Interdisciplinary Center for Palliative Medicine, CCC Mainfranken, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Department of Palliative Medicine, CCC Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Oct;17(10):e1584-e1591. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00698. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
Guidelines recommend several screening tools to identify patients with complex palliative needs. This diversity and lack of structural recommendations offer a wide scope for implementing screening. Against this background, the current status of implementation at German Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCCs) funded by the German Cancer Aid has not yet been investigated.
e-mail survey of the 17 hospital sites of the 13 CCCs. The questionnaire asked for structural characteristics of the centers as well as preconditions of the screening process. Structurally established screening procedures (one item) and standardized workflows, modes of performance, screening tools (four items), modes of training how to screen, and responsibilities (two items) were assessed.
In a 2-month period, 15 hospital sites responded; seven hospital sites conducted a palliative care needs (PCN) screening. Only one hospital site carried out PCN screening in almost all oncology departments, but only with the distress thermometer. Other hospital sites determined palliative needs by assessing physical symptoms using the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale or the Minimal Documentation System, and two hospital sites combined tools to determine both physical and psychological stress. The type of screening varied from paper-pencil-based to tablet computer-based documentation. The main barriers to implementation were identified as a lack of human resources and a lack of structural conditions.
There is a lack of consensus among palliative care specialists and oncologists in the CCCs supported by the German Cancer Aid in PCN screening as well as of structured guidelines and the professional association. Structural requirements should be adapted to these needs, which include both technical and human resources. A combined psycho-oncologic and palliative care screening might help to formulate best practice recommendations.
指南推荐了几种筛查工具,以识别具有复杂姑息治疗需求的患者。这种多样性和缺乏结构性建议为实施筛查提供了广泛的空间。在此背景下,德国癌症援助资助的 13 家综合癌症中心(CCC)的当前实施情况尚未得到调查。
对 13 家 CCC 的 17 家医院进行电子邮件调查。问卷询问了中心的结构特征以及筛查过程的前提条件。评估了结构上确定的筛查程序(一个项目)和标准化工作流程、执行模式、筛查工具(四个项目)、筛查培训模式以及责任(两个项目)。
在两个月的时间里,有 15 家医院做出了回应;7 家医院进行了姑息治疗需求(PCN)筛查。只有一家医院几乎在所有肿瘤科室都进行了 PCN 筛查,但仅使用了痛苦温度计。其他医院通过使用综合姑息治疗结局量表或最小化文档系统评估身体症状来确定姑息需求,还有两家医院结合使用工具来确定身体和心理压力。筛查的类型从纸笔记录到平板电脑记录不等。实施的主要障碍被确定为人力资源短缺和缺乏结构性条件。
德国癌症援助资助的 CCC 中的姑息治疗专家和肿瘤学家在 PCN 筛查以及结构化指南和专业协会方面缺乏共识,也缺乏一致的筛查方法。结构要求应适应这些需求,包括技术和人力资源。结合心理肿瘤学和姑息治疗筛查可能有助于制定最佳实践建议。