Basile Chiara, Lecce Serena, van Vugt Floris Tijmen
Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 11;13:886639. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886639. eCollection 2022.
Moving together in time affects human social affiliation and cognition. However, it is unclear whether these effects hold for on-line video meetings and whether they extend to empathy (understanding or sharing others' emotions) and theory of mind (ToM; attribution of mental states to others). 126 young adult participants met through online video in unacquainted pairs. Participants either performed 3 min of synchronous arm movements paced by sounds ( = 40), asynchronous movements ( = 46) or a small talk condition ( = 40). In a subsequent empathy task, participants engaged in a conversation. A video recording of this conversation was played back, and each participant rated, at predetermined time points, how they felt and how they thought their partner felt. From this we calculated empathic accuracy (accuracy of the estimation of the other's emotions) and emotional congruence (emotion sharing). ToM was measured by showing videos of geometrical shapes interacting and asking the participants to describe what happened, measuring the amount of intentionality. We found that participants in the synchrony condition rated feeling greater closeness and similarity to their partners relative to the asynchronous condition. Further, participants in the synchrony group tended to ascribe more intentionality to the abstract shapes than participants in asynchrony condition, suggesting greater ToM. Synchrony and asynchrony groups did not reliably differ in empathic accuracy nor emotional congruence. These results suggest that moving in synchrony has effects on social affiliation measures even in online encounters. These effects extend to ToM tendencies but not empathic accuracy or emotion sharing. These results highlight the potential of synchronous movement in online encounters to affect a subset of social cognition and affiliation measures.
同步行动会影响人类的社会归属感和认知。然而,目前尚不清楚这些影响是否适用于在线视频会议,以及它们是否延伸到同理心(理解或分享他人的情感)和心理理论(心理理论;将心理状态归因于他人)。126名年轻成年参与者通过在线视频以不相识的两人一组的形式见面。参与者要么进行3分钟由声音节奏控制的同步手臂运动(=40)、异步运动(=46),要么处于闲聊状态(=40)。在随后的同理心任务中,参与者进行对话。这段对话的视频记录被回放,每个参与者在预定的时间点对自己的感受以及他们认为对方的感受进行评分。由此我们计算出同理心准确性(对他人情绪估计的准确性)和情绪一致性(情绪分享)。心理理论是通过展示几何形状相互作用的视频并要求参与者描述发生了什么来测量的,测量意向性的程度。我们发现,与异步条件相比,同步条件下的参与者对其伙伴的亲近感和相似度评价更高。此外,同步组的参与者比异步条件下的参与者倾向于将更多的意向性归因于抽象形状,这表明心理理论更强。同步组和异步组在同理心准确性和情绪一致性方面没有可靠的差异。这些结果表明,即使在在线交流中,同步行动也会对社会归属感测量产生影响。这些影响延伸到心理理论倾向,但不涉及同理心准确性或情绪分享。这些结果凸显了在线交流中同步运动在影响社会认知和归属感测量的一个子集中的潜力。