• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长读长校正方法的基准测试。

Benchmarking of long-read correction methods.

作者信息

Dohm Juliane C, Peters Philipp, Stralis-Pavese Nancy, Himmelbauer Heinz

机构信息

Institute of Computational Biology, Department of Biotechnology, University of Life Sciences and Natural Resources, Vienna (BOKU), Muthgasse 18, 1190 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

NAR Genom Bioinform. 2020 May 25;2(2):lqaa037. doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqaa037. eCollection 2020 Jun.

DOI:10.1093/nargab/lqaa037
PMID:33575591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7671305/
Abstract

Third-generation sequencing technologies provided by Pacific Biosciences and Oxford Nanopore Technologies generate read lengths in the scale of kilobasepairs. However, these reads display high error rates, and correction steps are necessary to realize their great potential in genomics and transcriptomics. Here, we compare properties of PacBio and Nanopore data and assess correction methods by Canu, MARVEL and proovread in various combinations. We found total error rates of around 13% in the raw datasets. PacBio reads showed a high rate of insertions (around 8%) whereas Nanopore reads showed similar rates for substitutions, insertions and deletions of around 4% each. In data from both technologies the errors were uniformly distributed along reads apart from noisy 5' ends, and homopolymers appeared among the most over-represented kmers relative to a reference. Consensus correction using read overlaps reduced error rates to about 1% when using Canu or MARVEL after patching. The lowest error rate in Nanopore data (0.45%) was achieved by applying proovread on MARVEL-patched data including Illumina short-reads, and the lowest error rate in PacBio data (0.42%) was the result of Canu correction with minimap2 alignment after patching. Our study provides valuable insights and benchmarks regarding long-read data and correction methods.

摘要

太平洋生物科学公司(Pacific Biosciences)和牛津纳米孔技术公司(Oxford Nanopore Technologies)提供的第三代测序技术可生成数千碱基对规模的读长。然而,这些读长显示出高错误率,因此需要校正步骤来实现它们在基因组学和转录组学中的巨大潜力。在此,我们比较了PacBio和纳米孔数据的特性,并评估了Canu、MARVEL和proovread以各种组合方式进行的校正方法。我们发现原始数据集中的总错误率约为13%。PacBio读长显示出较高的插入率(约8%),而纳米孔读长在替换、插入和缺失方面的比率相似,均约为4%。在这两种技术的数据中,除了有噪声的5'端外,错误沿读长均匀分布,并且相对于参考序列,同聚物出现在最丰富的kmer之中。当在修补后使用Canu或MARVEL时,利用读长重叠进行的一致性校正可将错误率降低至约1%。通过对包括Illumina短读长在内的MARVEL修补后的数据应用proovread,纳米孔数据实现了最低错误率(0.45%),而PacBio数据的最低错误率(0.42%)是修补后使用minimap2比对进行Canu校正的结果。我们的研究提供了关于长读长数据和校正方法的宝贵见解及基准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/09bebf1598f0/lqaa037fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/88eb90c68bda/lqaa037fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/8749b67c86cb/lqaa037fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/20066563814a/lqaa037fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/ee357e1e473f/lqaa037fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/50e08129eeca/lqaa037fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/12f0811271df/lqaa037fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/10309091122f/lqaa037fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/48c46b26ffce/lqaa037fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/7399061e979e/lqaa037fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/e68d115dad7c/lqaa037fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/09bebf1598f0/lqaa037fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/88eb90c68bda/lqaa037fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/8749b67c86cb/lqaa037fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/20066563814a/lqaa037fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/ee357e1e473f/lqaa037fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/50e08129eeca/lqaa037fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/12f0811271df/lqaa037fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/10309091122f/lqaa037fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/48c46b26ffce/lqaa037fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/7399061e979e/lqaa037fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/e68d115dad7c/lqaa037fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/83c4/7671305/09bebf1598f0/lqaa037fig11.jpg

相似文献

1
Benchmarking of long-read correction methods.长读长校正方法的基准测试。
NAR Genom Bioinform. 2020 May 25;2(2):lqaa037. doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqaa037. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
HISEA: HIerarchical SEed Aligner for PacBio data.HISEA:用于PacBio数据的分层种子比对器。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Dec 19;18(1):564. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1953-9.
3
The long and short of it: benchmarking viromics using Illumina, Nanopore and PacBio sequencing technologies.简而言之:使用Illumina、Nanopore和PacBio测序技术对病毒组进行基准测试。
Microb Genom. 2024 Feb;10(2). doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.001198.
4
De novo Nanopore read quality improvement using deep learning.基于深度学习的从头纳米孔读质量改进。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2019 Nov 6;20(1):552. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3103-z.
5
Improved assembly of noisy long reads by k-mer validation.通过k-mer验证改进嘈杂长读段的组装。
Genome Res. 2016 Dec;26(12):1710-1720. doi: 10.1101/gr.209247.116. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
6
Evaluation of tools for long read RNA-seq splice-aware alignment.长读 RNA-seq 剪接感知比对工具评估。
Bioinformatics. 2018 Mar 1;34(5):748-754. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx668.
7
Benchmarking long-read genome sequence alignment tools for human genomics applications.用于人类基因组学应用的长读长基因组序列比对工具的基准测试。
PeerJ. 2023 Dec 18;11:e16515. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16515. eCollection 2023.
8
LRCstats, a tool for evaluating long reads correction methods.LRCstats,一种用于评估长读纠错方法的工具。
Bioinformatics. 2017 Nov 15;33(22):3652-3654. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx489.
9
Hybrid correction of highly noisy long reads using a variable-order de Bruijn graph.使用变阶 de Bruijn 图对高度嘈杂的长读进行混合纠错。
Bioinformatics. 2018 Dec 15;34(24):4213-4222. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty521.
10
Bi-level error correction for PacBio long reads.用于PacBio长读段的双水平错误校正
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2020 May-June;17(3):899-905. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2017.2780832. Epub 2017 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Why Are Long-Read Sequencing Methods Revolutionizing Microbiome Analysis?为什么长读长测序方法正在彻底改变微生物组分析?
Microorganisms. 2025 Aug 9;13(8):1861. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13081861.
2
Benchmarking of bioinformatics tools for the hybrid assembly of human and non-human whole-genome sequencing data.用于人类和非人类全基因组测序数据混合组装的生物信息学工具的基准测试。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2025 Jul 13;27:3099-3109. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2025.07.020. eCollection 2025.
3
De novo transcriptome assembly of Acartia tonsa adults using Nanopore long-read sequencing.

本文引用的文献

1
Accurate circular consensus long-read sequencing improves variant detection and assembly of a human genome.精确的圆形共识长读测序提高了人类基因组变异检测和组装的准确性。
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Oct;37(10):1155-1162. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0217-9. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
2
Sequencing of human genomes with nanopore technology.纳米孔技术测序人类基因组。
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 23;10(1):1869. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09637-5.
3
Errors in long-read assemblies can critically affect protein prediction.长读长组装中的错误会严重影响蛋白质预测。
使用纳米孔长读长测序对中华哲水蚤成虫进行从头转录组组装。
Sci Data. 2025 Jul 1;12(1):1112. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05399-6.
4
Pooled, Long-read Sequencing for Structural Variant Characterization in Schistosome Populations.用于血吸虫种群结构变异特征分析的合并长读长测序
Genome Biol Evol. 2025 Jul 3;17(7). doi: 10.1093/gbe/evaf127.
5
Accurate genotyping of three major respiratory bacterial pathogens with ONT R10.4.1 long-read sequencing.使用ONT R10.4.1长读长测序对三种主要呼吸道细菌病原体进行准确基因分型。
Genome Res. 2025 Aug 1;35(8):1758-1766. doi: 10.1101/gr.279829.124.
6
Do we need a standardized 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing analysis protocol for poultry microbiota research?家禽微生物群研究是否需要标准化的16S rRNA基因扩增子测序分析方案?
Poult Sci. 2025 Jul;104(7):105242. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105242. Epub 2025 May 1.
7
Influence of Sequencing Technology on Pangenome-Level Analysis and Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in ESKAPE Pathogens.测序技术对泛基因组水平分析及ESKAPE病原体中抗菌药物耐药基因检测的影响
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 26;12(4):ofaf183. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf183. eCollection 2025 Apr.
8
Development of a Clinically Applicable High-Resolution Assay for Sperm Mosaicism.一种适用于临床的精子嵌合体高分辨率检测方法的开发。
J Mol Diagn. 2025 Jun;27(6):525-537. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.03.002. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
9
GoldPolish-target: targeted long-read genome assembly polishing.GoldPolish目标:靶向长读长基因组组装优化
BMC Bioinformatics. 2025 Mar 7;26(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12859-025-06091-7.
10
Unsupervised detection of novel SARS-CoV-2 mutations and lineages in wastewater samples using long-read sequencing.使用长读长测序技术对废水样本中新型严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)突变和谱系进行无监督检测。
BMC Genomics. 2025 Jan 29;26(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-11255-z.
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Feb;37(2):124-126. doi: 10.1038/s41587-018-0004-z.
4
BulkVis: a graphical viewer for Oxford nanopore bulk FAST5 files.BulkVis:用于牛津纳米孔批量 FAST5 文件的图形查看器。
Bioinformatics. 2019 Jul 1;35(13):2193-2198. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty841.
5
Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences.Minimap2:核苷酸序列的两两比对。
Bioinformatics. 2018 Sep 15;34(18):3094-3100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191.
6
The axolotl genome and the evolution of key tissue formation regulators.蝾螈基因组与关键组织形成调控因子的演化。
Nature. 2018 Feb 1;554(7690):50-55. doi: 10.1038/nature25458. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
7
The genome of Schmidtea mediterranea and the evolution of core cellular mechanisms.地中海星虫的基因组与核心细胞机制的演化。
Nature. 2018 Feb 1;554(7690):56-61. doi: 10.1038/nature25473. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
8
MinION-based long-read sequencing and assembly extends the reference genome.基于 MinION 的长读测序和组装扩展了参考基因组。
Genome Res. 2018 Feb;28(2):266-274. doi: 10.1101/gr.221184.117. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
9
Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive -mer weighting and repeat separation.Canu:通过自适应k-mer加权和重复序列分离实现可扩展且准确的长读长序列拼接
Genome Res. 2017 May;27(5):722-736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
10
Innovations and challenges in detecting long read overlaps: an evaluation of the state-of-the-art.检测长读重叠中的创新与挑战:对当前技术水平的评估
Bioinformatics. 2017 Apr 15;33(8):1261-1270. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw811.