• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[疼痛相关经验性回避的测量:慢性疼痛患者的接纳与行动问卷-II-疼痛分析]

[Measurement of pain-related experiential avoidance: analysis of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II-Pain in patients with chronic pain].

作者信息

Majeed Ronja, Faust Ira, Hüppe Michael, Hermann Christiane

机构信息

Abteilung Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Otto-Behaghel-Str. 10F, 35394, Gießen, Deutschland.

Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universität zu Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Deutschland.

出版信息

Schmerz. 2021 Dec;35(6):401-411. doi: 10.1007/s00482-021-00537-6. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1007/s00482-021-00537-6
PMID:33580414
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8613114/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Experiential avoidance is a core process variable in the concept of Acceptance and Commitment Theory (ACT) and has been connected to various disorders. A widely used instrument for the measurement of experiential avoidance is the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II (AAQ-II). Recently, a pain-specific version for chronic pain patients was introduced in the Netherlands (AAQ-II‑P). High scores indicate strong pain-related experiential avoidance. The aim of the current study was to measure pain-related experiential avoidance in a sample of chronic pain patients using the German translation of the AAQ-II‑P and to analyze its psychometric qualities.

METHODS

After a forward-backward translation procedure of the AAQ-II and adaptation to the pain context, a sample of N = 168 patients from a multidisciplinary pain center answered the German version of the AAQ-II‑P. Additional questionnaires were administered to measure specific constructs of interest: chronic pain grade (CPG), pain catastrophizing (PCS), health-related quality of life (SF-12), psychopathology (HADS-D), personality (BFI‑K) and mindfulness (KIMS-S). Reliability, factorial validity and construct validity of the AAQ-II‑P were identified.

RESULTS

The AAQ-II‑P had high internal consistency (α = 0.89) and the one-factor solution explained 61% of the total variance. Correlations to personality and mindfulness subscales were low (maxima: r = 0.44 with neuroticism and r = -0.43 with acceptance). High correlations were shown for catastrophizing (r = 0.75), depression (r = 0.73) and anxiety (r = 0.66). Also, there was a substantial correlation to health-related quality of life, specifically the psychological total scale (r = -0.58).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The German AAQ-II‑P has good reliability. Regarding factorial structure and construct validity, it is highly comparable to the original version. Direction and magnitude of the relationship to adjacent constructs mostly measure up to our expectations. Chronic pain patients inclined to pain-related experiential avoidance tend to indicate more pain catastrophizing and show restricted quality of life regarding psychological variables. Apparently, pain-related experiential avoidance can be relevant for popular target variables in psychotherapy.

摘要

引言与目的

经验性回避是接纳与承诺疗法(ACT)概念中的一个核心过程变量,并且与多种障碍有关。一种广泛用于测量经验性回避的工具是接纳与行动问卷第二版(AAQ-II)。最近,荷兰推出了针对慢性疼痛患者的特定疼痛版本(AAQ-II-P)。高分表明与疼痛相关的经验性回避程度较高。本研究的目的是使用AAQ-II-P的德文翻译版本测量慢性疼痛患者样本中与疼痛相关的经验性回避,并分析其心理测量学特性。

方法

在对AAQ-II进行前后翻译程序并使其适应疼痛情境后,来自一个多学科疼痛中心的N = 168名患者样本回答了AAQ-II-P的德文版本。还发放了其他问卷以测量感兴趣的特定构念:慢性疼痛等级(CPG)、疼痛灾难化(PCS)、健康相关生活质量(SF-12)、精神病理学(HADS-D)、人格(BFI-K)和正念(KIMS-S)。确定了AAQ-II-P的信度、因子效度和结构效度。

结果

AAQ-II-P具有较高的内部一致性(α = 0.89),单因素解解释了总方差的61%。与人格和正念子量表的相关性较低(最大值:与神经质的相关性r = 0.44,与接纳的相关性r = -0.43)。与灾难化(r = 0.75)、抑郁(r = 0.73)和焦虑(r = 0.66)显示出高度相关性。此外,与健康相关生活质量,特别是心理总量表也存在显著相关性(r = -0.58)。

讨论与结论

德文版AAQ-II-P具有良好的信度。在因子结构和结构效度方面,它与原始版本高度可比。与相邻构念关系的方向和强度大多符合我们的预期。倾向于与疼痛相关的经验性回避的慢性疼痛患者往往表现出更多的疼痛灾难化,并且在心理变量方面生活质量受限。显然,与疼痛相关经验性回避可能与心理治疗中常见的目标变量相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/897b/8613114/a0af1ac4cf83/482_2021_537_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/897b/8613114/250cf583b72a/482_2021_537_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/897b/8613114/a0af1ac4cf83/482_2021_537_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/897b/8613114/250cf583b72a/482_2021_537_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/897b/8613114/a0af1ac4cf83/482_2021_537_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
[Measurement of pain-related experiential avoidance: analysis of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II-Pain in patients with chronic pain].[疼痛相关经验性回避的测量:慢性疼痛患者的接纳与行动问卷-II-疼痛分析]
Schmerz. 2021 Dec;35(6):401-411. doi: 10.1007/s00482-021-00537-6. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
2
Measuring avoidance of pain: validation of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II-pain version.测量对疼痛的回避:接纳与行动问卷第二版疼痛版本的效度验证
Int J Rehabil Res. 2014 Jun;37(2):125-9. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000044.
3
Measurement of psychological inflexibility: an examination of the psychometric properties of the AAQ-3 compared to AAQ-II.心理灵活性的测量:与 AAQ-II 相比,AAQ-3 的心理测量学特性的检验。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Sep 30;11(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01318-9.
4
Experiential Avoidance: An Examination of the Construct Validity of the AAQ-II and MEAQ.经验回避:AAQ-II 和 MEAQ 结构效度的检验。
Behav Ther. 2018 May;49(3):435-449. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
5
Experiential Avoidance in Primary Care Providers: Psychometric Properties of the Brazilian "Acceptance and Action Questionnaire" (AAQ-II) and Its Criterion Validity on Mood Disorder-Related Psychological Distress.初级保健提供者的经验回避:巴西“接受与行动问卷”(AAQ-II)的心理计量特性及其在心境障碍相关心理困扰的效标效度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 23;20(1):225. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010225.
6
Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance.接纳与行动问卷-II 的初步心理测量特性:修订版的心理灵活性和体验回避度量。
Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):676-88. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 May 25.
7
Psychometric properties of the chinese version of multidimensional experiential avoidance questionnaire-30.多维经验回避问卷-30 中文版的心理测量特性。
BMC Psychol. 2024 May 24;12(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01790-x.
8
Swedish Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (SAAQ): a psychometric evaluation.瑞典接纳与行动问卷(SAAQ):心理测量评估。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2017 Jun;46(4):315-326. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2016.1250228. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
9
Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Trauma Specific (AAQ-TS): A study with Portuguese Colonial War Veterans.接受与行动问卷创伤特化版(AAQ-TS)葡萄牙语版的心理计量特性:一项针对葡萄牙殖民战争退伍军人的研究。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Oct 1;185:81-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.023. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
10
Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II.进一步评估接纳与行动问卷-II 的心理测量特性。
Psychol Assess. 2012 Dec;24(4):925-36. doi: 10.1037/a0028200. Epub 2012 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
[Validity of the Chronic Pain Grade Scale in nonspecific chronic low back pain].[慢性疼痛分级量表在非特异性慢性下腰痛中的效度]
Schmerz. 2024 Nov 7. doi: 10.1007/s00482-024-00844-8.
2
[Characteristic values and test statistical goodness of the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) in patients with chronic pain : An evaluation based on the KEDOQ pain dataset].[慢性疼痛患者中退伍军人兰德12项健康调查(VR - 12)的特征值与检验统计效能:基于KEDOQ疼痛数据集的评估]
Schmerz. 2022 Apr;36(2):109-120. doi: 10.1007/s00482-021-00570-5. Epub 2021 Jul 19.

本文引用的文献

1
[Pain therapy care in Germany-Do patients receiving day care differ from those receiving outpatient or inpatient care at the start of treatment? : A further evaluation based on the KEDOQ-pain data set].[德国的疼痛治疗护理——接受日间护理的患者在治疗开始时与接受门诊或住院护理的患者有何不同?:基于KEDOQ疼痛数据集的进一步评估]
Schmerz. 2020 Oct;34(5):421-430. doi: 10.1007/s00482-020-00480-y.
2
The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between Sub-Disciplines and the Impact of Potential Biases.效应量在心理学研究中的意义:子学科之间的差异及潜在偏差的影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 11;10:813. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00813. eCollection 2019.
3
Baseline Psychological Inflexibility Moderates the Outcome Pain Interference in a Randomized Controlled Trial on Internet-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Chronic Pain.
在一项针对慢性疼痛的基于互联网的接受与承诺疗法的随机对照试验中,基线心理灵活性调节了结果疼痛干扰。
J Clin Med. 2018 Dec 25;8(1):24. doi: 10.3390/jcm8010024.
4
A theoretically guided approach to identifying predictors of treatment outcome in Contextual Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for chronic pain.一种基于理论指导的方法,用于识别慢性疼痛的情境认知行为疗法治疗结果的预测因素。
Eur J Pain. 2019 Feb;23(2):354-366. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1310. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
5
When is experiential avoidance harmful in the moment? Examining global experiential avoidance as a moderator.当下经验性回避何时具有危害性?将总体经验性回避作为调节变量进行考察。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;61:158-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
6
Experiential Avoidance: An Examination of the Construct Validity of the AAQ-II and MEAQ.经验回避:AAQ-II 和 MEAQ 结构效度的检验。
Behav Ther. 2018 May;49(3):435-449. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
7
Psychological flexibility mediates the effect of an online-based acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: an investigation of change processes.心理灵活性中介了基于网络的接纳与承诺疗法治疗慢性疼痛的效果:对变化过程的调查。
Pain. 2018 Apr;159(4):663-672. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001134.
8
Developing a core outcome domain set to assessing effectiveness of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy: the VAPAIN consensus statement on core outcome domains.制定一个核心结局领域集,以评估跨学科多模式疼痛治疗的效果:VAPAIN 关于核心结局领域的共识声明。
Pain. 2018 Apr;159(4):673-683. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001129.
9
A meta-analysis of fear-avoidance and pain intensity: The paradox of chronic pain.恐惧回避与疼痛强度的荟萃分析:慢性疼痛的悖论
Scand J Pain. 2016 Oct;13:43-58. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
10
[Pain therapy in Germany - what is the difference between initial outpatient and inpatient treatment? : Assessment based on the KEDOQ pain dataset].[德国的疼痛治疗——初始门诊治疗与住院治疗之间的区别是什么?:基于KEDOQ疼痛数据集的评估]
Schmerz. 2017 Dec;31(6):559-567. doi: 10.1007/s00482-017-0240-z.