• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨科手术切口的关闭时间:新型皮肤缝合装置与传统缝线的比较。

Time to closure of orthopaedic surgical incisions: a novel skin closure device versus conventional sutures.

机构信息

Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, US.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shamir Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Wound Care. 2021 Feb 2;30(2):130-133. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.2.130.

DOI:10.12968/jowc.2021.30.2.130
PMID:33573485
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

New technologies are being developed to optimise healing of surgical incisions. BandGrip (US) is a micro-anchor skin closure device that replaces the need for subcuticular suturing and further dressing. The purpose of this study is to perform a matched cohort analysis comparing time to closure of surgical incisions between sutures and the novel skin closure device.

METHOD

Patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery in 2019 underwent skin closure with either conventional sutures or the novel skin closure device. Patients were divided into three groups according to their procedural incisions: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); simple arthroscopy; and general incisions. Patients who underwent closure of their surgical incision with the novel skin closure device were matched with patients undergoing superficial closure with sutures. Statistical analysis was performed to compare time to closure per centimetre of skin incision between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients were included in the study. Overall mean time to closure using the novel skin closure device was less than with sutures (8.6 seconds/cm versus 42.8 seconds/cm, respectively, p<0.001). Mean time to closure for ACLR incisions was 3.7 seconds/cm using the novel skin closure device and 35.5 seconds/cm using sutures (p<0.001). Mean time to closure for simple arthroscopy portals was 19 seconds/cm using the novel skin closure device and 47.6 seconds/cm using sutures (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

BandGrip is a novel skin closure device that allows for efficient surgical incision closure. Time to surgical skin incision closure is significantly less with the use of the novel skin closure device when compared with conventional sutures.

摘要

目的

正在开发新技术以优化手术切口的愈合。BandGrip(美国)是一种微型锚定皮肤闭合装置,可替代皮下缝合和进一步的敷料。本研究的目的是进行匹配队列分析,比较缝线和新型皮肤闭合装置闭合手术切口的时间。

方法

2019 年接受骨科手术的患者接受传统缝线或新型皮肤闭合装置进行皮肤闭合。根据手术切口的类型将患者分为三组:前交叉韧带重建(ACLR);单纯关节镜检查;和一般切口。使用新型皮肤闭合装置闭合手术切口的患者与使用缝线进行浅表闭合的患者相匹配。进行统计学分析以比较每组每厘米皮肤切口闭合的时间。

结果

共有 86 名患者纳入研究。使用新型皮肤闭合装置的总闭合时间明显短于缝线(分别为 8.6 秒/cm 和 42.8 秒/cm,p<0.001)。使用新型皮肤闭合装置闭合 ACLR 切口的平均时间为 3.7 秒/cm,使用缝线的平均时间为 35.5 秒/cm(p<0.001)。使用新型皮肤闭合装置闭合单纯关节镜入路的平均时间为 19 秒/cm,使用缝线的平均时间为 47.6 秒/cm(p<0.001)。

结论

BandGrip 是一种新型的皮肤闭合装置,可实现高效的手术切口闭合。与传统缝线相比,新型皮肤闭合装置可显著缩短手术皮肤切口闭合的时间。

相似文献

1
Time to closure of orthopaedic surgical incisions: a novel skin closure device versus conventional sutures.骨科手术切口的关闭时间:新型皮肤缝合装置与传统缝线的比较。
J Wound Care. 2021 Feb 2;30(2):130-133. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.2.130.
2
Comparing cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and conventional subcuticular skin sutures for maxillofacial incisions--a prospective randomized trial considering closure time, wound morbidity, and cosmetic outcome.比较氰基丙烯酸酯组织粘合剂与传统皮下皮肤缝线用于颌面切口——一项考虑闭合时间、伤口发病率和美容效果的前瞻性随机试验。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;71(12):2152.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.029.
3
Close orthopedic surgery skin incision with combination of barbed sutures and running subcuticular suturing technique for less dermal tension concentration: a finite element analysis.骨科手术皮肤切口的改良缝合技术:皮内缝合联合带刺缝线减少皮肤张力集中的有限元分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 May 5;18(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03755-z.
4
A randomised clinical trial to compare octyl cyanoacrylate with absorbable monofilament sutures for the closure of laparoscopic cholecystectomy port incisions.一项比较辛基氰基丙烯酸酯和可吸收单丝缝线用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术切口闭合的随机临床试验。
Int Wound J. 2020 Apr;17(2):449-454. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13294. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
5
Sutures versus staples for skin closure in orthopaedic surgery: meta-analysis.骨科手术中皮肤缝合的缝线与订书钉比较:荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2010 Mar 16;340:c1199. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1199.
6
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of Stratafix versus Standard-of-Care for Deep Tissue Closure in Orthopedic Surgery.分层固定系统与骨科手术标准治疗深度组织闭合的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2024 Oct;16(5):820-826. doi: 10.4055/cios22017. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
7
Prospective randomized trial of skin adhesive versus sutures for closure of 217 laparoscopic port-site incisions.皮肤粘合剂与缝线用于闭合217个腹腔镜手术切口的前瞻性随机试验。
J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Jun;196(6):845-53. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(03)00119-4.
8
A comparison of a new skin closure device and intradermal sutures in the closure of full-thickness surgical incisions.一种新型皮肤缝合器与皮内缝合线在全层切口缝合中的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Oct;130(4):843-850. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318262f237.
9
A prospective randomised comparison of 2 skin closure techniques in primary total hip arthroplasty surgery.初次全髋关节置换手术中两种皮肤缝合技术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Hip Int. 2018 Jan;28(1):101-105. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000534.
10
Randomized Controlled Trial of Topical Skin Adhesive vs Nylon Sutures for Incision Closure in Forefoot Surgery.随机对照试验:局部皮肤粘合剂与尼龙缝线在足前部手术切口闭合中的比较。
Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Sep;42(9):1106-1114. doi: 10.1177/10711007211002501. Epub 2021 Apr 19.