The University of Texas at Austin, USA.
Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2022 Jan-Feb;55(1):3-21. doi: 10.1177/0022219421991249. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
This systematic review synthesizes fluency intervention research for struggling readers in Grades 6 through 12 from January 2006 to October 2019. The search yielded 17 studies examining reading fluency and comprehension outcomes. Most studies examined repeated reading (RR) interventions to improve reading fluency for struggling readers at these grade levels, resulting in improved fluency but few positive effects on reading comprehension outcomes, similar to trends observed in prior systematic reviews. Reading connected text with an equivalent word count to word counts of RR sessions did not result in increased reading fluency, a finding aligned with a prior synthesis. Few studies used a fluent reader as a model prior to RRs, despite previous support for modeling within fluency interventions.
本系统综述综合了 2006 年 1 月至 2019 年 10 月 6 至 12 年级阅读困难学生的流畅性干预研究。检索结果包括 17 项研究,这些研究考察了阅读流畅性和阅读理解结果。大多数研究考察了重复阅读(RR)干预措施,以提高这些年级阅读困难学生的阅读流畅性,结果提高了流畅性,但对阅读理解结果的积极影响很少,与之前的系统综述观察到的趋势相似。阅读与 RR 会话的字数相等的连接文本并没有提高阅读流畅性,这一发现与之前的综合研究一致。很少有研究在进行 RR 之前使用流利的读者作为模型,尽管之前在流畅性干预中支持使用模型。