classifying sepsis heterogeneity in the ICU: insight using machine learning.在 ICU 中对脓毒症异质性进行分类:使用机器学习的见解。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Mar 1;27(3):437-443. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz211.
2
Analysis of substance use and its outcomes by machine learning I. Childhood evaluation of liability to substance use disorder.基于机器学习的物质使用分析及其结果 I. 儿童期物质使用障碍易感性评估。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Jan 1;206:107605. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107605. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
3
Online Searching and Social Media to Detect Alcohol Use Risk at Population Scale.在线搜索和社交媒体在人群中检测饮酒风险。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jan;58(1):79-88. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.08.027. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
4
Probing for Sparse and Fast Variable Selection with Model-Based Boosting.基于模型的提升法探索稀疏快速变量选择
Comput Math Methods Med. 2017;2017:1421409. doi: 10.1155/2017/1421409. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
5
Residential and outpatient treatment completion for substance use disorders in the U.S.: Moderation analysis by demographics and drug of choice.美国物质使用障碍的住院和门诊治疗完成情况:按人口统计学特征和首选药物进行的调节分析。
Addict Behav. 2016 Jul;58:129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.02.030. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
6
Drop-out from addiction treatment: a systematic review of risk factors.戒毒治疗中的脱落:风险因素的系统评价。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2013 Dec;33(8):1010-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
7
What could the program have done differently? A qualitative examination of reasons for leaving outpatient treatment.该项目本可以采取哪些不同的做法?对离开门诊治疗原因的定性研究。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009 Sep;37(2):182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.01.001. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
8
Does retention matter? Treatment duration and improvement in drug use.留存率重要吗?治疗时长与药物使用改善情况。
Addiction. 2003 May;98(5):673-84. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00354.x.
9
A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model.逻辑回归模型拟合优度检验的比较
Stat Med. 1997 May 15;16(9):965-80. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970515)16:9<965::aid-sim509>3.0.co;2-o.

基于机器学习的物质使用障碍治疗结局预测和新假说生成。

Machine learning-based outcome prediction and novel hypotheses generation for substance use disorder treatment.

机构信息

Department of Operations and Information Systems, Manning School of Business, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.

Susan and Alan Solomont School of Nursing, Zuckerberg College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jun 12;28(6):1216-1224. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa350.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocaa350
PMID:33570148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8661425/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Substance use disorder is a critical public health issue. Discovering the synergies among factors impacting treatment program success can help governments and treatment facilities develop effective policies. In this work, we propose a novel data analytics approach using machine learning models to discover interaction effects that might be neglected by traditional hypothesis-generating approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A patient-episode-level substance use treatment discharge dataset and a Federal Bureau of Investigation crime dataset were joined using core-based statistical area codes. Random forests, artificial neural networks, and extreme gradient boosting were applied with a nested cross-validation methodology. Interaction effects were identified based on the machine learning model with the best performance. These interaction effects were analyzed and tested using traditional logistic regression models on unseen data.

RESULTS

In predicting patient completion of a treatment program, extreme gradient boosting performed the best with an area under the curve of 89.31%. Based on our procedure, 73 interaction effects were identified. Among these, 14 were tested using traditional logistic regression models where 12 were statistically significant (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified new interaction effects among the length of stay, frequency of substance use, changes in self-help group attendance frequency, and other factors. This work provides insights into the interactions between factors impacting treatment completion. Further traditional statistical analysis can be employed by practitioners and policy makers to test the effects discovered by our novel machine learning approach.

摘要

目的

药物滥用障碍是一个严重的公共卫生问题。发现影响治疗计划成功的因素之间的协同作用可以帮助政府和治疗机构制定有效的政策。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种使用机器学习模型的新数据分析方法,以发现传统的假设生成方法可能忽略的交互作用。

材料与方法

使用基于核心的统计区域代码将患者-发作水平的药物使用治疗出院数据集和联邦调查局犯罪数据集合并。随机森林、人工神经网络和极端梯度增强在嵌套交叉验证方法中应用。基于性能最佳的机器学习模型确定交互作用。在未见数据上使用传统逻辑回归模型对这些交互作用进行分析和测试。

结果

在预测患者完成治疗计划方面,极端梯度增强的表现最佳,曲线下面积为 89.31%。根据我们的程序,确定了 73 个交互作用。其中,12 个具有统计学意义(P<.05)的交互作用使用传统逻辑回归模型进行了测试。

结论

我们发现了新的交互作用,包括住院时间、药物使用频率、自助小组参加频率的变化以及其他因素之间的交互作用。这项工作提供了对影响治疗完成的因素之间相互作用的深入了解。从业者和政策制定者可以进一步采用传统的统计分析来测试我们新的机器学习方法发现的效果。