• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在医疗保健领域实现并维持安全需要机构和个人坚定不移的承诺。

Achieving and Maintaining Safety in Healthcare Requires Unwavering Institutional and Individual Commitments.

作者信息

Rigamonti Daniele, Rigamonti Karen H

机构信息

Neurological Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine International, Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, Baltimore, USA.

Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine International, Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Feb 7;13(2):e13192. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13192.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.13192
PMID:33575159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7870115/
Abstract

In 2000, "To Err Is Human" brought to light the fact that the estimated number of people dying from medical errors occurring in hospitals exceeded those that die from motor vehicle accidents (MVAs), breast cancer, or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) - three causes receiving far more public attention. The report prompted the gradual adoption of safety processes developed in the nuclear and aviation industries. However, sophisticated engineering solutions to operations are not enough. High and low mortality hospitals have similar processes and procedures, but low-mortality hospitals are more proficient at recognizing and managing serious complications as they unfold. This ability to rescue a deteriorating situation (resilience) reflects a healthier safety culture. Organizations move within the safety space in the direction of either more or less resilience depending on the fluctuation of their safety culture. Improving resilience requires transforming learned safety practices into a "habit" in conjunction with accepting accountability. Personal accountability means commitment to safe practices along with effective and transparent reporting of near misses/close calls and adverse events (AEs). Institutional accountability means putting safety first by ensuring the availability of appropriate resources, role leadership modeling, and effective management of sentinel events (SEs) to reduce harm occurrence and re-occurrence. This requires a more robust root cause analysis (RCA) process to guarantee that action plans produce strong and effective corrective measures. Synergistic coaching interventions include instilling the awareness that failure can and will happen, mapping team talents, and assessing gaps. These interventions will optimize group expertise, reaffirming the concept of institutional and personal accountability. The unending performance of drills will sustain the group resilience under both expected and unexpected conditions. Given the strong correlation between practice environment and outcomes, sustained improvement of the safety climate will produce more robust safety behaviors and ultimately better outcomes.

摘要

2000年,《人皆会犯错》揭示了一个事实,即据估计,因医院医疗差错而死亡的人数超过了死于机动车事故、乳腺癌或获得性免疫缺陷综合征(艾滋病)的人数——后三种死因受到公众更多关注。该报告促使医院逐渐采用核工业和航空业所开发的安全流程。然而,仅靠复杂的工程解决方案来应对医疗操作是不够的。死亡率高和低的医院有着相似的流程和程序,但低死亡率医院在严重并发症出现时更善于识别和处理。这种挽救恶化局面的能力(恢复力)反映了一种更健康的安全文化。组织在安全空间内朝着恢复力增强或减弱方向发展,这取决于其安全文化的波动。提高恢复力需要将所学的安全做法转化为一种“习惯”,同时接受问责。个人问责意味着致力于安全做法,并对未遂事件/险情和不良事件(AE)进行有效且透明的报告。机构问责意味着将安全放在首位,确保提供适当资源、发挥领导表率作用,并对警示事件(SE)进行有效管理,以减少伤害的发生和再次发生。这需要一个更强大的根本原因分析(RCA)流程,以确保行动计划能产生有力且有效的纠正措施。协同指导干预措施包括灌输失败可能且将会发生的意识、梳理团队才能以及评估差距。这些干预措施将优化团队专业技能,重申机构和个人问责的理念。持续进行演练将在预期和意外情况下维持团队的恢复力。鉴于实践环境与结果之间存在密切关联,持续改善安全氛围将产生更有力的安全行为,最终带来更好的结果。

相似文献

1
Achieving and Maintaining Safety in Healthcare Requires Unwavering Institutional and Individual Commitments.在医疗保健领域实现并维持安全需要机构和个人坚定不移的承诺。
Cureus. 2021 Feb 7;13(2):e13192. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13192.
2
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
3
Near-misses are an opportunity to improve patient safety: adapting strategies of high reliability organizations to healthcare.险情未遂是改善患者安全的契机:将高可靠性组织的策略应用于医疗保健领域。
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Aug;23(4):292-6. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000177.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
An Analysis of Adverse Events in the Rehabilitation Department: Using the Veterans Affairs Root Cause Analysis System.对康复科不良事件的分析:利用退伍军人事务部根本原因分析系统。
Phys Ther. 2018 Apr 1;98(4):223-230. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy003.
6
Patient safety in otolaryngology: a descriptive review.耳鼻喉科的患者安全:一项描述性综述。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Mar;274(3):1317-1326. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4291-z. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
7
Patient safety in end-stage renal disease: How do we create a safe environment?
Adv Ren Replace Ther. 2001 Apr;8(2):131-7. doi: 10.1053/jarr.2001.23991.
8
Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data.患者安全事件报告能否用于比较医院安全性?对英国国家报告与学习系统数据的定量分析结果
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 9;10(12):e0144107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144107. eCollection 2015.
9
Tuberculosis结核病
10
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
The Next Era of Assessment: Building a Trustworthy Assessment System.评估的新时代:构建一个值得信赖的评估体系。
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Jan 22;13(1):12-23. doi: 10.5334/pme.1110. eCollection 2024.
2
Development and validation of the Nurse Team Resilience Scale (NTRS) in the context of public health emergencies.公共卫生突发事件背景下护士团队复原力量表(NTRS)的编制与验证
BMC Nurs. 2023 Dec 20;22(1):489. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01627-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender Bias in Collaborative Medical Decision Making: Emergent Evidence.协作医疗决策中的性别偏见:新兴证据。
Acad Med. 2020 Oct;95(10):1524-1528. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003590.
2
Coaching as a Mechanism to Challenge Surgical Professional Identities.教练制作为一种挑战外科专业认同的机制。
Ann Surg. 2021 Aug 1;274(2):319-323. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003707.
3
Ethological observations of social behavior in the operating room.手术室中社会行为的行为学观察。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 17;115(29):7575-7580. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716883115. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
4
Our current approach to root cause analysis: is it contributing to our failure to improve patient safety?我们当前的根本原因分析方法:它是否导致了我们在改善患者安全方面的失败?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):381-387. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005991. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
5
Re-examining high reliability: actively organising for safety.重新审视高可靠性:积极组织以确保安全。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Mar;26(3):248-251. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004698. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
6
Importance of teamwork, communication and culture on failure-to-rescue in the elderly.团队合作、沟通及文化对老年人抢救失败的重要性。
Br J Surg. 2016 Jan;103(2):e47-51. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10031. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
7
The underappreciated role of habit in highly reliable healthcare.习惯在高度可靠的医疗保健中未得到充分重视的作用。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Mar;25(3):141-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004512. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
8
The evolving literature on safety WalkRounds: emerging themes and practical messages.关于安全巡查的不断发展的文献:新出现的主题和实用信息。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Oct;23(10):789-800. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003416.
9
Safety organizing, emotional exhaustion, and turnover in hospital nursing units.医院护理单元的安全组织、情绪疲惫与离职。
Med Care. 2014 Oct;52(10):870-6. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000169.
10
The Relationship Between Patient Safety Culture and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review.患者安全文化与患者结局之间的关系:一项系统综述。
J Patient Saf. 2015 Sep;11(3):135-42. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000058.