• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连接体尺寸和设计对全瓷氧化锆固定义齿抗折性的影响。

Effect of connector size and design on the fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia fixed dental prosthesis.

作者信息

Hafezeqoran Ali, Koodaryan Roodabeh, Hemmati Yasser, Akbarzadeh Ayshin

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Dental faculty, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2020 Fall;14(4):218-222. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2020.039. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

DOI:10.34172/joddd.2020.039
PMID:33575010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7867680/
Abstract

Designing a high strength all-ceramic fixed partial denture with favorable esthetics can be challenging for clinicians; this study aimed to evaluate the effect of connector size and design on the fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses. Two groups of twenty 3-unit monolithic zirconia (Sirona inCoris TZI, Sirona Dental Systems GmbH) bridges, extending from the mandibular first premolar to the first molar with different connector sizes (9 mm and 12 mm), were divided into two subgroups with different connector designs (round and sharp). The specimens were subjected to the three-point bending test to obtain the fracture-bearing load. The results were reported using descriptive statistics (mean ± standard deviation). Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the fracture load in two types of designs for each connector size and two connector size types for each connector design. The significance level was considered at <0.05. The minimum failure load was related to the group with a 9-mm connector size and a sharp embrasure design (1054.4±133.89 N), and the highest mean value belonged to the group with 12-mm connector size and rounded embrasure design (1599.8±167.09 N). Mann-Whitney U test indicated a significant difference between the mean failure load of the rounded and sharp embrasure designs in the 9-mm connector size ( =0.007). However, the difference was insignificant in the 12-mm connector size ( =0.075). Sharp embrasure design is not recommended for high-stress areas with restricted occlusogingival height. A 9-mm2 connector size for 3-unit monolithic zirconia fixed dental prosthesis (FDP), which is recommended by the manufacturer, should be used more cautiously.

摘要

对于临床医生而言,设计一款兼具高强度与良好美学效果的全瓷固定局部义齿颇具挑战性;本研究旨在评估连接体尺寸和设计对整体式氧化锆固定义齿抗折性的影响。两组各20个3单位整体式氧化锆(Sirona inCoris TZI,Sirona Dental Systems GmbH)桥体,从下颌第一前磨牙延伸至第一磨牙,连接体尺寸不同(9毫米和12毫米),再分为连接体设计不同的两个亚组(圆形和尖形)。对样本进行三点弯曲试验以获取抗折载荷。结果采用描述性统计(均值±标准差)报告。使用曼-惠特尼U检验比较每种连接体尺寸的两种设计类型以及每种连接体设计的两种连接体尺寸类型的抗折载荷。显著性水平设定为<0.05。最小破坏载荷与连接体尺寸为9毫米且为尖形龈外展隙设计的组相关(1054.4±133.89牛),最高均值属于连接体尺寸为12毫米且为圆形龈外展隙设计的组(1599.8±167.09牛)。曼-惠特尼U检验表明,9毫米连接体尺寸的圆形和尖形龈外展隙设计的平均破坏载荷之间存在显著差异(=0.007)。然而,12毫米连接体尺寸时差异不显著(=0.075)。对于咬合龈高度受限的高应力区域,不建议采用尖形龈外展隙设计。制造商推荐的用于3单位整体式氧化锆固定义齿(FDP)的9平方毫米连接体尺寸应更谨慎使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ae/7867680/b051028f076a/joddd-14-218-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ae/7867680/b051028f076a/joddd-14-218-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ae/7867680/b051028f076a/joddd-14-218-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of connector size and design on the fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia fixed dental prosthesis.连接体尺寸和设计对全瓷氧化锆固定义齿抗折性的影响。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2020 Fall;14(4):218-222. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2020.039. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
Load-Bearing Capacity of Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Dental Prostheses Fabricated with Different Connector Designs and Embrasure Shaping Methods.不同连接体设计和邻间隙形态对整体氧化锆固定义齿修复体承载能力的影响
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):64-70. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13002. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
3
Flexural strength of small connector designs of zirconia-based partial fixed dental prostheses.氧化锆基局部固定义齿小连接体设计的抗弯强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Feb;115(2):224-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.022. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
4
Connector design effects on the in vitro fracture resistance of 3-unit monolithic prostheses produced from 4 CAD-CAM materials.四种 CAD/CAM 材料制作的 3 单位整体式修复体的连接器设计对体外抗折强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Dec;128(6):1319.e1-1319.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.018. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
5
Influence of connector cross-sectional geometry on the load-bearing capacity under fatigue of implant-supported zirconia fixed partial prosthesis.连接体的横截面形状对种植体支持的氧化锆固定局部义齿疲劳承载能力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Dec;128(6):1335.e1-1335.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.10.008. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
6
Fracture load of metal-ceramic, monolithic, and bi-layered zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses after thermo-mechanical cycling.热机械循环后金属陶瓷、整体式和双层氧化锆基后固定牙科修复体的断裂负荷。
J Dent. 2018 Jun;73:97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
7
Effect of two connector designs on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic core materials for fixed dental prostheses.两种连接体设计对固定义齿全瓷核材料抗折性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Mar;101(3):166-73. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60022-6.
8
Fracture strength of three-unit fixed partial denture cores (Y-TZP) with different connector dimension and design.不同连接体尺寸和设计的三单位固定局部义齿核(Y-TZP)的断裂强度
Swed Dent J. 2009;33(3):149-59.
9
Influence of Radius of Curvature at Gingival Embrasure in Connector Area on Stress Distribution of Three-Unit Posterior Full-Contour Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Partial Denture on Various Amounts of Load Application: A Finite Element Study.连接区龈外展隙处曲率半径对不同加载量下三单位后牙全轮廓整体式氧化锆固定局部义齿应力分布的影响:一项有限元研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2019 Aug 6;9(4):338-348. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_20_19. eCollection 2019 Jul-Aug.
10
Effect of framework design on fracture resistance in zirconia 4-unit all-ceramic fixed partial dentures.框架设计对氧化锆4单位全瓷固定局部义齿抗折性的影响。
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2013;54(3):149-56. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.54.149.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of connector size and configuration on the fracture resistance of a long-span implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed partial denture (An in vitro Study).连接体尺寸和形态对长跨度种植体支持的整体式氧化锆固定局部义齿抗折性的影响(一项体外研究)
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Aug 26;25(1):1375. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06743-3.
2
Fracture resistance of fixed partial dentures: the influence of restoration geometry and material in additive manufacturing.固定局部义齿的抗折性:增材制造中修复体几何形状和材料的影响
J Adv Prosthodont. 2025 Apr;17(2):92-100. doi: 10.4047/jap.2025.17.2.92. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
3
Influence of Pontic Length on the Structural Integrity of Zirconia Fixed Partial Dentures (FPDs).

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of two grading techniques of zirconia material on the fatigue limit of full-contour 3-unit fixed dental prostheses.氧化锆材料的两种分级技术对全冠三单位固定义齿疲劳极限的影响。
Dent Mater. 2017 Apr;33(4):e155-e164. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.12.010. Epub 2017 Jan 21.
2
Fracture rate of monolithic zirconia restorations up to 5 years: A dental laboratory survey.全瓷氧化锆修复体长达5年的骨折率:一项牙科实验室调查。
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Sep;116(3):436-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.033. Epub 2016 May 11.
3
Complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review.
桥体长度对氧化锆固定局部义齿(FPDs)结构完整性的影响。
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Mar 25;16(4):116. doi: 10.3390/jfb16040116.
4
Comparing the influence of cuspal angulation, occlusal loading, and connector widths between tooth- and implant-supported zirconia fixed dental prosthesis.比较牙支持式和种植体支持式氧化锆固定义齿之间牙尖角度、咬合负荷及连接体宽度的影响。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2024 Jul-Aug;80(4):442-448. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2023.10.004. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
5
Implant-supported zirconia fixed partial dentures cantilevered in the lateral-posterior area: A 4-year clinical results.种植体支持的氧化锆固定局部义齿悬臂梁修复后牙区:4年临床结果
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2022 Fall;16(4):258-263. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2022.041. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
6
Performance of high-translucent zirconia CAD/CAM fixed dental prostheses using a digital workflow: A clinical study up to 6 years.使用数字化工作流程的高透光性氧化锆计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造固定义齿的性能:一项长达6年的临床研究
J Dent Sci. 2023 Jan;18(1):44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.07.023. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
7
Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Implant-Supported 3Y-TZP-Zirconia Cantilevers: An In Vitro Study.计算机辅助设计与制造(CAD/CAM)种植体支持的3Y-TZP氧化锆悬臂梁的抗折性:一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Sep 24;15(19):6638. doi: 10.3390/ma15196638.
全牙弓种植体支持的整体式氧化锆固定义齿:一项系统评价
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Jun;115(6):672-677.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.08.025. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
4
Flexural strength of small connector designs of zirconia-based partial fixed dental prostheses.氧化锆基局部固定义齿小连接体设计的抗弯强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Feb;115(2):224-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.022. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
5
Catastrophic failure of a monolithic zirconia prosthesis.整体式氧化锆假体的灾难性失败。
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Feb;113(2):86-90. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.07.016. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
6
Zirconia in fixed prosthesis. A literature review.固定修复体中的氧化锆。文献综述。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2014 Feb 1;6(1):e66-73. doi: 10.4317/jced.51304. eCollection 2014 Feb.
7
Enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns after 6 months of clinical use.临床使用 6 个月后整体氧化锆冠导致的牙釉质磨损。
J Oral Rehabil. 2014 Apr;41(4):314-22. doi: 10.1111/joor.12139. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
8
Clinical risk factors related to failures with zirconia-based restorations: an up to 9-year retrospective study.与氧化锆基修复体失败相关的临床风险因素:一项长达9年的回顾性研究。
J Dent. 2013 Dec;41(12):1164-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
9
Survival and complications of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review.氧化锆基固定义齿修复体的存活率及并发症:一项系统评价。
J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Mar;107(3):170-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60051-1.
10
Effect of connector design on fracture resistance of zirconia all-ceramic fixed partial dentures.连接体设计对氧化锆全瓷固定局部义齿抗折性的影响。
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2011;52(2):61-7. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.52.61.