• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机对照试验:局部皮肤粘合剂与尼龙缝线在足前部手术切口闭合中的比较。

Randomized Controlled Trial of Topical Skin Adhesive vs Nylon Sutures for Incision Closure in Forefoot Surgery.

机构信息

King's Foot and Ankle Unit, King's College NHS Foundation Trust, Orpington, UK.

Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Wakefield, UK.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Sep;42(9):1106-1114. doi: 10.1177/10711007211002501. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1177/10711007211002501
PMID:33870760
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are many options for incision closure in forefoot surgery. The aim of this study was to compare topical skin adhesive (2-octyl-cyanoacrylate) to simple interrupted nylon sutures.

METHODS

A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing topical skin adhesive (TSA) and nylon sutures (NSs) for elective open forefoot surgery. Primary outcome was Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale (HWES) assessed 2 weeks following surgery. Secondary objectives included time taken for wound closure, wound assessment, patient satisfaction with wound cosmesis, incision pain, and infection rate.

RESULTS

Between January and December 2018, 84 feet (70 patients) underwent hallux valgus scarf/Akin osteotomy or first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis and were randomized to receive either intervention (topical skin adhesive) or control (3/0 nylon sutures). We found worse HWES scores when using TSA compared to NSs (1.07 vs 0.60). Incision closure time was slower for TSA (mean, 272 vs 229 seconds). At 2 weeks postoperatively, wound care was faster for TSA (mean 71 secs) vs NSs (mean 120), and patient-reported pain was less with TSA (visual analog scale: TSA 1.2 vs NSs 2.1). A high degree of overall patient satisfaction was reported in both groups, without significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Closure of elective forefoot surgery incisions with topical skin adhesive or interrupted nylon sutures offers high satisfaction rates, low pain scores, and low complications. However, topical skin adhesive was associated with more inflammation and areas of wound separation compared to nylon sutures. We recommend the use of sutures for wound closure in forefoot surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized controlled trial.

摘要

背景

在足前部手术中,有许多切口闭合的选择。本研究的目的是比较局部皮肤粘合剂(2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯)与简单间断尼龙缝线。

方法

一项前瞻性随机对照试验比较了局部皮肤粘合剂(TSA)和尼龙缝线(NSs)在择期开放性足前部手术中的应用。主要结局是术后 2 周时使用 Hollander 伤口评估量表(HWES)评估。次要目标包括伤口闭合时间、伤口评估、患者对伤口美容效果的满意度、切口疼痛和感染率。

结果

2018 年 1 月至 12 月期间,84 只脚(70 例患者)行拇外翻斜行截骨/阿金骨切开术或第一跖趾关节融合术,并随机接受局部皮肤粘合剂或对照(3/0 尼龙缝线)治疗。我们发现使用 TSA 时 HWES 评分比 NSs 差(1.07 比 0.60)。TSA 的切口闭合时间较慢(平均 272 比 229 秒)。术后 2 周时,TSA 的伤口护理更快(平均 71 秒),而 NSs 的伤口护理较慢(平均 120 秒),TSA 的患者报告疼痛较轻(视觉模拟评分:TSA 1.2 比 NSs 2.1)。两组患者均报告了较高的总体满意度,差异无统计学意义。

结论

局部皮肤粘合剂或间断尼龙缝线闭合择期足前部手术切口可获得较高的满意度、较低的疼痛评分和较低的并发症发生率。然而,与尼龙缝线相比,局部皮肤粘合剂与更多的炎症和伤口分离区域相关。我们建议在足前部手术中使用缝线进行伤口闭合。

证据水平

一级,随机对照试验。

相似文献

1
Randomized Controlled Trial of Topical Skin Adhesive vs Nylon Sutures for Incision Closure in Forefoot Surgery.随机对照试验:局部皮肤粘合剂与尼龙缝线在足前部手术切口闭合中的比较。
Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Sep;42(9):1106-1114. doi: 10.1177/10711007211002501. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
2
Comparison of 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate Topical Skin Adhesive and Simple Interrupted Nylon Sutures for Wound Closure in Ankle Fracture Surgery.2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯局部皮肤粘合剂与单纯间断尼龙缝线在踝关节骨折手术中闭合伤口的比较。
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Nov;39(11):1283-1289. doi: 10.1177/1071100718786166. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
3
Octyl-2-cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive Closure Versus Subcuticular Suture for Post-Auricular Incisions.辛基-2-氰基丙烯酸酯组织粘合剂闭合与皮内缝合用于耳后切口。
Laryngoscope. 2024 Sep;134(9):4036-4041. doi: 10.1002/lary.31469. Epub 2024 May 10.
4
2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate Topical Adhesive as an Alternative to Subcuticular Suture for Skin Closure After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial in the Same Patient.2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯局部黏合剂作为全膝关节置换术后皮下缝合替代物用于皮肤闭合:一项在同一患者中的随机对照试验。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Sep;36(9):3141-3147. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.04.033. Epub 2021 May 3.
5
Comparison of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate and n-octyl cyanoacrylate topical skin adhesives for wound closure after ankle fracture surgery: a prospective randomized trial.2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯和正辛基氰基丙烯酸酯局部皮肤黏合剂在踝关节骨折手术后闭合伤口的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 10;13(1):17099. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43471-6.
6
A comparison of three methods of skin closure following repair of Achilles tendon rupture.跟腱断裂修复术后三种皮肤缝合方法的比较。
Injury. 2018 Oct;49(10):1942-1946. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
7
Comparison of laparoscopic port site skin closure techniques (CLOSA): transcutaneous suturing versus subcuticular sutures versus adhesive strips: a prospective single-blinded randomized control trial.腹腔镜切口皮肤缝合技术(CLOSA)的比较:经皮缝合与皮下缝合与胶带的比较:一项前瞻性单盲随机对照试验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jun 8;408(1):228. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02950-0.
8
Use of skin glue versus traditional wound closure methods in brain surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled study.脑外科手术中皮肤胶水与传统伤口闭合方法的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究。
J Clin Neurosci. 2009 Apr;16(4):535-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2008.08.004. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
9
Comparing cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and conventional subcuticular skin sutures for maxillofacial incisions--a prospective randomized trial considering closure time, wound morbidity, and cosmetic outcome.比较氰基丙烯酸酯组织粘合剂与传统皮下皮肤缝线用于颌面切口——一项考虑闭合时间、伤口发病率和美容效果的前瞻性随机试验。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;71(12):2152.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.029.
10
A randomised clinical trial to compare octyl cyanoacrylate with absorbable monofilament sutures for the closure of laparoscopic cholecystectomy port incisions.一项比较辛基氰基丙烯酸酯和可吸收单丝缝线用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术切口闭合的随机临床试验。
Int Wound J. 2020 Apr;17(2):449-454. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13294. Epub 2019 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparison of Tissue Adhesive Material and Suture as Wound-Closure Techniques following Carpal Tunnel Decompression: A Single-Center Randomized Control Trial.腕管减压术后组织黏合材料与缝线作为伤口闭合技术的比较:一项单中心随机对照试验
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 14;12(8):2864. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082864.