Suppr超能文献

四项目心理化指数的编制与验证。

Development and validation of the Four-Item Mentalising Index.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Bath.

School of Psychology, Cardiff University.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2021 Jul;33(7):629-636. doi: 10.1037/pas0001004. Epub 2021 Feb 11.

Abstract

Mentalising, also known as "Theory of Mind", is the ability to understand and infer the cognitions of others, such as their perceptions, intentions, and beliefs. Although several tools have been designed to measure mentalising in adults, there exist methodological and practical limitations. Many of the existing measures conflate mentalising with similar constructs (e.g., empathy), and most are lengthy measures that are unsuitable for large population-based studies and clinical practice. These issues are currently hampering clinical and non-clinical investigations into mentalising and related social-cognitive abilities. Drawing on questionnaire measures of social cognition, we conceived a self-report mentalising scale, the Four-Item Mentalising Index (FIMI; Studies 1a and b). The FIMI was developed through a series of studies examining its factor structure and reliability (Studies 2a and b) and by testing its construct validity against a cognitive mentalising task, autistic traits, and comparing scores in autistic and non-autistic people (Studies 3a and b). Together, we demonstrate that the FIMI is a conceptually and methodologically robust tool for measuring mentalising ability in the general population, including autistic and non-autistic people. Future research directions and practical (clinical) applications of the scale are discussed, with a focus on improving understanding and management of (a)typical mentalising ability. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

心理化,也被称为“心智理论”,是理解和推断他人认知的能力,例如他们的感知、意图和信念。虽然已经设计了几种工具来衡量成年人的心理化能力,但存在方法学和实际的局限性。许多现有的衡量标准将心理化与类似的结构混淆在一起(例如,同理心),而且大多数都是冗长的衡量标准,不适合大规模的基于人群的研究和临床实践。这些问题目前正在阻碍对心理化和相关社会认知能力的临床和非临床研究。我们借鉴了社会认知问卷测量,构思了一个自我报告的心理化量表,即四项目心理化指数(FIMI;研究 1a 和 b)。FIMI 通过一系列研究来检验其因素结构和可靠性(研究 2a 和 b),并通过与认知心理化任务、自闭症特征进行比较,以及比较自闭症和非自闭症人群的得分(研究 3a 和 b)来检验其建构效度。总之,我们证明了 FIMI 是一种在普通人群中测量心理化能力的概念和方法上都非常可靠的工具,包括自闭症和非自闭症人群。本文讨论了该量表的未来研究方向和实际(临床)应用,重点是提高对(非典型)心理化能力的理解和管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验