Hsieh Katherine L, Wood Tyler A, An Ruopeng, Trinh Linda, Sosnoff Jacob J
Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2019 Feb 20;1(1-2):100001. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2018.12.001. eCollection 2019 Jun.
To systematically review and quantitatively synthesize gait and balance impairments in breast cancer survivors compared with age-matched controls or normative values for adults who never had breast cancer.
PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health, and Web of Science was searched using terms associated with , , and until November 2018.
Studies were included if they were randomized control trials, cross-sectional, prospective, pre-post, or case-control by design, included adult breast cancer survivors, reported gait and/or balance metrics as primary or secondary outcomes, were peer-reviewed publications, and were written in English. The search yielded 2117 results with 29 studies meeting the inclusion criteria.
Two reviewers assessed study quality by the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies to determine the strength of evidence for each study that met the inclusion criteria. Basic descriptors of each study, study protocol, and balance and gait measures were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed for the single leg stance, functional reach, center of pressure velocity, gait speed, and timed up and go.
For quality assessment, 3 studies were rated good, 16 fair, and 10 poor. The meta-analysis indicated that there were no significant differences in single leg stance between breast cancer survivors and those who never had breast cancer (=.33). Pooled values of the functional reach task (22.16cm; 95% CI, 8.98-35.33) and center of pressure velocity (1.2cm/s; 95% CI, 0.87-1.55) suggest balance impairment in breast cancer survivors when compared with normative values. Breast cancer survivors also performed worse than those who never had breast cancer in challenging balance conditions that reduced sensory information or altered base of support. Pooled gait speed at a usual speed (0.91m/s; 95% CI, 0.2-1.6), fast speed across a short distance (1.2m/s; 95% CI, 0.31-2.1), and fast gait speed across a long distance (1.65m/s; 95% CI, 1.64-1.66) suggest gait impairments when compared with normative values.
Breast cancer survivors may demonstrate gait and balance impairments compared with normative values. Clinicians should consider assessing changes in balance and gait in breast cancer survivors to improve functional independence and prevent fall-related injuries.
系统回顾并定量综合分析乳腺癌幸存者与年龄匹配的对照组或从未患乳腺癌的成年人的正常参考值相比,在步态和平衡方面的损伤情况。
使用与乳腺癌、步态、平衡相关的检索词,对PubMed、护理及相关健康累积索引数据库和科学网进行检索,检索截至2018年11月。
纳入的研究需为随机对照试验、横断面研究、前瞻性研究、前后对照研究或病例对照研究;纳入成年乳腺癌幸存者;将步态和/或平衡指标作为主要或次要结局进行报告;为同行评审出版物;且以英文撰写。检索共得到2117条结果,其中29项研究符合纳入标准。
两名评审员使用美国国立卫生研究院观察性队列和横断面研究质量评估工具评估研究质量,以确定每项符合纳入标准的研究的证据强度。提取每项研究的基本描述、研究方案以及平衡和步态测量数据。对单腿站立、功能性伸展、压力中心速度、步速以及计时起立行走测试进行荟萃分析。
在质量评估方面,3项研究评为良好,16项评为中等,10项评为较差。荟萃分析表明,乳腺癌幸存者与从未患乳腺癌者在单腿站立方面无显著差异(P = 0.33)。功能性伸展任务的合并值(22.16厘米;95%置信区间,8.98至35.33)和压力中心速度的合并值(1.2厘米/秒;95%置信区间,0.87至1.55)表明,与正常参考值相比,乳腺癌幸存者存在平衡损伤。在减少感觉信息或改变支撑面的挑战性平衡条件下,乳腺癌幸存者的表现也比从未患乳腺癌者差。以正常速度行走时的合并步速(0.91米/秒;95%置信区间,0.2至1.6)、短距离快速行走时的步速(1.2米/秒;95%置信区间,0.31至2.1)以及长距离快速行走时的步速(1.65米/秒;95%置信区间,1.64至1.66)表明,与正常参考值相比,存在步态损伤。
与正常参考值相比,乳腺癌幸存者可能存在步态和平衡损伤。临床医生应考虑评估乳腺癌幸存者的平衡和步态变化,以提高功能独立性并预防跌倒相关损伤。