Stühler Viktoria, Rausch Steffen, Maas Jan Moritz, Stenzl Arnulf, Bedke Jens
Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2021 Sep;21(9):1215-1226. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2021.1890713. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
We have experienced several paradigm shifts and substantial changes in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) over the last two decades. Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as a dual combination (ICI-ICI) or with VEGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGF-TKI) has shown remarkable efficacy in mRCC patients and has become the standard of care in first-line therapy.
In this review, we will discuss the background as well as the benefits of combining ICI with TKI compared to ICI-ICI combination therapy for mRCC treatment and will also briefly highlight biomarkers for patient selection on therapies to improve patient outcomes and limit toxicities.
Due to the mediated additional anti-tumor effects, there is a strong rationale to combine ICIs and TKIs for mRCC therapy. When comparing first-line therapy options, the exceptionally higher ORR and PFS for the ICI-TKI combinations should be highlighted, whereas, nevertheless, the complete response rate is slightly higher for the ICI-ICI combination. In terms of an individualized therapeutic approach, biomarkers predicting the success or failure of an anti-VEGF-based regimen or ICI therapy as a corresponding mono - or combination therapy are lacking so far, however, gene expression signatures can be a landmark in this field.
在过去二十年中,转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的治疗经历了几次范式转变和重大变革。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)作为双联组合(ICI-ICI)或与血管内皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(VEGF-TKI)联合治疗在mRCC患者中显示出显著疗效,并已成为一线治疗的标准方案。
在本综述中,我们将讨论与ICI-ICI联合疗法相比,ICI与TKI联合治疗mRCC的背景及益处,还将简要强调用于患者治疗选择的生物标志物,以改善患者预后并限制毒性。
由于介导的额外抗肿瘤作用,将ICI和TKI联合用于mRCC治疗有充分的理论依据。在比较一线治疗方案时,应突出ICI-TKI联合方案异常高的客观缓解率(ORR)和无进展生存期(PFS),然而,ICI-ICI联合方案的完全缓解率略高。就个体化治疗方法而言,目前缺乏预测基于抗VEGF方案或ICI治疗作为相应单药或联合治疗成败的生物标志物,不过,基因表达特征可能是该领域的一个里程碑。