• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房患者生前临床诊断与死后发现的比较。

Comparison of antemortem clinical diagnosis and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.

机构信息

Hôpital Erasme, Department of Pathology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

Hôpital Erasme, Department of Intensive Care, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Virchows Arch. 2021 Aug;479(2):385-392. doi: 10.1007/s00428-020-03016-y. Epub 2021 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00428-020-03016-y
PMID:33580806
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8364530/
Abstract

Autopsy is an important quality assurance indicator and a tool to advance medical knowledge. This study aims to compare the premortem clinical and postmortem pathology findings in patients who died in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), to analyze if there are any discrepancies between them, and to compare the results to two similar studies performed in our institution in 2004 and 2007. Between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018, 888 patients died in the ICU and 473 underwent post-mortem examination (PME) of whom 437 were included in the present study. Autopsies revealed discrepancies between clinical diagnosis and pathologic findings according to in 101 cases (23.1%) according to Goldman classification. Forty-eight major discrepancies (class I and class II) were identified in 44 cases and the most frequent identified discrepancies were pulmonary embolism (3/12) as class I and malignancies (13/35) as class II. They were more frequent in patients hospitalized for less than 10 days then in the group with more than 10 days of hospitalization (13.8% vs 4.5%; p = 0.002). No statistical difference has been noticed concerning age, gender, and ICU stay. We observed an increase of performed autopsies and a total discrepancy rate similar to the studies performed in the same institution in 2004 (22.5%) and 2007 (21%). In conclusion, discrepancies between clinical and PME diagnoses persist despite the medical progress. Secondly, the autopsy after a short hospital stay may reveal unexpected findings whose diagnosis is challenging even if it may be suspected by the intensivist.

摘要

尸检是一项重要的质量保证指标,也是推进医学知识的工具。本研究旨在比较在重症监护病房(ICU)死亡的患者的生前临床和死后病理学发现,分析它们之间是否存在差异,并将结果与我们机构在 2004 年和 2007 年进行的两项类似研究进行比较。在 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间,ICU 中有 888 名患者死亡,其中 473 名接受了尸检(PME),其中 437 名被纳入本研究。尸检结果显示,根据 Goldman 分类,临床诊断与病理发现之间存在差异的病例有 101 例(23.1%)。在 44 例中发现了 48 个主要差异(I 类和 II 类),最常见的差异是肺栓塞(3/12)为 I 类和恶性肿瘤(13/35)为 II 类。在住院时间少于 10 天的患者中比在住院时间超过 10 天的患者中更常见(13.8%比 4.5%;p = 0.002)。在年龄、性别和 ICU 住院时间方面没有观察到统计学差异。我们观察到进行的尸检数量增加,并且总差异率与 2004 年(22.5%)和 2007 年(21%)在同一机构进行的研究相似。总之,尽管医学取得了进展,但临床和 PME 诊断之间仍存在差异。其次,在短时间住院后进行的尸检可能会揭示意想不到的发现,即使重症监护医生可能怀疑这些发现,但诊断仍具有挑战性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b556/8364530/52806fb240b9/428_2020_3016_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b556/8364530/52806fb240b9/428_2020_3016_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b556/8364530/52806fb240b9/428_2020_3016_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of antemortem clinical diagnosis and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.重症监护病房患者生前临床诊断与死后发现的比较。
Virchows Arch. 2021 Aug;479(2):385-392. doi: 10.1007/s00428-020-03016-y. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
2
Premortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill cancer patients.临终前临床诊断与尸检结果:重症癌症患者中的差异
Crit Care. 2007;11(2):R48. doi: 10.1186/cc5782.
3
A comparison of post mortem findings with post hoc estimated clinical diagnoses of patients who die in a United Kingdom intensive care unit.对在英国重症监护病房死亡患者的尸检结果与事后估计的临床诊断进行比较。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Apr;27(4):706-10. doi: 10.1007/s001340100903.
4
The relationship of pre mortem diagnoses and post mortem findings in a surgical intensive care unit.外科重症监护病房中生前诊断与死后检查结果的关系。
Crit Care Med. 1999 Feb;27(2):299-303. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199902000-00035.
5
Post mortem examination in the intensive care unit: still useful?重症监护病房中的尸检:仍然有用吗?
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Nov;30(11):2080-5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2448-5. Epub 2004 Oct 7.
6
Autopsy and pre-mortem diagnostic discrepancy review in an Irish tertiary PICU.爱尔兰三级 PICU 中的尸检和生前诊断差异回顾。
Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Dec;180(12):3519-3524. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04155-3. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
7
Comparison between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in a pediatric intensive care unit in São Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗一家儿科重症监护病房临床诊断与尸检结果的比较。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep;7(5):423-7. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000235257.86519.16.
8
Comparison of clinical and post-mortem findings in intensive care unit patients.重症监护病房患者临床与尸检结果的比较。
Virchows Arch. 2007 Mar;450(3):329-33. doi: 10.1007/s00428-006-0364-5. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
9
Autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time in the intensive care unit.随着时间的推移,重症监护病房中尸检发现的诊断错误。
Hum Pathol. 2018 Jun;76:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.02.025. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
10
A triad algorithm for analysing individual ante- and post-mortem findings to improve the quality of intensive care.一种用于分析个体生前和死后检查结果以提高重症监护质量的三联算法。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 Nov;39(6):1086-92. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1103900617.

引用本文的文献

1
Antifungal Drugs for the Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections-A Limited Therapeutic Toolbox Facing Growing Resistances.用于治疗侵袭性真菌感染的抗真菌药物——面对不断增加的耐药性,一个有限的治疗手段库
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Aug 19;18(8):1220. doi: 10.3390/ph18081220.
2
Autopsy rates and diagnostic errors in a Swiss community hospital: a ten-year retrospective analysis.瑞士一家社区医院的尸检率与诊断错误:十年回顾性分析
Virchows Arch. 2025 Mar 4. doi: 10.1007/s00428-025-04060-2.
3
A nationwide Swedish retrospective study on poisoning deaths between the years 2000 and 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring universal health coverage based on an index of effective coverage of health services in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.基于 204 个国家和地区 1990 年至 2019 年卫生服务有效覆盖指数测量全民健康覆盖:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1250-1284. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30750-9. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
2
Cause of death and significant disease found at autopsy.尸检发现的死亡原因和重大疾病。
Virchows Arch. 2019 Dec;475(6):781-788. doi: 10.1007/s00428-019-02672-z. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
3
Strategy for postmortem diagnosis of myocardial infarction.
一项关于2000年至2022年间瑞典全国中毒死亡情况的回顾性研究。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2025 Jan;136(1):e14097. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.14097. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
4
Clinical vs. autopsy diagnostic discrepancies in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis of autopsy series.重症监护病房临床与尸检诊断差异:尸检系列的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Dec;50(12):1971-1982. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07641-y. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
5
Ten misconceptions regarding decision-making in critical care.关于重症监护决策的十个误解。
World J Crit Care Med. 2024 Jun 9;13(2):89644. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i2.89644.
6
Correlations and discrepancies between cardiac ultrasound, clinical diagnosis and the autopsy findings in early deceased patients with suspected cardiovascular emergencies.疑似心血管急症早期死亡患者心脏超声、临床诊断与尸检结果之间的相关性及差异
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Jun;40(6):1353-1361. doi: 10.1007/s10554-024-03107-w. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
7
Postmortem Minimally Invasive Autopsy in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients at the Bedside: A Proof-of-Concept Study at the ICU.危重症 COVID-19 患者床边尸检微创尸检:重症监护病房的概念验证研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 30;14(3):294. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14030294.
8
Assessment of misdiagnosis in small animal intensive care patients using the Modified Goldman criteria.应用改良 Goldman 标准评估小型动物重症监护患者的误诊。
Vet Q. 2023 Dec;43(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2023.2233584.
9
A Pathology-based Case Series of Influenza- and COVID-19-associated Pulmonary Aspergillosis: The Proof Is in the Tissue.基于病理学的流感和 COVID-19 相关肺曲霉病病例系列:证据就在组织中。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Aug 1;208(3):301-311. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202208-1570OC.
10
The autopsy is not dead: ongoing relevance of the autopsy.尸检未死:尸检的持续相关性
Autops Case Rep. 2023 May 11;13:e2023425. doi: 10.4322/acr.2023.425. eCollection 2023.
心肌梗死的尸检诊断策略。
Virchows Arch. 2020 Feb;476(2):177-178. doi: 10.1007/s00428-019-02665-y.
4
Clinico-pathological discrepancies in the diagnosis of causes of death in adults in Mozambique: A retrospective observational study.莫桑比克成年人死因诊断的临床病理差异:一项回顾性观察研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 6;14(9):e0220657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220657. eCollection 2019.
5
The Importance of the Autopsy in Medicine: Perspectives of Pathology Colleagues.尸检在医学中的重要性:病理学同行的观点。
Acad Pathol. 2019 Mar 10;6:2374289519834041. doi: 10.1177/2374289519834041. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
6
Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.全球、区域和国家神经障碍负担,1990-2016 年:2016 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 May;18(5):459-480. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30499-X. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
7
Autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time in the intensive care unit.随着时间的推移,重症监护病房中尸检发现的诊断错误。
Hum Pathol. 2018 Jun;76:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2018.02.025. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
8
Comparison of Clinical Diagnoses and Autopsy Findings: Six-Year Retrospective Study.临床诊断与尸检结果的比较:六年回顾性研究
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Sep;141(9):1262-1266. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0488-OA. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
9
Early markers for myocardial ischemia and sudden cardiac death.心肌缺血和心源性猝死的早期标志物。
Int J Legal Med. 2016 Sep;130(5):1265-80. doi: 10.1007/s00414-016-1401-9. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
10
The medical autopsy as quality assurance tool in clinical medicine: dreams and realities.医学尸检作为临床医学中的质量保证工具:梦想与现实。
Virchows Arch. 2016 Jan;468(1):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s00428-015-1833-5. Epub 2015 Aug 28.