Suppr超能文献

复杂分离株中克拉霉素和阿奇霉素耐药相关的药物敏感性模式和基因序列比较,以及固有大环内酯类耐药的累积评估。

Comparison of drug-susceptibility patterns and gene sequences associated with clarithromycin and azithromycin resistance in complex isolates and evaluation of the accumulation of intrinsic macrolide resistance.

机构信息

Clinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Kinki-chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai-shi, Osaka, Japan.

Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kinki-chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai-shi, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

J Med Microbiol. 2021 Mar;70(3). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001326. Epub 2021 Feb 11.

Abstract

complex (MABC) is an infectious agent associated with macrolide resistance and treatment failure. Despite drug-susceptibility testing for MABC isolates including clarithromycin (CAM), long-term treatment with azithromycin (AZM) for MABC disease is recommended. We compared phenotypic and genotypic resistance to AZM and CAM in clinical isolates and evaluated the accumulation of intrinsic macrolide resistance (AIM) and morphological changes by macrolides exposure. Forty-nine isolates were characterized regarding (41) sequevars. Sequencing data were compared to the nucleotide sequence of and . The AIM MIC was performed in three reference strains and 15 isolates were randomized [each set of five isolates with subsp. (MAA) T28, MAA C28 and subsp. (MAM)]. The 49 isolates were distributed as 24 MAA T28, 5 MAA C28 and 20 MAM. The MIC values to CAM at day 3 in MAA T28, C28 and MAM were 1, 0.12 and 0.12 µg ml, while those at day 14 were 32, 0.5 and 0.12 µg ml, respectively. The AZM-MIC values at day 3 of the above isolates were 4, 0.25 and 0.5 µg ml, while those at day 14 were >64, 0.5 and 0.5 µg ml, respectively. Neither mutations in of MAA T28 with acquired resistance nor deletions in of MAA T28 without inducible resistance were observed . For AIM MIC, MAA T28 showed that the time-to-detection of AZM resistance was significantly faster over that of CAM (<0.05). Morphological changes were not determined in all isolates. Our findings did not support the suggestion for the preferential use of AZM for, at least, MAA T28 disease due to the high-level MIC value and the increased AIM. The long duration of AZM-based treatment eventually may favour the emergence of isolates with a high-level of intrinsic resistance.

摘要

49 株临床分离株的表型和基因型对阿奇霉素(AZM)和克拉霉素(CAM)的耐药性进行了比较,并评估了大环内酯类药物暴露后固有耐药性(AIM)的积累和形态变化。这 49 株分离株的(41)序列被特征化。测序数据与 和 的核苷酸序列进行了比较。在三个参考菌株中进行了 AIM MIC,15 株分离株被随机分组[每组 5 株分离株,包括 subsp. (MAA)T28、MAA C28 和 subsp. (MAM)]。49 株分离株分布为 24 株 MAA T28、5 株 MAA C28 和 20 株 MAM。MAA T28、C28 和 MAM 株在第 3 天对 CAM 的 MIC 值分别为 1、0.12 和 0.12µg/ml,而在第 14 天则分别为 32、0.5 和 0.12µg/ml。上述分离株第 3 天的 AZM-MIC 值分别为 4、0.25 和 0.5µg/ml,而第 14 天的 AZM-MIC 值分别为>64、0.5 和 0.5µg/ml。未观察到 MAA T28 中获得性耐药的突变和 MAA T28 中无诱导性耐药的缺失。对于 AIM MIC,MAA T28 显示 AZM 耐药的检测时间明显快于 CAM(<0.05)。并非所有分离株都确定了形态变化。我们的研究结果不支持至少对 MAA T28 疾病优先使用 AZM 的建议,因为 AZM 的 MIC 值较高,且固有耐药性增加。AZM 为基础的治疗时间延长最终可能有利于出现高水平固有耐药性的分离株。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验