• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非手术治疗 III 型急性枢椎骨折具有良好的预后:212 例连续病例系列研究。

Favorable prognosis with nonsurgical management of type III acute odontoid fractures: a consecutive series of 212 patients.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway; Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Spine J. 2021 Jul;21(7):1149-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2021.02.003
PMID:33577924
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The recommended primary treatment for type III odontoid fractures (OFx) is external immobilization, except for patients having major displacement of the odontoid fragment. The bony fusion rate of type III OFx has been reported to be >85%. High compliance to treatment recommendations is favorable only if the treatment leads to a good outcome.

PURPOSE

The primary aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcome after conservative and surgical treatment of type III OFx and to reaffirm that primary external immobilization is the best treatment for most type III fractures.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective study based on a prospective database.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Two hundred twelve consecutive patients with type III OFx treated at Oslo University Hospital over an 8-year period (2009-2017).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Long-term rates of bony fusion, crossover from primary conservative treatment to surgical fixation, new onset spinal cord injury (SCI), severe persistent neck pain (visual analogue scale - VAS), and persistent disability measured with Neck Disability index (NDI).

METHODS

The present study was based on data extracted from our quality control database for acute cervical spine fractures from a general population. During the years 2018 to 2019 long-term follow-up of alive patients was performed (median follow-up time was 38.0 months; range 3.0-108.0 months). The follow-up included neurological examination, radiological examination and scoring of bony fusion status, crossover from primary conservative treatment to surgical fixation, new onset SCI, neck pain, and Neck Disability Index (NDI score).

RESULTS

In this consecutive series of 212 patients with type III acute OFx, median patient age was 72 years, 56% had severe preinjury comorbidities (ASA score ≥3) and 22% lived dependently. Severe comorbidities and dependent living were significantly associated with increasing age (p<.001). The trauma mechanism was fall injury in 82%. The median age of patients injured by falls was significantly higher than in patients with a nonfall injury (p<.001). At the time of diagnosis, 4% had an OFx related SCI. Primary treatment was external immobilization alone in 95.3% and open surgical fixation in 4.7%. Patients treated with primary external immobilization alone presented with significantly less translation of the odontoid fragment (p<.001) and less angulation of the odontoid fragment (p=.025) than patients treated with primary surgery. Subsequent crossover to surgical fixation was performed in 5.4%. At long-term follow-up, 95.7% of patients had bony fusion of the OFx, 80.5% had minimal/no neck pain, and none developed new onset SCI. There was no significant difference in long-term follow-up VAS (p=.444) or NDI (p=.562) between the primary external immobilization group and the primary surgical group.

CONCLUSION

This study reaffirms that nonsurgical treatment remains the preferable option in the majority of patients with type III OFx.

摘要

背景

III 型齿状突骨折(OFx)的推荐主要治疗方法是外部固定,除非有齿状突骨折块的明显移位。III 型 OFx 的骨融合率已报道>85%。只有当治疗导致良好的结果时,治疗建议的高度依从性才是有利的。

目的

本研究的主要目的是确定保守和手术治疗 III 型 OFx 的长期结果,并再次确认原发性外部固定是治疗大多数 III 型骨折的最佳方法。

研究设计/设置:基于前瞻性数据库的回顾性研究。

患者样本

2009-2017 年期间在奥斯陆大学医院接受治疗的 212 例连续 III 型 OFx 患者。

结局指标

骨融合的长期比率、从原发性保守治疗转为手术固定的交叉率、新发脊髓损伤(SCI)、严重持续性颈部疼痛(视觉模拟量表-VAS)和使用颈部残疾指数(NDI)测量的持续性残疾。

方法

本研究基于我们一般人群急性颈椎骨折质量控制数据库中提取的数据。在 2018 年至 2019 年期间对存活患者进行了长期随访(中位随访时间为 38.0 个月;范围 3.0-108.0 个月)。随访包括神经学检查、影像学检查和骨融合状态评分、从原发性保守治疗转为手术固定、新发 SCI、颈部疼痛和颈部残疾指数(NDI 评分)。

结果

在这一系列 212 例连续 III 型急性 OFx 患者中,中位患者年龄为 72 岁,56%有严重的术前合并症(ASA 评分≥3),22%生活依赖。严重合并症和生活依赖与年龄增长显著相关(p<.001)。创伤机制为 82%的跌倒损伤。跌倒损伤患者的中位年龄明显高于非跌倒损伤患者(p<.001)。在诊断时,有 4%的 OFx 相关 SCI。95.3%的患者接受单纯外部固定治疗,4.7%的患者接受开放性手术固定治疗。接受单纯外固定治疗的患者的齿状突骨折块移位明显较小(p<.001),齿状突骨折块成角明显较小(p=.025),与接受单纯手术治疗的患者相比。随后交叉到手术固定的比例为 5.4%。长期随访时,95.7%的患者 OFx 骨融合,80.5%的患者颈部疼痛最小/无,无新发 SCI。原发性外部固定组和原发性手术组在长期随访的 VAS(p=.444)或 NDI(p=.562)方面无显著差异。

结论

本研究再次证实,非手术治疗仍然是大多数 III 型 OFx 患者的首选治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Favorable prognosis with nonsurgical management of type III acute odontoid fractures: a consecutive series of 212 patients.非手术治疗 III 型急性枢椎骨折具有良好的预后:212 例连续病例系列研究。
Spine J. 2021 Jul;21(7):1149-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
2
Management and long-term outcome of type II acute odontoid fractures: a population-based consecutive series of 282 patients.Ⅱ型急性枢椎骨折的治疗与长期预后:一项基于人群的 282 例连续病例系列研究。
Spine J. 2021 Apr;21(4):627-637. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.11.012. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
3
Odontoid fractures: impact of age and comorbidities on surgical decision making.齿突骨折:年龄和合并症对手术决策的影响。
BMC Surg. 2020 Oct 14;20(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00893-7.
4
Surgical management of acute odontoid fractures: surgery-related complications and long-term outcomes in a consecutive series of 97 patients.急性枢椎骨折的手术治疗:97 例连续病例的手术相关并发症和长期结果。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Mar;72(3):682-90. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318236b675.
5
Surgical vs. non-surgical management of displaced type-2 odontoid fractures in patients aged 75 years and older: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.75岁及以上患者移位型Ⅱ型齿状突骨折的手术与非手术治疗:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Aug 22;19(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2690-8.
6
Functional Outcome of Elderly Patients Treated for Odontoid Fracture: A Multicenter Study.老年齿状突骨折患者的功能预后:一项多中心研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jul 1;44(13):951-958. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002982.
7
Type II odontoid fracture in elderly patients treated conservatively: is fracture healing the goal?老年患者保守治疗的 II 型齿状突骨折:目标是骨折愈合吗?
Eur Spine J. 2019 May;28(5):1064-1071. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05898-2. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
8
[Anterior osteosynthesis of odontoid fractures].[齿状突骨折的前路骨合成]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2008 Oct;75(5):332-8.
9
Primary surgical management by reduction and fixation of unstable hangman's fractures with discoligamentous instability or combined fractures: clinical article.经口咽前路松解复位固定术治疗不稳定 Hangman 骨折伴或不伴附件骨折:临床研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Nov;19(5):569-75. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.SPINE12948. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
10
Management of type II odontoid fractures in the geriatric population: outcome of treatment in a rigid cervical orthosis.老年人群中II型齿状突骨折的治疗:刚性颈椎矫形器治疗的结果
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Jul;23(5):317-20. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181b11d9f.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome of Conservative Treatment of Odontoid Fractures in Elderly Patients Over 80 Years Old.80岁以上老年患者齿状突骨折保守治疗的结果
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2025 Mar 11;16:21514593251315589. doi: 10.1177/21514593251315589. eCollection 2025.
2
Addressing the challenges of complex type III odontoid fractures: Clinical and radiological outcomes of various treatment modalities.应对复杂III型齿状突骨折的挑战:各种治疗方式的临床和放射学结果
J Orthop. 2024 Aug 18;60:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.08.010. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Epidemiology of traumatic cervical spinal fractures in a general Norwegian population.
挪威普通人群创伤性颈椎骨折的流行病学研究
Inj Epidemiol. 2022 Mar 24;9(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40621-022-00374-w.