Backman Chantal, Chartrand Julie, Crick Michelle, Devey Burry Robin, Dingwall Orvie, Shea Beverley
School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Nurs Open. 2021 Mar;8(2):721-754. doi: 10.1002/nop2.677. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
The aim was to critically analyse the body of evidence regarding the effectiveness of PFCC transition interventions on the quality of care and the experience of patients.
We conducted a systematic review using the Cochrane Handbook's guidelines and adhered to a standardized reporting format: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
Four databases and grey literature were searched. Following a two-step screening process, data from the eligible studies were extracted. Risk of bias and quality of the studies were also assessed. Narrative synthesis and vote counting were used for the data analysis.
A total of 28 articles met our inclusion criteria. Interventions varied in regards to the extent of the PFCC focus and the comprehensiveness of the transition of care. Educating patients to promote self-management was the most commonly included component and it was described in all 28 interventions.
本研究旨在严格分析关于患者与家庭参与式护理(PFCC)过渡干预措施对护理质量及患者体验有效性的证据。
我们按照Cochrane手册的指南进行了一项系统评价,并遵循标准化报告格式:系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)。
检索了四个数据库及灰色文献。经过两步筛选过程,提取了符合条件的研究数据。还评估了研究的偏倚风险和质量。数据分析采用叙述性综合分析和投票计数法。
共有28篇文章符合我们的纳入标准。干预措施在PFCC关注程度和护理过渡的全面性方面存在差异。教育患者促进自我管理是最常包含的组成部分,所有28项干预措施中均有描述。