Department of Research and Population Health, Caring Health Center, Springfield, Massachusetts.
Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente and OCHIN, Inc., Portland, Oregon.
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Aug;65(2):286-295. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.02.018. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
Little has previously been reported about the implementation of social risk screening across racial/ethnic/language groups. To address this knowledge gap, the associations between race/ethnicity/language, social risk screening, and patient-reported social risks were examined among adult patients at community health centers.
Patient- and encounter-level data from 2016 to 2020 from 651 community health centers in 21 U.S. states were used; data were extracted from a shared Epic electronic health record and analyzed between December 2020 and February 2022. In adjusted logistic regression analyses stratified by language, robust sandwich variance SE estimators were applied with clustering on patient's primary care facility.
Social risk screening occurred at 30% of health centers; 11% of eligible adult patients were screened. Screening and reported needs varied significantly by race/ethnicity/language. Black Hispanic and Black non-Hispanic patients were approximately twice as likely to be screened, and Hispanic White patients were 28% less likely to be screened than non-Hispanic White patients. Hispanic Black patients were 87% less likely to report social risks than non-Hispanic White patients. Among patients who preferred a language other than English or Spanish, Black Hispanic patients were 90% less likely to report social needs than non-Hispanic White patients.
Social risk screening documentation and patient reports of social risks differed by race/ethnicity/language in community health centers. Although social care initiatives are intended to promote health equity, inequitable screening practices could inadvertently undermine this goal. Future implementation research should explore strategies for equitable screening and related interventions.
此前,关于在不同种族/民族/语言群体中实施社会风险筛查的报道甚少。为了弥补这一知识空白,本研究在美国 21 个州的 651 家社区卫生中心,调查了成年患者的种族/民族/语言、社会风险筛查与患者报告的社会风险之间的关系。
本研究使用了 2016 年至 2020 年来自美国 21 个州的 651 家社区卫生中心的患者和就诊数据;数据从共享的 Epic 电子健康记录中提取,并于 2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 2 月进行分析。在按语言分层的调整后逻辑回归分析中,采用了基于患者初级保健机构的稳健沙盒方差 SE 估计量进行聚类。
有 30%的卫生中心进行了社会风险筛查;11%的合格成年患者接受了筛查。筛查和报告的需求因种族/民族/语言而有显著差异。黑西班牙裔和黑非西班牙裔患者被筛查的可能性约为非西班牙裔白种患者的两倍,西班牙裔白种患者被筛查的可能性比非西班牙裔白种患者低 28%。西班牙裔黑种患者报告社会风险的可能性比非西班牙裔白种患者低 87%。在选择英语或西班牙语以外语言的患者中,黑西班牙裔患者报告社会需求的可能性比非西班牙裔白种患者低 90%。
在社区卫生中心,社会风险筛查的记录和患者报告的社会风险因种族/民族/语言而异。尽管社会关怀计划旨在促进健康公平,但不公平的筛查实践可能会无意中破坏这一目标。未来的实施研究应探索公平筛查和相关干预措施的策略。