Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2022 Jan 1;41(1):1-11. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000767.
MLH1/PMS2 loss due to epigenetic hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter is the most common cause of mismatch repair deficiency in endometrial carcinoma, and typically provides reassurance against an associated germline mutation. To further characterize the genetic features of MLH1/PMS2-deficient endometrial cancers, the departmental database was searched for cases with dual MLH1/PMS2 loss and retained MSH2/6 expression which underwent MLH1 hypermethylation testing. Genetic testing results were obtained when available. One hundred seventeen endometrial cancers met inclusion criteria: 100 (85%) were MLH1-hypermethylated, 3 (3%) were low-level/borderline, 7 (6%) were nonmethylated, and 7 (6%) were insufficient for testing. Sixteen cases (12 MLH1-hypermethylated, 3 nonmethylated, and 1 insufficient for testing) underwent germline testing, 6 of which (37.5%) demonstrated germline variants of unknown significance (VUS) (MSH6, PMS2, POLD1, BRIP1, RAD51D, CHEK2) but no known deleterious mutations. Notably, however, the patients harboring the MSH6 and PMS2 germline VUS had clinical features concerning for Lynch syndrome. One nonmethylated, germline-normal case underwent somatic tumor testing, and demonstrated a somatic MLH1 mutation. In summary, MLH1-hypermethylation accounts for the vast majority of MLH1/PMS2-deficient cancers in a universally screened population, although MLH1 somatic and germline mutations can occur. Occasionally, patients with MLH1-hypermethlated tumors also bear germline VUS in other mismatch repair genes as well as genes implicated in other hereditary cancer syndromes, but their clinical relevance is unclear. Family and personal cancer histories must always be evaluated to determine the need for germline testing in women with loss of MLH1/PMS2, even in the setting of hypermethylation.
MLH1/PMS2 缺失由于 MLH1 启动子的表观遗传超甲基化是子宫内膜癌中错配修复缺陷最常见的原因,通常可以排除相关种系突变。为了进一步描述 MLH1/PMS2 缺陷型子宫内膜癌的遗传特征,本部门数据库中搜索了同时存在 MLH1/PMS2 缺失和保留 MSH2/6 表达且 MLH1 发生高甲基化的病例,并进行了 MLH1 高甲基化检测。在有条件的情况下,获得了遗传检测结果。共有 117 例子宫内膜癌符合纳入标准:100 例(85%)为 MLH1 高甲基化,3 例(3%)为低水平/边界,7 例(6%)为非甲基化,7 例(6%)为检测不足。16 例(12 例 MLH1 高甲基化、3 例非甲基化和 1 例检测不足)进行了种系检测,其中 6 例(37.5%)存在种系意义未明的变异(VUS)(MSH6、PMS2、POLD1、BRIP1、RAD51D、CHEK2),但没有已知的有害突变。然而,携带 MSH6 和 PMS2 种系 VUS 的患者具有令人担忧的林奇综合征的临床特征。1 例非甲基化、种系正常的病例进行了体细胞肿瘤检测,发现了一个体细胞 MLH1 突变。总之,在普遍筛查的人群中,MLH1 高甲基化几乎是 MLH1/PMS2 缺陷型癌症的主要原因,尽管也可能发生 MLH1 体细胞和种系突变。偶尔,MLH1 高甲基化肿瘤的患者还携带其他错配修复基因以及其他遗传性癌症综合征相关基因的种系 VUS,但它们的临床意义尚不清楚。无论在何种情况下,对于 MLH1/PMS2 缺失的女性,即使存在高甲基化,也必须评估家族和个人癌症史,以确定是否需要进行种系检测。