LEPABE - Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
INIAV - National Institute for Agrarian and Veterinarian Research, Rua dos Lagidos, Lugar da Madalena, Vairão, Vila do Conde, Portugal.
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2246:69-86. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1115-9_5.
Traditionally, RNA and DNA probes are used in fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) methods for microbial detection and characterization of communities' structure and diversity. However, the recent introduction of nucleic acid mimics (NAMs) has improved the robustness of the FISH methods in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Several NAMs have been used, of which the most relevant are peptide nucleic acid (PNA), locked nucleic acids (LNA), 2'-O-methyl RNA (2'OMe), and phosphorothioates (PS). In this chapter, we describe a protocol using PNA and LNA/2'OMe probes for microbial detection by FISH, pointing out the differences between them. These protocols are easily adapted to different microorganisms and different probe sequences.
传统上,荧光原位杂交(FISH)方法中使用 RNA 和 DNA 探针来检测微生物并描述群落结构和多样性。然而,核酸类似物(NAMs)的最近引入提高了 FISH 方法在灵敏度和特异性方面的稳健性。已经使用了几种 NAMs,其中最相关的是肽核酸(PNA)、锁核酸(LNA)、2'-O-甲基 RNA(2'OMe)和硫代磷酸酯(PS)。在本章中,我们描述了使用 PNA 和 LNA/2'OMe 探针通过 FISH 进行微生物检测的方案,指出了它们之间的差异。这些方案很容易适应不同的微生物和不同的探针序列。