• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和评估一项质量改进干预措施,以促进责任医疗社区模式中的患者导航。

Developing and Evaluating a Quality Improvement Intervention to Facilitate Patient Navigation in the Accountable Health Communities Model.

作者信息

Holcomb Jennifer L, Walton Gretchen H, Sokale Itunu O, Ferguson Gayla M, Schick Vanessa R, Highfield Linda

机构信息

Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.

Department of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jan 26;8:596873. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.596873. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2021.596873
PMID:33575264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7870472/
Abstract

The Accountable Health Communities (AHC) Model was designed to address the health-related social needs of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services beneficiaries. Bridge organizations across the AHC Model have identified lack of technical assistance and peer planning as potential barriers to Model success, particularly around patient navigation. The technical assistance and peer planning literature lacks an organizing, conceptual framework, but implementation science frameworks could serve as useful guides. The Strengthening Peer AHC Navigation (SPAN) research protocol seeks to fill this gap and will apply three implementation science frameworks, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, Intervention Mapping, and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change compilation, to develop a multi-level quality improvement intervention and evaluate the impact of peer planning on Model outcomes. The aims of the SPAN study are to implement and evaluate a novel multi-level quality improvement intervention to improve AHC implementation and navigation milestones through structured peer planning and to provide successful technical assistance for the AHC Model. The quality improvement intervention is outlined in four Tasks: (1) Assessment - to conduct an assessment of each bridge organization's current implementation, needs, and readiness in AHC Model navigation activities; (2) Planning - to engage in a peer planning approach to build capacity for AHC Model navigation activities; (3) Implementation with technical assistance - Co-creation of a quality improvement protocol for AHC Model navigation activities; and (4) Evaluation - measure the impact of the peer planning and technical assistance approach. Alongside the development and implementation of the quality improvement intervention, this protocol describes a mixed method, convergent parallel study design which will be used to evaluate whether the quality improvement intervention will lead to better outcomes. Tasks will be replicated with five bridge organizations participating in the AHC Model. This research protocol provides a framework that can be used to conduct structured peer planning with technical assistance for social needs programs. This study will provide data on both implementation and outcomes which eventually may impact healthcare cost and utilization.

摘要

accountable health communities(AHC)模式旨在满足医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)受益人的健康相关社会需求。AHC模式中的桥梁组织已确定缺乏技术援助和同行规划是该模式取得成功的潜在障碍,尤其是在患者导航方面。技术援助和同行规划文献缺乏一个组织性的概念框架,但实施科学框架可以作为有用的指南。加强同行AHC导航(SPAN)研究方案旨在填补这一空白,并将应用三个实施科学框架,即实施研究综合框架、干预映射和实施变革专家建议汇编,来制定一个多层次的质量改进干预措施,并评估同行规划对模式结果的影响。SPAN研究的目的是实施和评估一种新颖的多层次质量改进干预措施,通过结构化的同行规划来改善AHC的实施和导航里程碑,并为AHC模式提供成功的技术援助。质量改进干预措施概述为四项任务:(1)评估——对每个桥梁组织在AHC模式导航活动中的当前实施情况、需求和准备情况进行评估;(2)规划——采用同行规划方法来建设AHC模式导航活动的能力;(3)在技术援助下实施——共同创建AHC模式导航活动的质量改进方案;(4)评估——衡量同行规划和技术援助方法的影响。除了质量改进干预措施的开发和实施外,本方案还描述了一种混合方法、收敛平行研究设计,该设计将用于评估质量改进干预措施是否会带来更好的结果。将与参与AHC模式的五个桥梁组织重复这些任务。本研究方案提供了一个框架,可用于为社会需求项目在技术援助下进行结构化的同行规划。这项研究将提供关于实施和结果的数据,最终可能会影响医疗保健成本和利用率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e368/7870472/f4674b9578a6/fmed-08-596873-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e368/7870472/e919e8e20d56/fmed-08-596873-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e368/7870472/f4674b9578a6/fmed-08-596873-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e368/7870472/e919e8e20d56/fmed-08-596873-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e368/7870472/f4674b9578a6/fmed-08-596873-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing and Evaluating a Quality Improvement Intervention to Facilitate Patient Navigation in the Accountable Health Communities Model.开发和评估一项质量改进干预措施,以促进责任医疗社区模式中的患者导航。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jan 26;8:596873. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.596873. eCollection 2021.
2
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of the Accountable Health Communities (AHC) Model: Findings from a between-site qualitative assessment of implementation strategies.实施可问责健康社区(AHC)模式的障碍与促进因素:基于实施策略的跨站点定性评估结果
Front Health Serv. 2022 Nov 2;2:926657. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.926657. eCollection 2022.
3
Addressing Social Needs in Clinical Settings: Early Lessons from Accountable Health Communities.在临床环境中满足社会需求:问责制健康社区的早期经验教训。
Popul Health Manag. 2023 Oct;26(5):283-293. doi: 10.1089/pop.2023.0119.
4
Association of Social Needs and Healthcare Utilization Among Medicare and Medicaid Beneficiaries in the Accountable Health Communities Model.可问责健康社区模式下医疗保险和医疗补助受益人的社会需求与医疗保健利用之间的关联
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(14):3692-3699. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07403-w. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
5
Health Care Impacts Of Resource Navigation For Health-Related Social Needs In The Accountable Health Communities Model.医疗保健中资源导航对责任医疗社区模式下与健康相关的社会需求的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Jun;42(6):822-831. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01502. Epub 2023 May 17.
6
Bridging the knowledge-practice gap in tuberculosis contact management in a high-burden setting: a mixed-methods protocol for a multicenter health system strengthening study.在高负担环境中弥合结核病接触管理中的知识-实践差距:一项多中心卫生系统强化研究的混合方法方案。
Implement Sci. 2019 Mar 19;14(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0870-x.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patient Navigation for Health-Related Social Needs: Reflections From the Accountable Health Communities Model.新冠疫情对健康相关社会需求患者导航的影响:责任医疗社区模式的反思。
Fam Community Health. 2024;47(3):239-247. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0000000000000402. Epub 2024 May 13.
9
Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations in Four States: Implementation and Early Impacts.四个州的医疗补助管理式医疗组织:实施与早期影响。
Milbank Q. 2019 Jun;97(2):583-619. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12386. Epub 2019 Apr 7.
10
Development of a workflow process mapping protocol to inform the implementation of regional patient navigation programs in breast oncology.制定工作流程映射协议以指导乳腺癌肿瘤学中区域性患者导航项目的实施。
Cancer. 2022 Jul 1;128 Suppl 13(Suppl 13):2649-2658. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33944.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-creation of staff training to address health-related social needs in emergencies.共同创建员工培训以应对紧急情况下与健康相关的社会需求。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 9;13:1441368. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1441368. eCollection 2025.
2
Social Risk Screening and Response Equity: Assessment by Race, Ethnicity, and Language in Community Health Centers.社会风险筛查和响应公平性:社区卫生中心的种族、民族和语言评估。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Aug;65(2):286-295. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.02.018. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
3
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of the Accountable Health Communities (AHC) Model: Findings from a between-site qualitative assessment of implementation strategies.

本文引用的文献

1
Data to Care: Lessons Learned From Delivering Technical Assistance to 20 Health Departments.数据关怀:为 20 个卫生部门提供技术援助的经验教训。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Sep 1;82 Suppl 1:S74-S79. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002022.
2
Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions.选择实施策略以解决背景障碍:建议的多样性和未来方向。
Implement Sci. 2019 Apr 29;14(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0892-4.
3
Specifying and comparing implementation strategies across seven large implementation interventions: a practical application of theory.
实施可问责健康社区(AHC)模式的障碍与促进因素:基于实施策略的跨站点定性评估结果
Front Health Serv. 2022 Nov 2;2:926657. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.926657. eCollection 2022.
在七个大型实施干预措施中指定和比较实施策略:理论的实际应用。
Implement Sci. 2019 Mar 21;14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0876-4.
4
The Medicalization of Population Health: Who Will Stay Upstream?人群健康的医学化:谁将站在上游?
Milbank Q. 2019 Mar;97(1):36-39. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12363. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
5
Development of an Implementation Intervention Using Intervention Mapping to Increase Mammography Among Low Income Women.运用干预映射法开发实施干预措施以提高低收入女性的乳房X光检查率
Front Public Health. 2018 Oct 26;6:300. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00300. eCollection 2018.
6
The application of implementation science theories for population health: A critical interpretive synthesis.实施科学理论在人群健康中的应用:一项批判性诠释性综述。
AIMS Public Health. 2018 Mar 12;5(1):13-30. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2018.1.13. eCollection 2018.
7
Adapting the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to Create Organizational Readiness and Implementation Tools for Project ECHO.调整实施研究综合框架,为ECHO项目创建组织准备情况和实施工具。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2018 Spring;38(2):145-151. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000195.
8
No Equity, No Triple Aim: Strategic Proposals to Advance Health Equity in a Volatile Policy Environment.没有公平,就没有三重目标:在动荡的政策环境中促进健康公平的战略建议。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Dec;107(S3):S223-S228. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304000.
9
Improving the appropriateness of antipsychotic prescribing in nursing homes: a mixed-methods process evaluation of an academic detailing intervention.提高养老院中抗精神病药物处方的合理性:一项针对学术指导干预措施的混合方法过程评估
Implement Sci. 2017 May 26;12(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0602-z.
10
Evaluating the Accountable Health Communities Demonstration Project.评估可问责健康社区示范项目。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Mar;32(3):345-349. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3920-y. Epub 2016 Nov 14.