Seeman T E, Berkman L F
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.
Soc Sci Med. 1988;26(7):737-49. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90065-2.
The analyses presented here examine relationships between structural characteristics of social networks and two types of support (instrumental and emotional support) in a sample of community-dwelling individuals aged 65 and older. For each type of support, two dimensions are examined (1) the availability of such support and (2) the perceived adequacy of that support. Regression models, adjusting for age, sex, race and income show that structural characteristics such as total network size, number of face-to-face contacts and number of proximal ties are associated with greater availability of both instrumental and emotional support. The perceived adequacy of both types of support is most strongly related to the number of monthly face-to-face contacts. Comparisons of specific types of ties show that neither ones' spouse nor ones' children are primary sources of support. Rather the presence of a confidant is strongly associated with both dimensions of instrumental and emotional support; the presence of a spouse is not. And, while ties with children are most strongly related to aspects of instrumental support, ties with close friends and relatives are more strongly related to aspects of emotional support. Analyses of possible interactions show that for those without a spouse, confidants assume greater importance in providing emotional support. For those without children, ties with close friends and relatives assume a larger role relative to the perceived adequacy of both emotional and instrumental support.
本文所呈现的分析研究了65岁及以上社区居住个体样本中社交网络的结构特征与两种支持(工具性支持和情感性支持)之间的关系。对于每种支持类型,研究了两个维度:(1)此类支持的可得性;(2)对该支持的感知充足度。在对年龄、性别、种族和收入进行调整的回归模型中,结果显示诸如社交网络总规模、面对面接触次数和亲密关系数量等结构特征与工具性支持和情感性支持的更高可得性相关。两种支持类型的感知充足度与每月面对面接触次数的关联最为紧密。对特定类型关系的比较表明,配偶和子女都不是主要的支持来源。相反,知己的存在与工具性支持和情感性支持的两个维度都密切相关;配偶的存在则不然。而且,虽然与子女的关系与工具性支持的各个方面关联最为紧密,但与亲密朋友和亲戚的关系与情感性支持的各个方面关联更为紧密。对可能的相互作用的分析表明,对于没有配偶的人来说,知己在提供情感支持方面更为重要。对于没有子女的人来说,与亲密朋友和亲戚的关系在情感支持和工具性支持的感知充足度方面发挥着更大的作用。