Gozdzik Anna, Marwick Thomas H, Przewlocka-Kosmala Monika, Jankowska Ewa A, Ponikowski Piotr, Kosmala Wojciech
Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, Wroclaw, 50-556, Poland.
Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;8(2):1531-1540. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13247. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
Several different diagnostic parameters can be used to assess left ventricular (LV) longitudinal systolic function, but no studies comparing their predictive value have been conducted. We sought to compare the prognostic value of LV long-axis function parameters at rest and exercise using the population with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
Clinical and biochemical variables were collected at baseline in 201 patients with HFpEF. Echocardiography was performed at rest and immediately after exercise, with measurement of mitral annular plane systolic excursion, systolic tissue velocity (s'), global longitudinal strain (GLS), and global longitudinal strain rate (GLSR). Participants were followed for 48 (24-60) months for heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death. Seventy-four patients (36.8%) met the study endpoint. Cox regression analysis revealed that after adjustment for Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure risk score, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and peak VO , heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death were significantly associated with GLS at rest [hazard ratio (HR) 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.98; P = 0.016], GLS after exercise (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.77-0.91; P < 0.001), and GLSR after exercise (HR 0.13; 95% CI 0.04-0.48; P = 0.002). The addition of each of the following: exercise GLS and GLSR and resting GLS to the base model including Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure, BNP, and peak VO improved predictive power for the study endpoint [net reclassification improvement (NRI) = 49%, P < 0.001; NRI = 42%, P = 0.004; and NRI = 38%, P = 0.009, respectively]. Exercise GLS was the only longitudinal parameter significantly improving c-statistics of the base model (0.68 vs. 0.73; P = 0.047).
Echocardiographic parameters of LV longitudinal function are not equipotential in predicting adverse outcomes in HFpEF. LV deformation indices, especially assessed with exercise, show the highest predictive utility independent from and incremental to clinical data and BNP.
有几种不同的诊断参数可用于评估左心室(LV)纵向收缩功能,但尚未有研究比较它们的预测价值。我们试图在射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)人群中比较静息和运动时LV长轴功能参数的预后价值。
收集了201例HFpEF患者的基线临床和生化变量。在静息时和运动后立即进行超声心动图检查,测量二尖瓣环平面收缩期位移、收缩期组织速度(s')、整体纵向应变(GLS)和整体纵向应变率(GLSR)。对参与者进行了48(24 - 60)个月的随访,观察心力衰竭住院和心血管死亡情况。74例患者(36.8%)达到研究终点。Cox回归分析显示,在调整慢性心力衰竭Meta分析全球组风险评分、脑钠肽(BNP)和峰值摄氧量后,心力衰竭住院和心血管死亡与静息时的GLS显著相关[风险比(HR)0.91;95%置信区间(CI)0.84 - 0.98;P = 0.016]、运动后的GLS(HR 0.84;95% CI 0.77 - 0.91;P < 0.001)以及运动后的GLSR(HR 0.13;95% CI 0.04 - 0.48;P = 0.002)。将以下各项:运动GLS和GLSR以及静息GLS添加到包括慢性心力衰竭Meta分析全球组、BNP和峰值摄氧量的基础模型中,可提高对研究终点的预测能力[净重新分类改善(NRI)= 49%,P < 0.001;NRI = 42%,P = 0.004;以及NRI = 38%,P = 0.009,分别]。运动GLS是唯一显著改善基础模型c统计量的纵向参数(0.68对0.73;P = 0.047)。
LV纵向功能的超声心动图参数在预测HFpEF的不良结局方面并非等势。LV变形指标,尤其是运动时评估的指标,显示出最高的预测效用,独立于临床数据和BNP且对其有增量作用。