Bitzer Eva Maria, Ansmann Lena, Hörold Madlen, Lyssenko Lisa, Apfelbacher Christian
Institut für Alltagskultur und Bewegung und Gesundheit, Fachrichtung: Public Health & Health Education, Pädagogische Hochschule Freiburg, Kunzenweg 21, 79117, Freiburg, Deutschland.
Fakultät VI Medizin und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Organisationsbezogene Versorgungsforschung, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Deutschland.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Mar;64(3):277-284. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03282-4. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, sharp disruptions of healthcare utilization for noncommunicable diseases were observed to some extent because of people's fear of infection. We undertook a review of German healthcare institutions asking: To what extent were people supported in their decisions (not) to seek medical care for health problems other than COVID-19?
Content analysis of the websites of the members of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF; n = 179), the association of statutory (dental) health insurance physicians (K(Z)Vs; n = 38), selected health insurances (n = 21), selected healthcare institutions (n = 25), and supraregional health information providers (n = 5) for information and offers that address people with noncommunicable diseases.
The examined websites provide information about COVID-19, but only rarely about how to behave in the case of another (suspected) disease regarding healthcare utilization. Two health information provider portals, one health insurance company, but none of the KVs offer explicit decision support. KVs refer more often, but not consistently, to the general possibility of video consulting.
Information concerning the topic is scarce for most of the patients. In the face of the ongoing pandemic, it is important to expand existing, trustworthy, high-quality information and advisory capacities to increase their profile in order to enable health-literate decisions even during a pandemic.
在新冠疫情期间,由于人们对感染的恐惧,非传染性疾病的医疗服务利用出现了一定程度的急剧中断。我们对德国医疗机构进行了一项综述,提出以下问题:在多大程度上,人们在决定(不)就新冠疫情以外的健康问题寻求医疗护理时得到了支持?
对科学医学协会(AWMF;n = 179)、法定(牙科)健康保险医师协会(K(Z)Vs;n = 38)、选定的健康保险公司(n = 21)、选定的医疗机构(n = 25)以及超区域健康信息提供者(n = 5)的网站进行内容分析,以获取针对非传染性疾病患者的信息和服务。
所审查的网站提供了有关新冠疫情的信息,但很少提及在出现另一种(疑似)疾病时关于医疗服务利用的应对方式。两个健康信息提供者门户网站、一家健康保险公司提供了明确的决策支持,但K(Z)Vs均未提供。K(Z)Vs更频繁但并非始终一致地提及视频咨询的一般可能性。
对于大多数患者而言,有关该主题的信息匮乏。面对持续的疫情,扩大现有的、可靠的、高质量的信息和咨询能力以提高其知名度非常重要,以便即使在疫情期间也能做出具备健康素养的决策。